06.04.2019

Individual work with the Philosopher, 2019

We offer for all readers of our website and forum who are looking for answers to questions about the world, about the Purpose and Meaning of human life, a new format of work... - “Master Class with the Philosopher”. For questions, please contact the Center by email:

15.11.2018

We have summed up the results of the Project’s research work over 10 years (including work on the forum), posting them in the form of files in the section of the website “Esoteric Heritage” - “Philosophy of Esotericism, our manuals since 2018”.

The files will be edited, adjusted and updated.

The forum has been cleared of historical posts and is now used exclusively for interaction with Adepts. No registration is required to read our website and forum.

For any questions you may have, including those related to our research, you can write to the email of the Center Masters This email address is being protected from spambots. You must have JavaScript enabled to view it.

02.07.2018

Since June 2018, within the framework of the Esoteric Healing group, the lesson “Individual Healing and working with Practitioners” has been taking place.

Anyone can take part in this direction of the Center’s work.
Details at .


30.09.2017

Seeking help from the Practical Esoteric Healing group.

Since 2011, a Group of Healers has been working at the Center in the direction of “Esoteric Healing” under the leadership of the Reiki Master and the Oracle Project.

In order to ask for help, write to our email with the subject “Contacting the Reiki Healers Group”:

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You must have JavaScript enabled to view it.

10.08.2019

09.08.2019

- "The Jewish Question"

21.06.2019. Video on the project forum

20.06.2019

- "The Jewish Question"

18.05.2019

- "The Jewish Question"

16.04.2019

- "The Jewish Question"

10.03.2019

05.03.2019

- "The Jewish Question"

09.02.2019

- Global catastrophe of civilization (200-300 years ago)

08.02.2019

07.02.2019

- "The Jewish Question"

12.01.2019

Popular materials

  • Atlas of the human physical body
  • Ancient copies of the Old Testament (Torah)
  • Types of Monads - The Human Genome, theories about the emergence of various races and our conclusions about the creation of various types of Monads
  • “Yahweh against Baal - chronicle of a coup” (A. Sklyarov, 2016)
  • Fierce fight for Souls
  • George Orwell "Thoughts on the Road"
  • Table of psychological equivalents of Louise Hay's diseases (all parts)
  • Has time begun to shrink and run faster? Inexplicable facts of decreasing hours in the day.
  • About hypocrisy and lies... - illusions and reality, using the example of research on social networks...
  • Simpletons abroad, or the path of new pilgrims. Excerpts from Mark Twain's book on Palestine (1867)
  • How a Komsomolskaya Pravda journalist said goodbye to glasses forever in seven weeks. (parts 1-7)
  • Esoteric Approach to Religion (Philosopher)
  • Chimeras of new times - about genetically modified products
  • The unity and monotony of monumental structures scattered throughout the world. Contradictions with the official version of the construction of St. Petersburg and its environs. Megalithic and polygonal masonry in some structures. (selection of articles)
  • Apocryphal Gospel of Thomas about the childhood of Yeshua (Jesus Christ)
  • The world is tired of Jews
  • Islamization of countries and the transition from Christianity to Islam, a selection of press materials
  • Human intelligence began to slowly decline
  • Secret program for studying Mars. Media: NASA is hiding the whole truth about Mars from earthlings. There is evidence (selection of materials)
  • TORAH TEXTS online, Tehillim (psalms) and the history of the Artifact, Pshat and Drat, Chumash - Pentateuch
  • Time does not spread, but appears immediately throughout the entire Universe, and its violated property will therefore be manifested immediately everywhere from the place of violation. The fact of the matter is that instantaneous impacts are only possible through time!

    In this world, the future already exists and therefore it is not surprising that it can be observed now.

    According to Kozyrev, time has the following properties:

    Time has directionality and density;

    Time produces energy that counteracts the growth of entropy (chaos);

    Time spreads instantly;

    Time is absorbed and emitted by material bodies;

    Time is screened (with solids, about a centimeter thick);

    Time can be reflected by a mirror, like light rays;

    Time interacts with the matter of stars, being a source of energy for them;

    An increase in entropy leads to an increase in time density. Time density is the effect of its impact on a substance per unit of time. By entropy, the scientist understood chaos, and by the growth of entropy, the desire of the system to reach a chaotic, equilibrium state. Antientropy is a desire counteracting entropy, the formation of complex ordered structures.

    Kozyrev conducted many different experiments with time, the result of which was the statement that time is a necessary component of all processes in the Universe, and therefore on our planet. Moreover, it is an active component - the main “driving force” of everything that happens, since all processes in nature occur either with the release or absorption of time.

    Kozyrev's experiments

    SCALES, TOP, THERMOS, WATER AND SUGAR

    Kozyrev drew his confidence in new views on the theory of time from several simple experiments, the main attributes of which were scales and a spinning top, and the auxiliary ones were a thermos, water and sugar.

    Experiment one. The scientist took ordinary lever scales and hung a clockwise rotating gyroscope from one end of the rocker, and a cup with weights from the other. Having waited until the scales' needle froze at zero, he turned on the electric vibrator attached to the base, and the vibration force was calculated in such a way that the vibration was completely absorbed by the massive rotor of the top. The experimenter spun the gyroscope clockwise and hung it on the rocker arm - the arrow of the balanced scales remained at the equilibrium point. Then he removed the stopped gyroscope and spun it again, but in the opposite direction. And when the gyroscope was again suspended from the yoke of the scales, a small miracle happened - the arrow of the balanced scales went to the side, showing: the gyroscope has become lighter!

    Kozyrev himself explained this paradox as follows. A gyroscope on a scale with an electric vibrator is a system with a cause-and-effect relationship. The reverse direction of rotation of the shelf (counterclockwise) contradicts the passage of time, due to which time exerted pressure on it. As a result, additional forces emerged that can be measured. And since it can be measured, it means that these forces really exist. Then it turns out that time is not just the duration from one event to another, measured by hours, but a real physical factor that has properties that allow it to actively participate in all natural processes, providing a cause-and-effect relationship between phenomena. Thus, Kozyrev experimentally established that the passage of time is determined by the linear speed of rotation of the cause relative to the effect. The magnitude of this speed, or the passage of time of our World, is approximately 700 km/s and has a plus sign in the left coordinate system.

    Experiment two. I took the most ordinary thermos with hot water. A hole was made in the cork, into which the scientist inserted a thin vinyl chloride tube. The thermos was placed near the scales with a gyroscope. At the same time, the scale arrow showed that the rotating top, with a weight of 90 grams, became 4 milligrams lighter - a value, although tiny, was quite noticeable. After this, Kozyrev began adding water at normal room temperature through the tube into the thermos. It would seem how a cylinder with hot water, which begins to cool, can influence the movement of the gyroscope and its weight, especially since the thermos has a vessel with double walls, which almost completely eliminates heat exchange with the environment. However, the scales moved again, which means that some kind of connection still existed.

    And the experiment in which two glasses of hot water were alternately placed near the scales: one with sugar, the other without sugar, completely dismayed outside observers. The glass that did not contain sugar had no effect on the scale readings. The same one in which sugar was dissolved caused the arrow to first deviate, and then, as the dissolution process ended, it returned to its original mark.

    What explanations did Professor Kozyrev himself give for his, frankly, strange experiments?

    “As soon as you add cold water to a thermos and put sugar in a glass of water,” the scientist said, “the balance of the system is disrupted, because irreversible processes begin to occur in it. And this process, until the system reaches equilibrium again at a new level (until the temperature in the thermos is the same throughout the entire volume, or sugar is completely dissolved in the water), compresses time, which has an additional effect on the gyroscope. I simply cannot offer any other explanation.”

    This explanation seemed paradoxical to many, but facts confirming Kozyrev’s correctness continued to accumulate. For example, if time affects a system with a cause-and-effect relationship, then other physical properties of the substance must change, not just weight. And so it turned out. The most subtle experiments confirmed: near the thermos, where cold and hot water was mixed, as well as near the flask, where sugar was dissolved, the vibration frequency of quartz plates changed, and the electrical conductivity and volume of a number of substances decreased.

    S.B. Karavashkin, O.N. Karavashkina

    e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]


    Speaking in our blog “On Experimental Verification” about a responsible attitude to experiment, the quality of which shapes the further development of knowledge, we cited experiments in searching for the ethereal wind as a clear example. Unfortunately, the given example is now far from the only one when physical laws are ignored and far-reaching and even philosophical conclusions are drawn from this. Another typical, but also not the only example of experiments that give rise to misconceptions, are Kozyrev’s experiments in an attempt to discover the so-called. streams of time.
    Following, like the majority, the principle introduced by the revisionists of the beginning of the last century to proceed not from experiment, but from fabrications, seeking confirmation in certain tricks that replace experiment, Kozyrev also did not proceed from the original observable, but sought by any means confirmation of his idea of ​​​​the material flow of time, conducting their research in complete violation of the physical laws observed in them. This is clearly visible both in Kozyrev’s work itself and in numerous subsequent experiments described, in particular, in Levich’s review.
    As a result of this approach, an aphysical picture of the process was formed, such as: “It should be noted right away that we are not talking about flow in the usual physical sense. The additional forces caused by the flow are internal to the system (Kozyrev, 1958, p. 69). “The obligatory existence of two forces caused by the passage of time is of very great fundamental importance. From this circumstance it follows that time can create a torque and internal stresses in a system, the work of which will change its energy. Consequently, time can transfer energy, torque, but it does not tolerate impulse" (Kozyrev, 1977, p. 213"- as if rotation does not have an impulse that would spontaneously spin all material bodies, and not just planets and galaxies, as Kozyrev wants. But the very fact that the flow of time (whatever you call it, assuming, following the revisionists, that time itself is material and can create tension in the body, force it to rotate or create a material time axis in space) for Kozyrev and his comrades arises with a balance of forces , directly testifies to the complete promiscuity of means when forming a hypothesis.
    Analyzing this approach, we will consider a standard way of transforming an experiment into a search for miracles using the example of Kozyrev’s experiment with fixation of three positions of a star - in the past, present and future. We will consider the report given by the team of the Crimean Observatory, the methodology of which is similar to the experiment described by Kozyrev, but can be considered as an independent confirmation of the results.
    This experiment was based on the diagram presented in Fig. 1 of said work.

    Fig.1. “S is the observed image of the star after the optical system of the telescope; 1 - bronze casing of the spectrometer; 2 – optical glass; 3 – thick cardboard; 4 – spectrograph slit, located in the focal plane of the telescope perpendicular to the daily movement, slit width 0.2 mm; 5 – mirror cheek of the slit; 6 – sighting device; 7 – receiving system: four-arm, single, DC measuring bridge, built on resistances OMLT-5.6 kOhm - 0.125 W, supply voltage 70-80 V; the bridge is placed in two glasses tightly inserted into one another: cardboard and aluminum; 8 – sensitive element of the receiving system, located directly behind the slot at a distance of 5 mm from it; 9 – communication wires; 10 – power supplies, adjustments and registration. An M-95 galvanometer was used as a zero indicator, as in the work, or an Endim 621.01 recorder in the “potentiometer” operating mode.”(emphasis added)

    Judging by the description and diagram, the experiment used some variation of the camera obscura shown in Fig. 2.

    Rice. 2. Camera obscura view

    However, unlike a standard pinhole camera, the experiment used a slit instead of a hole, which is not so important with a point light source and a receiver in the form of a photoresistor. Another important thing is that the slit was in the focal plane of the telescope, which is close to the conditions for the formation of the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern, presented in Fig. 3.

    Rice. 3. Scheme of formation of a diffraction pattern according to Fraunhofer

    “The width of the diffraction maximum on the screen increases in inverse proportion to the width of the slit. Two side maxima can also be observed» .
    However, there is a difference here too. In Kozyrev's scheme, the slit itself is located in the focal plane of the lens, and measurements are made behind it. In other words, the slit and the lens swapped places in the experimental design. However, when the slit itself is in the plane of focus, and in this case, a diffraction pattern appears on the screen, for the demonstration of which neither the telescope of the Pulkovo or Crimean observatories, nor the observation of distant stars is needed at all.
    A standard scheme for observing this effect is shown in Fig. 4.

    Rice. 4. Scheme for observing the diffraction pattern with an inverse arrangement of the collecting lens and slit in the case of the slit located at the focus of the lens: 1 – laser, 2 – lens, 3 – 0.2 mm slit, 4 – pinhole camera tube with a depth of 20 mm, 5 – screen

    In accordance with the diagram, an optical bench was assembled, the view of which is shown in Fig. 5.

    Rice. 5. General view of the optical ruler to demonstrate the diffraction pattern with the inverse arrangement of the lens and slit

    If we compare the diagram in Fig. 4, 5 and fig. 1, it is clear that these circuits are equivalent. Only Kozyrev used a parabolic telescope mirror as a lens, which in this case is unimportant. The main thing is that the rays converge in the gap itself. The size of the gap in both cases is the same and amounts to 0.2 mm. In this case, the distance from the source to the lens can be any. In this case, it was chosen to be 650 mm, while the distance from the lens to the slit was determined by the focal length of the lens and was 70 mm. The height of the slit was chosen to be 30 mm, and the depth of the chamber itself was 20 mm for a more clear visual demonstration of the phenomenon. The same fact that in his experiment Kozyrev covered the resistor with a paper cap: “the working resistor is covered with a paper cap”– did not significantly change the process. In our experiment, we also recorded on the paper screen of a pinhole camera and quite successfully recorded the phenomenon.
    When the slit was located outside and near the focal length of the lens, the picture of the process was trivial and represented a display of the slit on the camera screen, as shown in Fig. 6, although here too the blurring of the display of the slit on the screen can already be seen.

    Rice. 6. Photo of a slit in a pinhole camera when the slit itself is located outside the focal plane of the lens

    When a slit is placed at the focal point of the lens, the picture changes, as shown in Fig. 7.


    Rice. 7. Photo of a slit in a pinhole camera with the slit itself located in the focal plane of the lens.

    As can be seen from the photographs, the beam is divided into three beams, despite the fact that the distance to the source is small compared to the stellar one, and there is no mutual movement between the source and the screen, which Kozyrev tried to explain the effect he observed by inventing the past and future position of the source. Here, under conditions of controlled mutual immobility, the past and present position of the object cannot fundamentally differ and, moreover, a separate beam cannot foreshadow the future position, but the beam distortion is present.
    Since, according to reports, the slit in the experiments of Kozyrev and subsequent experimenters was located precisely in the focal plane of the telescope, equivalent to the focus of the lens, we can say with confidence that this distortion of the beam is due exclusively to the special nature of diffraction that occurs with a fixed arrangement of optical instruments, but in no case not the mythical superluminal beam propagation assumed by Kozyrev: “The effect of the visible image is not related to light, but only coincides with its direction. This means that the influence of time appears not only instantly, but also along the trajectory of the four-dimensional Minkowski world, the length of which is zero. Along this entire trajectory, the proper time is the same, and therefore the moment appears on it immediately. For an observer, it will propagate at the speed of light." . This diffraction differs in that it does not have a central Poisson spot, however, as in Fraunhofer diffraction from a slit, which is clearly visible in Fig. 3. Nevertheless, it is this diffraction that causes the Kozyrev effect and is generally known: “When the screens come closer together (the slit narrows), the diffraction patterns will overlap each other and under some conditions you may notice that the image of the slit blurs. With further narrowing of the slit, we will be surprised to find that its image becomes wider and wider, which is in complete contradiction with the laws of geometric optics.". As we can see, the location of the slit at the focal point of the lens not only broadens the beam, but also leads to the division of the beam into three. However, the problem here is not in geometric optics, but in the imperfection of calculations, which are usually made without taking into account the basic influencing factors. This leads to multiple fabrications that are interpreted as aphysical phantasmagoria instead of carefully analyzing the physical effects themselves recorded in experiments.
    Taking into account what was presented, Kozyrev’s result has nothing to do with either the flow of time or Minkowski space. In the specified four-dimensional space, the beam, as is known, propagates along the light cone. If Kozyrev’s ray reaches the observer instantly, fixing the past position of the astronomical object, then on the Minkowski diagram this ray would propagate not along the cone, but parallel to the real axes in complete violation of Einstein’s C-postulate, which underlies the Minkowski space itself and the principle of long-range action, with which Einstein fought. So Kozyrev’s mention of relativism is nothing more than a nod to the ruling paradigm in the hope of leniency, and nothing more.
    Similarly with closing the inlet of the device with a two-millimeter duralumin flap: “Observations have shown that when a large mirror is completely covered with a duralumin shutter about 2 mm thick, the effect of the visible image is weakened to the same extent as the effect of the true image - approximately 1.5 times.” . Let us pay attention to the fact that in Kozyrev’s text itself “the effect of the visible image is weakened to the same extent as the effect of the true image.” But if a large mirror was covered with a two-millimeter duralumin shutter, the visible image of the star would be completely covered, and would not be reduced by only one and a half times. This indicates that the sensor of Kozyrev’s device responded to the light frequency range for which duralumin is transparent. Most likely, this is the region of γ-radiation in which aluminum, which is part of duralumin, has an exponentially decreasing absorption characteristic. The proportionality of the attenuation only confirms the diffraction nature of the effect.
    Thus, we see that the effects of time flows, which are now given even a scientific-like epistemological meaning, are in fact just the result of incorrect experimental modeling. Time, as it was, remains a factor, a parameter that describes the very movement of material objects. It reflects the properties of a material to change its position relative to other bodies, but in itself cannot lead to the movement of material objects, just like speed, the acceleration of a body also characterizes movement, but is incapable of exciting the movement itself. Only material objects can do this in the process of interaction with each other.
    It is impossible to develop any concept until its basis is reliably established, and not only in the repeatability of effects, but, most importantly, in scrupulous consideration of all, especially inconvenient effects that can manifest themselves in an experimental design and which are usually neglected for the sake of economy of thought and freedom of invention . And as long as this feature of current research continues to manifest itself, as long as they seek confirmation of their own inventions to the detriment of the effects manifested by nature, as long as they run beyond the horizon, leaving behind blind spots and contradictions at an already supposedly studied level, as long as scientists will invent any absurdities instead of comprehending the laws nature.

    Literature:

    1. S.B. Karavashkin, O.N. Karavashkina.

    Kozyrev's experiments
    Unexplained » Unexplained phenomena
    11/19/2011 DARK-ADMIN
    Professor of the Pulkovo Observatory N.A. Kozyrev has been studying the problem of time for over a quarter of a century.

    To those who did not believe in the reality of his reasoning, Kozyrev demonstrated a simple but very convincing experiment. This is how the famous journalist and writer Albert Valentinov described it at one time: “It’s better to see once than to hear a hundred times,” said Nikolai Alexandrovich and showed me an experiment that was amazing in its simplicity and wit. He took an ordinary lever scale and hung a clockwise rotating gyroscope from one end of the beam. At the other end is a cup with weights. After waiting until the scales' needle froze at zero, the scientist turned on the electric vibrator attached to their base. Everything was calculated so that the vibration was completely absorbed by the massive rotor of the top.

    How should a balanced system react to this? The scales might not move, and physicists would give a completely rational explanation for this. The scales could fall out of balance, and then physicists would find another explanation for this phenomenon, no less rational. What happened?

    The arrow did not move, and I looked at the scientist with disappointment. Smiling slightly, he removed the gyroscope, spun it in the opposite direction counterclockwise, and hung it again on the rocker. - and the arrow went to the right: the gyroscope became lighter.

    It is impossible to explain this phenomenon by any of the known physical phenomena,” said Nikolai Alexandrovich.

    How do you explain?

    A gyroscope on a scale with an electric vibrator is a system with a cause-and-effect relationship. In the second case, the direction of rotation of the top contradicts the passage of time. Time put pressure on him, and additional forces arose. They can be measured..."

    And since it can be measured, it means that these forces really exist. But if so, then time is not simply the duration from one event to another, measured in hours. This is a physical factor that has properties that allow it to actively participate in all natural processes, providing a cause-and-effect relationship between phenomena. Kozyrev experimentally established that the passage of time is determined by the linear speed of rotation of the cause relative to the effect, which is equal to 700 kilometers per second with a plus sign in the left coordinate system.

    All this is very difficult to understand. And not only because it is impossible to select analogies from everyday reality that, although approximately, would clarify the essence of the phenomenon.

    The main “obstacle” on the path to knowledge is the inertia of our thinking. That is why all speculative attempts from antiquity to the present day to understand the essence of time have been unsuccessful. We must completely abandon the idea of ​​time as something that, if it exists, then exists independently of us or, in any case, next to us.

    Kozyrev states: time is a necessary component of all processes in the Universe, and therefore on our planet. Moreover, it is an active component. The main “driving force” of everything that happens, since all processes in nature occur either with the release or absorption of time.

    For those for whom the above experience was not enough, Kozyrev offered another one. I took the most ordinary thermos with hot water. Only a hole was made in the cork, where Kozyrev inserted a thin vinyl chloride tube. And then he placed a thermos near the scales with a gyroscope. The arrow of the scale showed that the top, rotating against the flow of time, with a weight of 90 grams, became 4 milligrams lighter - a tiny, but quite tangible value.

    Then Kozyrev began adding water at room temperature into the thermos through the tube. It would seem, how can a thermos influence at a distance, especially since any heat exchange with the surrounding space is practically excluded? But before the eyes of the astonished skeptic, the scales moved another notch or two: this means that some kind of influence did take place...

    After this, the cunning Kozyrev, in a casual voice, offered to drink tea. He poured boiling water into a glass, threw in sugar, stirred it... And then he removed the thermos and put a glass of tea in its place. The arrow of the scale, swinging towards the middle, again showed a decrease in weight.

    And in order to finally finish off those of little faith, Kozyrev put on the other side of the scale exactly the same glass of tea, but in which the sugar had not yet been stirred. And for some reason this glass turned out to be heavier. A little, a little, but the balance of the scales was still upset... Why?

    Kozyrev himself explained this phenomenon as follows. In the second glass, where the sugar has not yet been stirred, no special processes occur other than the natural release of heat into the surrounding space.

    And nothing happened in the thermos. But as soon as cold water was added to the thermos and sugar was added to the glass of tea, the balance of the system was disrupted. And until the system reaches equilibrium again, say, until the temperature in the thermos is the same throughout the entire volume or until the sugar in the tea is completely dissolved, the system releases or, better said, compresses time, which has an “additional” effect on the gyroscope.

    This explanation, of course, seemed (and still seems) paradoxical to many, but no one has yet come up with anything else. But facts confirming Kozyrev’s correctness continue to accumulate.

    These facts are as follows. If time acts on a system with a cause-and-effect relationship, then other physical properties of the substance must change, not just weight. And so it turned out. The most subtle experiments have confirmed: near a thermos, where cold and hot water is mixed, or a flask, where dissolution occurs, the frequency of oscillations of quartz plates changes, the electrical conductivity and volume of a number of substances decrease.

    And the scientist concluded: the release of time occurs only during “irreversible” processes, that is, where there are cause-and-effect transitions. In other words, where the system has not yet reached equilibrium.

    Commentary on the experiments and reasoning of N.A. Kozyrev.

    Kozyrev was deeply mistaken.
    What are Kozyrev’s misconceptions?
    Kozyrev assumed that time is material. That is, time moves (moves) in space in the same way as all other material bodies and particles.
    However, at the same time, Kozyrev did not understand what the materiality of natural objects (bodies and particles) is, as well as the processes of interaction of natural objects.
    I have a report on materiality in nature at the International Scientific Congress "Fundamental Problems of Natural Science and Technology 2016". Here is the link
    http://samlib.ru/n/nikolaew_s_a/kongress-2016dokladswjazxmi
    So, if Kozyrev was unable to explain some processes and phenomena in nature, then he used an explanation of the inexplicable, that is, time.
    Now let's reason, if time is material, then it consists of material particles that have mass. This mass needs to be discovered somehow. If we cannot experimentally prove that time has mass, then it will just be our imagination and speculation.
    How the existence of mass in invisible objects, in particular particles, is experimentally proven is described in detail in my report at the International Scientific Congress “Fundamental Problems of Natural Science and Technology 2016”.
    All explanations must necessarily be based either on experiments with a truthful interpretation, or on the basis of the basic laws of nature.
    Kozyrev does not have any experiments, since his experiments do not give any concrete results. But we need a specific experiment that will prove the presence of mass in time particles.
    Now let’s look at what actually exists in nature materially, and not in the form of speculation.
    In nature there are bodies and particles. They are characterized by mass. If bodies and particles have mass, then this is not speculation and fantasy. In addition, all bodies and particles move in space. The characteristic associated with movement is speed. The movement of bodies and particles with mass m in space is characterized by inertia mV (mass multiplied by speed).
    Only these three characteristics describe all processes in nature. There are no forces or energies in nature. Force is not a material process in nature. This is Huygens' invention, for which Huygens was paid, and which was supposed to confuse mechanics. And all physics can be explained only by mechanics. So, in nature there are only three characteristics of the movement of bodies and particles. If you use them, you will have correct logical explanations that do not contradict other processes. If you look for strength and energy, you will not succeed. Everything will remain inexplicable, just like in 1910 with Kozyrev.
    Now let’s look at two phenomena from Kozyrev’s experiments (“experiments”). This is an effect associated with the gyroscope and an effect associated with heating and cooling.
    First about the gyroscope. The gyroscopic effect is the holding of a plane of rotation by an object in the world space of the Universe. The greater the mass and speed (inertia mV/R), the stronger this effect is. This effect of holding the plane of rotation in world space does not depend on anything. Therefore this effect is used for navigation. All objects in the Universe move relative to each other. Think about the question relative to what the gyroscope will maintain its plane of rotation.
    Of course, regarding the broadcast.
    Now the observer on Earth (Kozyrev) has a spinning gyroscope, which in the global space of the Universe tries to maintain a plane of rotation relative to the ether.
    And the observer Kozyrev and his gyroscope move in world space with a certain speed in a certain direction. Speed ​​is a vector and relative quantity. It develops simultaneously at many speeds in which observer Kozyrev participates.
    What speed is this? The observer participates with the Earth around its axis (all speeds are approximate) 0.5 km/s, at the same time the observer moves with the Earth around the Sun 30 km/s, simultaneously with the Sun around the center of the galaxy 240 km/s, simultaneously with the galaxy around center of mass of a galaxy cluster at a speed of 500-700 km)s, simultaneously with a cluster of galaxies around the center of a supercluster of galaxies. All these speeds add up vectorially. As a result, the observer moves in world space with a certain speed in a certain direction. This will be its speed relative to the ether. Since the velocities of galaxies are the highest, the remaining velocities can be neglected. The result will be a speed of 500-1000 km/s.
    On Earth, the mass of the gyroscope is pushed (attracted) towards the Earth by ether particles. This is what we call weight. This weight is equal to mVc.s., where Vc.s. is the centripetal speed of the gyroscope directed towards the Earth, and m is the mass of the gyroscope. Kozyrev changed the direction of rotation of the gyroscope - the weight changed. So, Vts.s. depends on the direction of movement of the observer with the gyroscope in world space. In what direction and with what radial speed in relation to the observer (more precisely, to Vc.s. - the centripetal speed of the gyroscope) the observer moves in the world space of the Universe, we do not know. But based on one of the basic laws - the law of vector addition of velocities for bodies and particles, it turns out that when changing the direction of rotation Vc.s. will be less in this case. We cannot find this dependence, since we do not know the speed of observer Kozyrev relative to the ether.
    Now about the change in mass and, accordingly, weight during cooling and heating.
    Official “modern” fundamental science is deliberately confused to make people dumber and dumber. The main elements of confusing and fooling the planet's population is the term photon. “Modern” science claims that a photon has no mass, that it is a wave. Sometimes, when they need to, they write that it is a particle, but without mass. Empty particle. Idiocy.
    Here is the article: What is a wave?
    http://samlib.ru/n/nikolaew_s_a/chtotakoewolna.shtml
    What is it really like?
    In fact, in 1670, Newton proved that light (photon) has a corpuscular nature, that is, it is a particle. Naturally, any particle has mass, including the photon.
    Therefore, when thermal infrared photons are absorbed, the mass and weight of the body increases, and when cooled, photons are emitted, and the mass and weight decreases.
    Here is the calculation for the experiment. But such experiments are secretly prohibited and are closely monitored.
    https://my.mail.ru/community/blog_nikolaev_semen60/30B3D473

    What conclusion should be drawn?
    With this experiment, Kozyrev proved that the photon has mass.
    In addition, hot water evaporates through the hole in the thermos and the vinyl chloride tube. Therefore, the loss of mass of water in a thermos will consist of the mass of evaporated water and the mass of radiation (thermal photons).

    N.A. Kozyrev (1908–1983) – one of the pioneers of theoretical astrophysics

    N.A. Kozyrev

    Rebel, heretic, thinker.
    Astronomer and astrophysicist Nikolay Kozyrev

    Just in case, two lines:
    The winner of the Stalin Prize of those pre-war years introduced the formula of the “heaviness of time.” The world is not ready for this.

    Anatoly Lvov

    KOZYREV – HEAVENLY INTELLIGENT

    Live not in space, but in time,
    Minute trees are entrusted to you,
    Own not forests, but watches,
    Live under minute houses,
    And shoulders instead of sable for someone
    Wrap yourself up in a precious moment.
    What asymmetrical time!
    The last minutes - in short,
    The last parting is longer...
    The kilograms will play into a box.
    You are not an ostrich to bury yourself in mortal things.
    They die - in space.
    They live in time.

    Andrey Voznesensky,
    dedicated to Nikolai Kozyrev

    "From Stars to Stars"

    "CHANGE" No.? approximately 74-75. | Evgeniy Rein | source: www.el-nebo.narod.ru

    More than ten years ago, in February 1963, the essay “How to love the globe?” was published on the pages of Smena. The hero of this essay was Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev, an astronomer and physicist, whose discoveries and hypotheses repeatedly became the subject of public attention. It was he who, back in 1958, when the Moon was traditionally considered an absolutely dead world, discovered a volcanic eruption in the craters Aristarchus and Alphonse. It was he who discovered oxygen and hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of Venus and water vapor in the ring of Saturn. Kozyrev’s observations of Mars and Mercury made it possible to take another step in the study of these planets. All this would be enough to establish Kozyrev’s name among the major scientists of our time. And yet this is not all. In 1958, the Pulkovo Observatory published Kozyrev’s book “Asymmetric Mechanics in Linear Approximation.” This book is one of the most developed hypotheses about the nature of time.
    This book caused controversy of extraordinary force in its time. Academicians and journalists, Soviet and foreign scientists, writers contributed their share to the fierce, irreconcilable debate around Kozyrev’s ideas.
    And ten years later I returned to Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev’s office. What did these years bring to the scientist? What new did he learn about the planets of the solar system? (For Kozyrev is a convinced planetary scientist, he was not going to betray his “neighbor” astronomical calling.) And, finally, the theories of Kozyrev the physicist, what are they today?

    First, let's go back to the basics. The essence of Kozyrev’s ideas is as follows. The psychological sense of time, inherent in everyone, would seem to convince us that time moves from the past to the future and this movement is irreversible. Eternity is not a film that can easily be played from end to beginning.

    But the fact of the matter is that this is precisely what science completely ignores. Moreover, the lack of hard evidence on this matter is used as the basis for some theories.

    Kozyrev decided to justify and substantiate human intuition. He suggested that time has a real property that distinguishes the past from the future; the cause that precedes the effect, from the effect itself.

    Modern science believes that the future and the past are equivalent in the physical sense, and this idea underlies the exact sciences. To the position of classical mechanics, “cause and effect are always separated by space,” Kozyrev adds: “and time.” He believes that the ratio of spatial to temporal differences may be a finite quantity. This speed of transformation of cause into effect can precisely serve as a measure of the passage of time.

    The passage of time, according to Kozyrev, is that real property of time that has been so persistently ignored until now. This is a definite quantity and is always directed in one direction, that is, a vector, in mathematical language, the magnitude of this speed, as Kozyrev claims, can be found both theoretically and experimentally, and then after making appropriate amendments to physics and other exact sciences, many mysteries will be cleared up, many theories will get rid of inaccuracies and contradictions. How did all these unusual ideas take hold of Kozyrev! First of all, it should be noted that Nikolai Alexandrovich’s entire life in science was a gradual approach to the hypothesis of time.

    After graduating from university, Kozyrev takes on many things: he conducts astronomical observations in Pulkovo, travels to Central Asia to observe the zodiacal light, goes to Karelia to the base founded by Fersman to monitor the auroras, and teaches at several institutes.

    By the age of twenty-eight, Kozyrev had become an “international” astronomical figure. They talk about it at conventions and conferences. His plans are extensive; during his lectures, students stand in the aisles and climb onto window sills.

    But many more years will pass, years of wandering and reflection, rejection of science and return to it, before Kozyrev formulates his assumptions.

    What was the scientist thinking about before he wrote down the first words of his thin and so sensational brochure! What came to his mind when he looked at the sky just like that, throwing his head back, like all of us, not armed with telescopes and spectrographs?

    Venus is the planet of mysteries. She should be more like her than any of the Earth's neighbors, but she is always covered by a layer of clouds and remains mysterious, almost inaccessible to the human mind.

    But the Moon, our suburb - does science know much about it?

    And the entire abyss of the Universe, full of light and darkness, the mysterious life of matter and monstrous catastrophes, where it gets its energy from, should it ever freeze, having exhausted its “fuel”?

    No matter what you say, no matter how you argue about Kozyrev, you cannot ignore the main thing - he is, first of all, a thinker. His amazing hypotheses, his wonderful astronomical discoveries prove this better than any words. Evolution cannot stop, dead matter does not exist, life in one form or another must be everywhere - this is, in the most general form, the idea that Kozyrev is guided by. Therefore, the search for it is built along one main line: how, due to what, why does the Universe live? Here is the first thesis of Nikolai Aleksandrovich’s doctoral dissertation, defended back in the forties: “The energy emitted in space by the Sun and stars is supported by special sources, the nature of which has not yet been clarified.”

    And Kozyrev’s thought begins to revolve around the simplest and most complex, the most obvious and most mysterious element of existence. Entire libraries should be written about something about which, due to the importance of the issue, and about which almost nothing is known. Around Time. Time with a capital T, in which life, the existence of the Universe, lasts. Of course, Kozyrev was not the first to draw attention to this “blank spot” on the map of modern science.

    One of the greatest scientists of the century, Academician Vernadsky, wrote: “The science of the twentieth century is at a stage when the moment has come for studying time, just as matter and energy filling space are being studied.”

    Ludwig Feuerbach considered time “the fundamental condition of existence.” At the beginning of the last century, the wonderful English astronomer Erie wrote! “Prove to me that the future is different from the past, and I will build an engine on this energy.”

    And here are the words of Nikolai Alexandrovich himself: “I have long thought about the sources of stellar energy. Known patterns are incompatible with current views on this subject. It is generally accepted that stars are giant nuclear cauldrons in which thermonuclear reactions constantly occur. Based on data from astrophysical observations, I came to the conclusion that it is not nuclear reactions that determine the balance of stellar energy; they are not the first violins in the orchestra.

    What then is the source of stellar energy? My answer to this is this: by virtue of its direction, time can do work and produce energy... A star draws energy from the passage of time.”

    This is what I wrote down in my notebook ten years ago. Over the years, science has not stood still; its new data often indirectly or even directly illuminate Kozyrev’s hypothesis.

    Here, for example, is the research of the American Davis. At a depth of two kilometers in abandoned gold mines, he installed instruments that captured neutrinos coming from the Sun. The accuracy of Davis's experiments, even for the modern scientific level, was extraordinary. Calculations based on experiments have shown: the temperature inside our star exceeds 14 million degrees. This means that nuclear transformations occurring at this temperature do not provide a known yield of energy emitted by the Sun.

    In some indirect sense, Davis's experiments confirm Kozyrev's ideas. In general, it should be noted that in support of his views, Kozyrev involves a very wide range of phenomena [about their direct experimental verification - more on that later].

    Since there is no preferential direction in space, but there is only one absolute reference point - the difference between right and left, Kozyrev connects the numerous facts of “rightism” and “leftism” in the world around us precisely with the directionality, the unequal value of the passage of time.

    The direction of the coil of a shell in mollusks, the structure of some molecules, the structure of conducting vessels in plants - all this is asymmetrical. In addition, back in the last century, Pasteur discovered the chemical asymmetry of protoplasm.

    Kozyrev states: “The persistent, inherited asymmetry of organisms cannot be accidental. Obviously, it is a consequence of the laws of nature, which include the direction of time. Asymmetry can be not only a passive result of these Laws, but also a specific use of the passage of time by organisms to enhance life processes.”

    Kozyrev assigns a particularly important role in this system of evidence to the famous discovery of physicists Lee and Yang. Violation of the principle of conservation of parity in atomic mechanics, according to Kozyrev, is also a consequence of asymmetrical time forces.

    The heated debates and caution of scientists in assessing Kozyrev’s ideas are not accidental. If the matter concerned some particular issue, one phenomenon, one problem, everything would be simpler. The point is that Kozyrev is trying to grasp a new, hitherto unknown principle of natural science.

    And of course, in this global dispute, indirect evidence alone is not enough. Experimental verification is necessary and Kozyrev understands this perfectly. Moreover, in recent years, the scientist’s efforts have been focused precisely on experimental testing, testing the hypothesis. And the results obtained are more than surprising and serious.

    Kozyrev based his first experiments on the following reasoning: “If a certain system is taken out of the ordinary flow of time, then this system will be able to experience the forces of the flow of time. Analyzing the principle of causality, we can come to the conclusion that rotation of a body is a mechanical way of removing the body from the normal course of time.”

    At the same time, in the forties and fifties, Kozyrev conducted dozens of experiments with various mechanical systems [gyros, lever scales, etc.]. All of them were based on the implementation of cause-and-effect relationships between a rotating body and a stationary one. The results of the experiments satisfied Kozyrev to some extent. However, his opponents objected that the effects observed by Kozyrev could well be due to some collateral reasons, and not to the action of the forces of time.

    Initially, Kozyrev's experiments boiled down to proving the direction of time. At some point, experiments with gyroscopes were no longer needed - after all, they were, in fact, duplicate experiments.

    The Earth is a giant gyroscope, and therefore the simplest systems on its surface, for example, pendulums and scales, are quite suitable for Kozyrev’s experiments. At one end such a system was subject to vibration, and, accordingly, at the other end vibrations were absorbed. Additional voltages appeared in the system that could be measured. According to Kozyrev, the passage of time from which the system was derived influenced it.

    Later, Kozyrev suggested another physical property of time and called it “density.” It can be detected under the influence of processes occurring near the lever system, for example, near scales in vibration mode. For example, the simplest one is that salt dissolves in a vessel. The system reacts to this process.

    Three times during solar eclipses, Kozyrev observed the “forces of time” on lever scales. And these “forces” decreased, since the Moon shielded them. This kind of intervention of the Sun in earthly affairs was tested by Kozyrev in a variety of experiments. In his opinion, the influence of the Sun on earthly systems is manifested here through time, more precisely, through a change in the “density of time.”

    But perhaps Kozyrev carried out his most important experiment only now. And it is connected with the creation of torsion balances that react to neighboring processes.

    A glass of dissolving salt was placed next to such scales. The scales began to rotate. The scientist conventionally called the influence of the supposed forces of time in this case “pressure” or “wind of time.” It turned out that an ordinary mirror reflects the “wind of time” according to the laws of geometric optics.

    This is what gave Kozyrev the idea of ​​returning to the telescope in his experiments. The device that brought him so much success, work with which gave the first impetus to the search for a universal pattern.

    So, Kozyrev returned to the stars. From stars to stars - one could call the forty-year route that he took in pursuit of time.

    To study the effect of time forces, which the star will transmit through the telescope to the torsion balance, became the most important task of the last cycle of Kozyrev’s experiments.

    Two fairly bright stars were chosen - Sirius and Procyon. Some action was detected immediately.

    This is where the opportunity for a decisive experiment arose. The stars are so far from us that, moving through space, they can end up in a completely different place than the light coming from them shows. Simply put, they are often not where we see them at all. Time, according to Kozyrev, does not spread like light, but appears immediately throughout the entire Universe. This means that using the properties of time, you can establish an instant connection with the star at the point where it actually is.

    The experimental methodology is based on this idea. The torsion balance is separated from the telescope by a screen with a slit. The action on the scales is expected not when the light of the star passes through the hole in the screen, but at another moment when the true position of the star in the sky is projected onto the screen. And if this effect is established, then it is possible to determine the position of the star in world space.

    But this same point can be calculated from the known speed of the star’s movement across the sky [it is only necessary to take into account the shift in the visible image of the star due to the refraction of light in the earth’s atmosphere].

    If this calculation gives the same point that is projected on the screen during the rotation of the torsion balance, the experiment can be considered a success.

    This, as the scientist believes, is proof that time has physical properties through which it actively participates in natural phenomena.

    Kozyrev is also interested in the second conclusion from this experiment - the possibility of instant communication through time. If we assume that somewhere in the Universe there are still other civilizations, then communication with them using radio signals is, of course, illusory. For the answer to the question can be separated by centuries. Another thing is the signal sent thanks to Kozyrev’s properties of time...

    However, it is too early to dream about this. This series of experiments by Nikolai Alexandrovich is still at the very beginning. Kozyrev himself understands that these experiments can be decisive for the entire system of his ideas. Therefore, he strives to prepare them with maximum accuracy. The first observations gave encouraging results...

    All these ten years, Nikolai Aleksandrovich not only worked on experimental theories, but also carried out enormous work as a practical astronomer: he observed fumaroles in the Aristarchus crater, thinking about the connection between volcanic phenomena on Earth and on the Moon [by the way, here too Kozyrev finds evidence to support his cosmogony : he believes that processes on the Earth and the Moon can be connected through time].

    Kozyrev also studied mysterious double stars and the glow of the night sky of Venus. He discovered an atmosphere of water vapor on the ring of Saturn and proved that water vapor could exist at 90 degrees Kelvin. And in the very last months - the influence of Saturn’s magnetic field on the movement of ring particles.

    These were the years, ten years between my first and second Kozyrev notebooks. And now the last page was written...

    Nikolai Alexandrovich was sorting through the papers on the table, looking for something. And so, looking across the space of the large room at this still youthful, well-behaved man, I thought that perhaps it was too early to judge Kozyrev’s rightness or wrongness. But it is certainly worth noting that he was one of the first in world science to try to answer the “mysteries of time” deeply, decisively and completely. Perhaps he has found a door behind which a whole continent of discoveries awaits us.

    Kozyrev sees the world and science as a whole, and this allows him to look for general rather than specific principles.

    Of course, his methods differ in some way from the scrupulous and a priori obvious reliability of the work of some scientists.

    But it is precisely the union of this scrupulousness with Kozyrev’s breakthroughs that can be beneficial for the common cause.

    Without making any comparisons, I just want to note that the universe occupied Newton no less than mechanics, and Galileo’s telescope revealed to him not only distant stars, but also something common - the heliocentric system.

    Science itself will resolve the heated debate around Kozyrev’s ideas. But it is indisputable that Kozyrev is a rare type of intelligence scientist, motivator, and poet.

    Kozyrev’s routes run from stars to stars. I believe that they will not be wasted in vain. Everything we know about Kozyrev clearly indicates: he not only searches, he finds.

    Issue No. 25 (2007) | source: www.tonnel-ufo.narod.ru

    TUNNEL 25 (2007)
    Academy of Informationological and Applied Ufology International UFO Association

    Tunnel

    Collection of scientific papers
    Issue 25
    Moscow

    This collection issue "Tunnel" dedicated to the scientific heritage of the Soviet astronomer Kozyrev Nikolai Alexandrovich (1908-1983).

    Born in St. Petersburg, graduated from Leningrad University in 1928. He worked at the Leningrad Institute of Railway Transport Engineers, at the Pedagogical Institute. M.N. Pokrovsky, from 1931 - at the Pulkovo Observatory.
    In November 1936 he was arrested along with other employees of the Pulkovo Observatory, and in May 1937 he was tried and sentenced “to 10 years in prison with loss of political rights for 5 years, with confiscation of all property personally belonging to him.” Of the Pulkovo astronomers, only one Kozyrev remained alive. In December 1946, the petition of G.A. Shain. on the early conditional release of N.A. Kozyrev's conclusion was satisfied. In addition to Academician G.A. Shain, the work of Kozyrev as one of the creators of theoretical astrophysics in the USSR was highly appreciated
    Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences Ambartsumyan V.A., Professors Parenago P.P., Vorontsov-Velyaminov B.A. and Pavlov N.N.

    Main scientific works of N.A. Kozyreva dedicated to the physics of stars, the study of planets and the Moon:

    In 1934 he developed the theory of extended atmospheres and established a number of features of the radiation emanating from them. This theory was generalized by S. Chandrasekhar and was called the Kozyrev-Chandrasekhar theory;
    - developed the theory of sunspots under the assumption that the spot is in radial equilibrium with the surrounding photosphere;
    - in 1953, he experimentally discovered emission bands in the spectrum of the dark part of the disk of Venus, two of which were attributed to molecular nitrogen;
    - in 1958 he received spectrograms of the lunar crater Alphonse, indicating the release of gas from the central hill of the crater and volcanic phenomena on the Moon;
    - in 1963 discovered hydrogen in the atmosphere of Mercury;
    - came to the conclusion about high temperatures (up to 200,000) in the center of Jupiter;
    - gave a unique interpretation of the problem of the structure of stars, based on the assumption of a purely hydrogen composition of stellar interiors, and came to the conclusion that, contrary to generally accepted ideas, the release of energy in stars cannot be explained by thermonuclear reactions;
    - developed, using experimental and theoretical methods, a hypothesis about the effect of time on matter and on the energy of cosmic bodies.

    Awarded the Gold Medal of the International Academy of Astronautics (1970).

    In this article I will describe to you mirrors with interesting properties, which are called Kozyrev Mirrors. Time is a quantity that eludes human understanding. Therefore, work on the study of time is always shrouded in mystery. Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev is one of those people who try to penetrate the essence of this phenomenon and study it with the help of mirrors. Mirrors of his design, created to study time processes and called Kozyrev mirrors, caused heated discussion, and the effects obtained by screening space with the help of these mirrors have not yet been explained.

    The scientist himself published his own theory (the theory of time), the essence of which is that time is not an abstract quantity, but has direction and energy. Time affects our world and is an additional source of energy that prevents the thermal death of the Universe from occurring and ensures the observed harmony. Based on this theory, time can have the opposite direction, but in a world with such a passage of time, everything will have mirror opposite properties (for example, the heart will be on the right). It should be said that this theory did not arise out of nowhere - it is based on the work of Albert Einstein and Herman Minkowski. From their works it follows that gravity is a distortion of space, and time is one of the characteristics of space distortion.

    Kozyrev went further, from his ideas it turned out that it was possible to make time concentrators, which are Kozyrev’s mirrors. The idea underlying the design of mirrors has many points of contact with the ideas of another brilliant scientist Wilhelm Reich, a student of Sigmund Freud. He discovered that psychic energy is additionally affected by certain forces in space, which can be used to strengthen it using the structures he developed. He called the vital energy he studied orgone, and the structures themselves - orgone generators. These generators affected not only the mental energy of people, they improved the growth of plants.

    Further work led Reich to the creation of devices that could be used to influence the earth's climate. These developments frightened the American government (Wilhelm Reich lived and worked in the USA in recent years). He was arrested, many of his works were burned, and he himself, according to the official version, died in prison from a heart attack... Similar to Wilhelm Reich's orgone generators, Kozyrev's installations also have an effect on biological objects. Kozyrev's mirrors are spiral-shaped cylindrical structures made of a special aluminum alloy with a laser installation inside. Externally similar to a tomograph. According to the scientist's hypothesis, they are capable of shielding and condensing the flows of space-time.

    The use of Kozyrev mirrors in medicine

    In the early 1990s, such mirrors, in particular, were used in experiments on supersensible perception conducted at the Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences. The experiments were led by Academician V. Kaznacheev. People placed in cylindrical spirals experienced a wide variety of abnormal, psychophysical sensations, which were recorded in research protocols. In particular, the subjects inside Kozyrev’s mirrors felt a “leaving their own body.” Kaznacheev’s employees recorded cases of telekinesis, telepathy, and broadcasting thoughts over a distance. These abilities, according to the data obtained, were sharply aggravated inside a chamber of 2-3-meter, slightly curved metal mirrors. According to Kozyrev’s theory, the density of time changed inside the mirror room. Perhaps this is what influenced the aggravation of supersensible perception. People who sat inside the chamber for several hours felt like participants in long-past historical events or saw the future.

    The mechanism of interaction between Kozyrev’s mirrors for time and human consciousness is just being studied; it is still impossible to say whether the subjects are transferred to real events of the past or a reflection of these events (chronomirage) is transferred to us in the present.

    It would seem, what is special about concave mirrors? Just like flat ones, they reflect visible and invisible energies, “subtle” human radiations, and enhance them. However, concave mirrors have a fundamental and important feature: their focus is the intersection of reflected rays in space. One can only guess what consequences follow from this and what laws actually come into play. We can observe amazing facts of the use of giant concave mirrors by the ancients in the “City of the Gods” of Tibet. According to some scientists, this complex of pyramids and stone mirrors (hundreds of meters high) is interconnected with all the pyramidal complexes of the Earth, as well as structures like Stonehenge and is intended to control the energy of time. Ancient Tibetan legends speak of the Sons of the Gods who built this mysterious city, who could use the “energy of the Spirit.” Such properties of concave mirrors could not help but attract the attention of scientists.

    Experiments with Kozyrev mirrors and some conclusions

    Florentine academicians were among the first to discover their unusual properties. In 1667, in a voluminous collective work - a kind of scientific research report - they described an experiment: they installed a concave mirror at a considerable distance from a 200-kilogram block of ice and discovered that at its focus the air temperature decreased noticeably. It was concluded that cold, like heat, spreads by radiation. Today, based on the laws of thermodynamics, we would talk about a slightly different mechanism: it is not cold that penetrates into the focus of the mirror, but heat, as it were, “pulled out” from it and rushes outward. That is, a concave mirror has the properties of not only a receiving antenna, but also a transmitting antenna. This effect is widely used in radio engineering: just look at parabolic television antennas.

    Apparently, Kozyrev’s mirrors, which are a special system of concave aluminum mirrors, also have similar properties. The scientist’s confidence in the ability of mirrors to focus various types of radiation was confirmed in the experiments of Novosibirsk scientists on distant interactions: clairvoyance, telepathy, etc. It was then, for the first time in the history of science, that two global multi-day experiments were carried out on the transfer of information between people thousands of miles away from each other kilometers and not using traditional technical means of communication. Here is what their leader, Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences V. Kaznacheev, says about one of these experiments: “An advance image transfer session not announced in the program took place on December 18, 1991. Its participant K. Dolgopyatov “installed” a package of figurative information with the intention that other participants in the experiment would receive it on December 20 and 22. It was found that elements of this program were consistently accepted at the appointed time and continued to be accepted during subsequent sessions. Analysis of the numerical parameters of the sessions confirms the reality of the perception simultaneously in many points of Eurasia of information previously entered into the earth’s information space. We are closer to proving the interconnections of intellectual fields and recognizing the ability of the human mind to receive information regardless of geography and time."

    Researchers working with Kozyrev’s mirrors have identified other interesting patterns. Unexpectedly for the participants in the experiments, it turned out that, for example, luminous objects like UFOs or ball lightning often appear at the focus of these mirrors.

    One of the leaders of the experiments, Novosibirsk professor A.V. Trofimov, says: “We placed the researcher in the installation. And suddenly a plasmoid flashed inside the installation. Then, before starting work, a luminous disk-shaped object began to appear in the mirrors - minute by minute - above our building. He disappeared as soon as we stopped working. This happened 7 times. And then miracles begin... When, at the moment of preparation for the transfer of mental images, we introduced N.K. Roerich’s “Banner of Peace” symbol into the mirrors, the tester was thrown back by a certain force field. It was scary. We were not ready for this; we didn’t even have instruments to measure everything. The only thing is that we recorded on the compass that the north was in the other direction. I’m afraid to interpret the reason and still maintain some detachment.”

    At the same time, geophysical services on Dikson recorded a particularly strong disturbance of the magneto- and ionosphere, and bright colored northern lights were observed over the village. In 5 of 7 experiments of this period, a “reaction” of the information field was noted in the form of a luminous object with a trail that appeared and disappeared in the polar sky with an accuracy of up to a minute at the moments of the beginning and end of experimental work in Kozyrev’s mirrors.

    “Our researchers were very tempted to enter and get closer to Kozyrev’s installation,” admits Professor Trofimov. - But as you get closer, an animal feeling of fear arises. At 2 a.m. on December 25, one of us approached. We smelled ozone, another flash occurred, and after that the space opened up to unexpected inner content. Everyone who entered Kozyrev’s mirrors saw a huge stream of symbols - signs, glowing like neon signs... At first we thought that this was some kind of message to us. There are always many temptations in interpretations. Then we realized that most of the symbols we saw correlated with Sumerian culture. It was a moment of history that broke into our zone.”

    In 1997, Novosibirsk scientists conducted joint experiments with English colleagues. In England, at Stonehenge, more than 200 people received information from Novosibirsk remotely broadcast through Kozyrev’s mirrors. “We,” recalls Trofimov, “used a program composed of signs of Sumerian culture - symbols that have come down to us on clay cuneiform tablets. And the British accepted these symbols. This didn't surprise us. We know how to ensure that the transmitted information is accepted. Something else surprised me. In addition to these symbols, about 70 more were accepted, which we did not transmit. And all of them turned out to be signs of Sumerian culture. That is, somehow we entered that horizon of the information repository, that shelf that belongs to the Sumerian stage of development of our civilization.”

    It should be noted that experiments with Kozyrev’s mirrors on Dixon were also devoted to purely applied, medical problems - diagnosis and treatment at a distance (from France). Scientists are convinced that such a therapeutic effect is possible. The result of the experiments was the appearance of an amazing device - a mirror-laser system, designed based on Kozyrev’s ideas. Today these installations are actually used to treat people. Moreover, some forms of psychosomatic diseases are treated with great effect. People are simply transformed.

    Scientists explain the essence of the method in a nutshell as follows: during treatment, they seem to turn to the subjective (individual, personal) time of each patient. Each person is a source of time, but constantly loses and dissipates these flows, and doctors, using special screens, collect them for a short time. For this, patients are placed in a special chamber equipped with a system of Kozyrev mirrors, which screen a person’s internal fields, preventing them from scattering.

    Academician Kaznacheev believes that the phenomena described above are the reaction of the Earth’s information field to the “introduction” of human thought forms into it with the help of Kozyrev’s mirrors. It is possible that this is so. But then the question arises: what power does information have if it is capable of causing such physical phenomena? What happens at the focus of concave mirrors if the planet, and perhaps another mind, begins to respond to the thought of a person placed in it?

    I would like to dwell on the last thought. Experiments showed the presence of a difficult-to-explain danger emanating from the use of an incomprehensible effect, which is why the experiments were interrupted in all cases. It is obvious that concave mirrors, configured in a special way, are capable of not only influencing the passage of time, but also opening the door to a parallel world, which is clearly not friendly. The feeling of fear that arose in people during the experiment may indicate the presence of certain intelligent entities influencing human consciousness. Therefore, research in this direction must be accompanied by extreme caution, with an understanding of what we are dealing with.

    Kozyrev N.A. On the effect of time on matter
    Kozyrev N.A. Astronomical observations through the physical properties of time

    Gordeev G. Is time energy?
    Nikitin V. River of the Universe
    Barashenkov V.

    It’s impossible to believe, but scientists say that a mirror can distort the time field. The simplest time machine is two mirrors reflecting each other. It is here, in this space between them, that a corridor is formed, where time disappears, the boundary between the past and the future is erased. This hypothesis was first expressed by astrophysicist Nikolai Kozyrev. He argued that with the help of a system of concave mirrors it is possible to organize a space where the future and the past will exist simultaneously.

    Kozyrev, leaving his scientific testament, said that if in laboratory conditions it is possible to create a zone with compaction of time energy, then from this point access will be opened to any point in the Universe. At that time, Kozyrev’s students had no idea that his invention had a real natural analogue. Tibetan Mount Kailash,

    Which was worshiped by ancient Buddhists, is nothing more than a system of giant concave mirrors.

    Late 1990, Arctic island of Dikson. It was here, in the edge of permafrost, that the first large-scale experiment in the history of mankind was carried out on the remote transmission of thoughts using a mirror. When the mirror system was ready to launch, the entire research team was filled with fear. Later, all participants in the experiment described this feeling in the same way. A panicky feeling of horror took possession of the person as he approached the installation. We managed to get through this veil of fear by the middle of the night the next day.

    But scientists still cannot explain what happened next. The space inside the mirrors greeted the researchers with an inexplicable flash and glow, the compass needle behaved like crazy. At the moment the installation was launched, a giant fiery disk appeared above the building where it was located. The unidentified object disappeared as soon as the work stopped. Scientists nevertheless brought this unprecedented experiment to the end. One by one, the subjects entered the mirror installation - a kind of room with round reflective walls. They were offered a set of symbols that they had to draw in their imagination.

    At the same time, in different parts of the world - Europe, Asia, America, other participants in the experiment had to receive information. They had no means of communication at their disposal, only a mirror installation. The results exceeded all the expectations of scientists - in different parts of the globe, in different time zones, people literally saw the signals sent to them from the polar Dixon.

    But the biggest shock awaited scientists later - among the signals that were received during the experiment,

    Suddenly, signs of ancient civilizations began to appear. More than 70 images, none of them were specified by the experiment parameters. Each of them literally appeared out of thin air. Did scientists really manage to penetrate the huge information layer of Sumerian culture during the experiment?