The development of Moscow's transport infrastructure is an important area of ​​modernization not only for the capital region, but for the whole of Russia. Historically, it is through Moscow that passenger and cargo flows of the entire country pass. For example, the Moscow Ring Road is not so much a city highway as the only possible transit route through Moscow. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin noted that the main task is the effective integration of various modes of transport: further development of the road network and increase in their capacity, including the construction of new overpasses, moreover, on the most difficult sections.

The state body responsible for the development of transport infrastructure is the Moscow Department of Transport and Road Infrastructure Development.

Main problem, according to the Department of Transportation, this is a significant excess of carrying capacity when traveling to the city center during the morning rush hour.

As of 2011, according to the Department of Transportation, excess carrying capacity from 8 to 9 am was:

· Personal vehicles: 42%

Metro: 21%

Suburban railway transport: 40%

Land transport: no over-carriage capacity

The total excess of the carrying capacity of personal and public transport was 23%. Such an excess of the carrying capacity of the transport infrastructure during the morning rush hour leads to a significant decrease in the comfort of residents. At the same time, the loading of ground public transport was 33% lower than the carrying capacity, which opened up the possibility of its more active use to solve the transport problems of the city.

Three main areas for improving the transport situation:

1. Reduce the use of personal vehicles when traveling during morning rush hour by 33% by 2025. This meant that approximately 50,000 motorists per hour would have to use public transport.

2. Expansion of the carrying capacity of public transport (by 2025) by 41%.

3. Increasing the level of public transport service. Reduce average travel time by public transport by 25% by 2025 (from 67 to 50 minutes)

To improve the transport situation, a development program for the development of transport for 2012-2016 was developed.

The main objectives of the program:

Reduction of travel time on urban passenger transport during peak hours

· Increasing the carrying capacity of urban passenger transport

Improving the level of service and comfort of urban passenger transport, including for people with limited mobility

· Increasing the density of the road network and ensuring timely repairs and regulatory maintenance


Creation of modern systems of control and regulation of traffic

Construction and placement of pedestrian crossings, bringing them in line with established standards

Within the framework of the transport development program, there are 11 subprograms:

1. Subway. Targets for 2016: total 406 km of lines; 38 new stations; 85% of the population is provided with underground; more than 1000 new generation subway cars; completely updated navigation system.

2. Freight transport. The goal is to reduce the load on the road network from freight transport. The number of trucks operating in the city will decrease by 20%.

3. Ground urban passenger transport. Goals for 2016: average intervals in the morning rush hour 5-7 min; high scheduling accuracy; improving the quality of service; more than 70% of the rolling stock are new low-floor trolleybuses, buses, trams; 240 km of dedicated lanes.

4. Bus stations and transport hubs. By 2016, it is planned to complete work on all planar transfer hubs and on most capital ones. The time for transferring between modes of transport at all Moscow transfer hubs will not exceed 10 minutes.

5. Intelligent transport system. The goal is to improve the efficiency of traffic flow management, increase the capacity of the road network, prevent traffic jams, and reduce road accidents. The main effect is that by 2016 the entire territory of the city will be covered by an intelligent transport system.

6. Development of new modes of transport. Goals: Reducing the time of arrival of special teams by air transport to the places of emergency, providing the possibility of flights for economic and commercial purposes; the development of cycling as a means of business travel. Main effect: Putting about 80 km of bike paths; Reducing the arrival time of rescue teams by 50%.

7. Creation of a single parking space. The goal is to organize a regulated parking space to increase the capacity of the road network and limit the number of trips by private vehicles to the central part of the city. Main effect - By 2016, the total absence of illegally parked cars in the city center is expected.

8. Highways and road network. Objectives: to increase the capacity and connectivity of the road network; increasing the density of the road network; improving the quality of repair and maintenance of roads. The main effect is that the length of the city's street and road network will increase by 8.5%.

9. Inland water transport. The goal is to increase the efficiency of functioning and increase the competitiveness of inland water transport enterprises located on the territory of the city of Moscow. The main effect is that the annual volume of cargo transportation by water transport will grow by 85%.

10. Rail transport. Goals for 2016: introduction of additional main routes in 6 directions; increase in carrying capacity during rush hour by 50%; average interval 3-4 min (during rush hour on 5 main directions); 300 new wagons.

11. Pedestrian accessibility of infrastructure facilities. Purpose - Creation of convenient, short pedestrian links between urban infrastructure facilities (socio-cultural, household, commercial purposes). Main effect - Construction of 38 km of footpaths, improvement of the central part of the city.

In his annual address to the Federal Assembly, Russian President Vladimir Putin stressed that federal highways have been seriously upgraded. Now we need to put in order regional and local roads. “Federal highways have indeed been largely put in order,” Putin said. - ​Slightly worse is the situation with regional ones. And the locals are no good at all. I appeal to the heads of regions and cities: the condition of the roads should always be in the center of your attention. We need to increase the quality and volume of road construction, use new technologies and solutions, infrastructure mortgages, and life cycle contracts for this.”
Also, among the most important tasks, the President singled out improving road safety and minimizing deaths as a result of road accidents.
“In total, over the next six years, it is necessary to practically double spending on the construction and improvement of Russian roads, to allocate more than 11 trillion rubles for these purposes from all sources. It's a lot. In 2012-2017, we allocated 6.4 trillion rubles for these purposes, which is also a big figure, but we need 11,” the President said.
According to Putin, powerful Eurasian transport arteries will be developed. The construction of a highway is already underway, which will become an important part of the Europe-APR corridor. “By the way, our partners from China and Kazakhstan – ​we are doing this together with them — have already completed their part of the work. Their sites are already in operation. And we need to seriously accelerate,” Putin said. In six years, the throughput capacity of the BAM and the Trans-Siberian Railway will increase by one and a half times, up to 180 million tons. Containers will be delivered from Vladivostok to the Western
Russia in seven days. This is one of the infrastructure projects that will give a quick economic return. There are cargoes there, and all investments will pay off very quickly and will contribute to the development of these territories. The volume of transit container traffic on our railways should almost quadruple. This means that our country will be one of the world leaders in the transit of containers between Europe and Asia.
As part of the Address, the Government was instructed to prepare a comprehensive plan for the modernization and expansion of the entire backbone infrastructure.
The President also took part in a plenary session of the Congress of Transport Workers of Russia. “The balanced, confident development of transport, improving working conditions and ensuring the competitiveness of Russian carriers is an unconditional priority of our policy, a priority of the state, this is a backlog, the basis for the growth of the entire economy of the country,” Putin said. - ​Russian transport today is one of the most dynamic industries. According to the results of last year, the volume of cargo turnover increased by 5.4 percent, passenger traffic - by 8.9 percent.”
One of the most popular and popular types of communication is road transport. In terms of tonnage, almost 70 percent of cargo in Russia is transported by road. As noted in the Address of the President, federal highways have been largely put in order, but in terms of the volume of regional and local highways, there are an order of magnitude more. To solve this problem, it will be necessary to attract a large amount of private funds. “And we will systematically support investors who invest in infrastructure, launch new tools for financing road construction, such as infrastructure mortgages, and increase the attractiveness of road development projects through the development of roadside territories,” Putin stressed.
It is also necessary to use new technologies and materials that will improve the quality of the roadway, its durability, and hence road safety. There is a need to make greater use of life cycle contracts where the contractor is directly financially responsible for the condition of the road throughout its life cycle.
Together with the renewal of the country's road network, it is necessary to create a more modern and environmentally friendly transport fleet. “At the same time, I want to emphasize that it is important not to create an excessive, unreasonable burden on our companies. Propose an incentive system that will make vehicle fleet renewal as efficient as possible. The renewal process should be natural, flexible and profitable. I ask the Government to work on these issues together with the business community. This is absolutely necessary if we want to develop vigorously and increase our competitiveness,” the President said.
There is another very important topic that was discussed at the meeting of the Congress of Transport Workers - ​domestic road carriers often say that they work in Russia in unequal conditions compared to foreign companies. “I ask the Government, together with the Union of Transport Workers and other associations of road carriers, to analyze this situation again. By the way, we are constantly doing this, but, apparently, all the issues have not been fully resolved. It is necessary to prepare changes in this part as well,” Vladimir Putin said.

The socio-economic position occupied by motor vehicles in the transport structure of Russia determines its priority and undeniable advantages in terms of high-tech services, the main characteristics of which are: flexibility, mobility, reliability, urgency, cargo safety, cost of services. Transport, including international road transport, plays a key role in the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. If in 2004 the volume of road transportation within the country decreased by more than 2 times, the volume of international traffic increased by more than 10 times and amounted to almost 18 million tons.

Including the exchange of foreign trade cargo with non-CIS countries increased from 1.5 million tons to 13.45 million tons. the share of road transportation is projected at the level of 15-20% of the total volume of cargo transportation, while the growth in the volume of international road transport in recent years is 12-15% annually.

At present, 4,000 transport workers are registered in Russia, carrying out international transportation on a permanent basis, of which more than half are engaged in freight transportation. ASMAP members are 1,200 enterprises and 1,100 have access to the TIR system (TIR). These enterprises have 15 thousand road trains suitable for use in the TIR system. Carriers are unevenly distributed across the territory of Russia.

In terms of traffic volume, two federal districts - Central and North-Western, occupying a leading position in the country's foreign trade, provide about 80% of the total volume of foreign trade traffic.

The structure of foreign trade freight road freight turnover in foreign countries has been quite stable over the past few years.

The European Union is Russia's largest trading partner, with a 35% share. This value is provided mainly by cargo turnover with Finland and Germany (in the EU they account for more than 90% of all export road transport and 70% of import traffic). Road transport traditionally provides 20% of all foreign trade of the Russian Federation with the CIS countries.

In general, in terms of imports, most of the goods come to Russia from Finland (61% of the total volume). The share of imports in Russia of other countries, with the exception of China (8%), does not exceed 4.5%. Basically, imports are imported to Moscow and St. Petersburg (their shares are respectively 39 and 11%). In third place is the Kaliningrad region. The shares of other constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the total volume do not exceed 7%.

Most Russian goods are exported by trucks from Karelia (38%) and the Leningrad region. (17%). From these regions, wood is mainly exported to Finland. In general, together with paper, the share of forest products in exports is about 65%.

Simultaneously with the dynamic development of road transport as a whole, the objective integration of the country's economy into the global economic space determines the priority for the development of international road transport and the market for international road transport services. The share of road transport in the total value of foreign trade goods transported by all modes of transport is about a third. It should be noted that the average cost of transporting foreign trade goods by road is about $1,500 ($130 by rail and $190 by sea).

In 2005, the market for international transportation of goods by road in Russia increased to 19.2 million tons. At the same time, the volume of traffic carried out by Russian transport workers increased from 5.6 million tons to 6.4 million tons. But their situation would be even better if it were not for losses due to delays at the border and foreign competition: foreign companies in In 2005, 5.2 million tons were transported (in 2004, 4.4 million tons).

Domestic motorists transported 55.2% of cargo, but the volume of their transportation increased by 14.3% over the year, while the volume of transportation of foreigners - by 18.2%.

Experts believe that Russia lost more than $500 million due to the import of road transport services in 2005. So, last year, 60% of road cargo in the direction of Russia - Europe was delivered by foreign carriers, mainly from Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic countries. The main reason for the large imports of road transport services is the 20% value added tax rate applied to Russian road carriers, but not applicable to foreigners, which sharply reduces the competitiveness of Russians.

In addition, the annual losses from idle time at the borders amounted to about $60 million. There are more than 160 automobile checkpoints along the perimeter of the state border of Russia with the services of the transport inspection of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation. However, due to the lack of facilities at these points and the lack of proper coordination of the work of border crossings, vehicle downtime exceeds all conceivable limits. It is believed that Russian hauliers lose up to $20 per hour from downtime.

The development of domestic international vehicles is hindered by the fact that more than 60% of the Russian fleet do not meet the minimum Euro-1 environmental standards and their operation in Europe is limited. Only 23% of cars comply with them, 15% meet Euro-2, and less than 1% meet Euro-3 requirements. In addition, the catastrophic aging of the rolling stock leads to a drop in the profitability of transportation, an increase in repair and maintenance costs, a lack of safety guarantees, the possibility of delays in delivery and a decrease in the quality of service, and, ultimately, to a decrease in the competitiveness of Russian transport workers.

It should be noted that the Russian industry practically does not produce rolling stock for international transportation that meets European requirements. Therefore, vehicles are purchased from foreign manufacturers: Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, Scania, IVECO, MAN, DAF, etc.

Recently, the government has taken a number of measures to protect the economic interests of Russian international road transporters. In particular, since 2002, customs duties on the import of heavy road trains of the Euro-3 and promising Euro-4 class, which are not produced in Russia, have been abolished. The Ministry of Transport sent a proposal to the government of the Russian Federation to introduce into the Tax Code of the Russian Federation a norm on the application of a tax rate of "zero percent" for the import and export of Russian foreign trade goods.

The most important factor contributing to the development of international road transport is the geopolitical position of Russia between the two world economic centers - Europe and Asia. Russia, which occupies more than 30% of the territory of the Eurasian continent and has a highly developed transport system, is objectively a natural bridge providing transit links in this direction. But so far, Russia's powerful transit potential has been little used. Therefore, one of the promising directions for the development of the Russian economy is the improvement of the country's transport system and the realization of its powerful transit potential to ensure Eurasian ties. This will be a significant contribution to the increase in Russia's GDP, due to the growth in the volume of transport work and the multiplier effect in other sectors of the economy. Transit rent (income of the national transport system from the transit transportation of passengers and goods) is becoming an important item of foreign exchange earnings.

The main cargo flows of foreign trade and transit traffic are concentrated along the West-East and North-South axes and coincide with the main directions of transportation in interregional traffic within Russia, in the gravity area of ​​\u200b\u200bwhich more than 80% of the population and industrial potential of the Russian Federation are concentrated. Up to 76% of the total volume of international cargo transportation by road follows Russian roads that are part of international transport corridors, but the share of transit cargo is also noticeable.

Passing through the territory of Russia (in 72 subjects of the Russian Federation), international transport corridors serve not only intra-regional and inter-regional transportation, but also continental transportation between the countries of Europe and Asia. It is obvious that the development of international transport corridors meets both external and internal economic interests of Russia. Three out of ten pan-European transport corridors pass through the territory of Russia.

In addition, the main Eurasian corridors "North-South" and "Transsib" pass through the territory of Russia within the framework of the system of Eurasian corridors, recorded in the Declaration of the 2nd International Eurasian Conference on Transport, as well as a number of additional routes that expand the coverage areas of the corridors and increase them. efficiency due to more complete coverage of international relations.

Conclusion: By itself, the country's advantageous geographical position cannot ensure an increase in the volume of transit traffic. The development of transit is accompanied by an increase in the requirements for the quality of transport services provided: the safety of goods, the reduction of delivery time, the reduction of transportation costs, etc.

The central part of the European territory of Russia at the intersection of the most important transport routes of the country, 400 km south of Moscow. The Lipetsk region borders on the Voronezh, Kursk, Orel, Tula, Ryazan, Tambov regions.

The region has a developed transport infrastructure. The territory is crossed by three railway lines connecting Moscow with the industrial centers of the south of Russia - Voronezh, Rostov, the North Caucasus and Donbass, with the Volga region, as well as with western cities: Orel, Bryansk, Smolensk. The largest junction stations are Yelets and Gryazi. The total length of the railway network is over 800 km. The main volume of freight and passenger traffic is associated with the South Eastern Railway.

Chapter 1. Public passenger transport as a system in the social infrastructure of the metropolis

1.1 Genesis of social infrastructure as a scientific category

1.2. Institutional elements of transport infrastructure

1.3. The role of public passenger transport in the life support of the city

1.4. Managing the quality of passenger transport services in 79 metropolitan areas

Conclusions to chapter 1

Chapter 2. Socio-economic problems of the development of passenger transport in Moscow

2.1. The impact of the transport situation on the movement of the population in the metropolis

2.2. Research of the market of passenger transportations 121 2.3. Definition of criteria and a method of segmentation of consumers of transport services to the population 133 2.4. The main directions of development of the transport system in the aspect of improving the social infrastructure of Moscow

Conclusions to chapter 2

Recommended list of dissertations

  • Organization of logistics flows in the system of urban passenger transportation 2000, Candidate of Economic Sciences Malchikova, Alexandra Germanovna

  • Organization of the functioning of the transport logistics system of the metro 2003, candidate of economic sciences Vorobieva, Irina Borisovna

  • Assessment of the logistics system of transport support for people with limited mobility 2012, candidate of economic sciences Gaidaev, Vladislav Sergeevich

  • Development of models and methods for managing urban passenger transportation based on a logistics approach 2006, Candidate of Economic Sciences Kiryanov, Alexander Lvovich

  • Assessment of the current state and prospects for the development of urban passenger transport in Moscow 2004, Candidate of Economic Sciences Alexey Konstantinovich Glukhov

Introduction to the thesis (part of the abstract) on the topic "Development of the passenger transport system as one of the conditions for improving the social infrastructure of the city: On the materials of Moscow"

Relevance of the research topic. Transport is one of the most important elements of the social infrastructure of the metropolis. Urban passenger transport is one of the branches of the life support of the city; both the work of the economic complex and the way of life of the population depend on its functioning. In recent years, the socio-economic crisis has affected the operation of urban passenger transport (UPT), which resulted in a decrease in the financing of the industry, a decrease in the volume and quality of passenger traffic, and a significant reduction in rolling stock. All this has led to the fact that the development of the GPT significantly lags behind the needs of the population in movement, which causes socio-economic problems and negatively affects the work of other sectors of the city's economy.

The greatest demand for transport movement is formed in cities with a population of more than 1 million people. Currently, 13 Russian cities have a population of more than 1 million people. Of the 107.3 million people living in Russian cities. (73% of the total population of the country), about 60% regularly use urban passenger transport1.

It is in the largest cities that transport problems are especially acute. The functioning of passenger transport largely determines the socio-economic potential of the metropolis and, through the factor of transport accessibility, influences the formation of prices in the real estate market, contributes to an increase in economic activity, therefore, the formation of a system of urban orders for transport services to the population is one of the priority tasks of city administrations.

Currently, about 8,200.6 billion passengers a year are transported in Moscow by all types of urban transport, 89% of which use the four main types of public transport

1 Transport in Russia: Statistical compendium. - M., 2005. - S. 12. 3 metro - 29.6%, bus - 24%, tram - 20.8%), trolley bus -15.1%>). Passenger vehicles carry 10%> of the total number of passengers. An insignificant part of transportation (about 1%) is carried out by rail and river transport within the city1.

With a reduction in the volume of social transportation by surface urban transport, where passengers are granted the right to free and preferential travel, commercial bus transportation is actively developing, satisfying the population's ability to pay for transport services of lower quality. Currently, the city has 544 bus routes, 85 - trolleybuses, 38 - trams, which serve 7700 units. Commercial carriers operate 871 routes, the total fleet of rolling stock is 5.3 thousand units.

However, the problems of passenger transport are far from their "effective solution. The reasons that struck the backlog remain insurmountable so far. These include:

1. the gap between the development of the passenger transport system and the potential needs of the population for movement; deterioration in the quality of transport services (the occupancy of the rolling stock is growing, the intervals of movement of ground transport are increasing up to 15-20 minutes during peak hours, the time spent on labor movements by 60% of the city's population reaches 2.5-3 hours instead of the standard 80-90 minutes per day , which causes significant traffic fatigue);

2. inconsistency in the work of various modes of transport in providing passenger traffic;

3. backwardness of the material and technical base, excessive wear and tear of rolling stock, insufficient carrying and carrying capacity of passenger transport (at present, a significant part of the rolling stock has exhausted its resource: 47% of tram cars have a service life of more than 10 years; 40% of trolleybuses have a service life of 5

1 Transport in Russia: Statistical compendium. - M., 2005. - S. 10. 4 to 10 years old; 46% of subway cars have a service life of over 20 years; 57% of the fleet of buses have a service life of over 6 years. Due to the lack of budget financing, the purchase of new rolling stock does not allow replacing the outdated fleet of vehicles);

4. subsidization of urban passenger transport (only 55% of current expenses are provided through the collection of fares), insufficient budget funding to cover losses from transportation of preferential categories of passengers.

Thus, the problem as a whole and its individual aspects create instability in the social mood of the inhabitants of the metropolis, reduce the rhythm of its life.

The transport system of the metropolis is one of the most important subsystems of the social infrastructure, and the management of its development will fully determine the solution of Moscow's strategic tasks. A balanced and harmonious development of the city is possible only with the maximum efficiency of using its labor potential. To achieve sustainable well-being of urban social groups, it is necessary to accelerate the development of passenger transport.

The factors that determine the requirements for passenger transport in Moscow are:

Social demands of the population;

Compensation for the territorial gap between the production area and residential areas of the metropolitan areas;

Significant daily flow of labor and population from the suburbs; transit flow of passengers through the city;

Active housing construction on the periphery of the city;

Planned growth of the scale of the city's enterprises.

The conditions of transport service are also one of the indicators of the quality of life that affect its duration. To solve transport problems in Moscow, the activity of governing bodies, institutions and organizations in the development and implementation of transport policy is of particular importance. The current economic conditions require the most complete and high-quality provision of the needs of the population in passenger transportation, aimed at achieving the stable functioning of the GPT, its safety and efficiency.

The degree of scientific development of the problem. The study of the social infrastructure of the city has a long tradition. Already M. Weber, E. Durkheim, G. Simmel, considering the economic, social and psychological problems of urban growth, analyzed the demographic aspects and moral health of citizens1.

Domestic sociologists have made a significant contribution to the development of social infrastructure problems. Various aspects of the influence of material elements on the effective activity of different social groups of the population were analyzed in the works of scientists dealing with the problems of social planning, management and forecasting: V.G. Afanasyev, I.V. Bestuzhev-Lada, M.V. A. Burtnieks, N.A. Denisov, V.N. Kovaleva, L.A. Kovalenko, L.N. Kogan, A.V. Kostinsky, N.V. Kuksanova, V.L. .Lapina, V.S. Lukina, G.I. Osadchey, Zh.T. Toshchenko, S.F. Frolova, O.V. Yuferova.2

At the same time, there are many unexplored aspects in the structuring of the social infrastructure of the city, among which it should be noted

1 Weber M. Urban growth in the 19th century. - St. Petersburg, 1903; Simmel G. Big cities and spiritual life // Big cities, their social, political and economic significance. - St. Petersburg, 1905.

2 Afanasiev V.G. Society: consistency, knowledge and management. - M., 1981; Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Predictive substantiation of social innovations. - M., 1993; Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Social forecasting: a course of lectures. - M., 2001; Burtnieks A.A. Social infrastructure planning. - Riga, 1983; Denisov N.A. Social infrastructure of Russia: state, problems and ways of development. - M., 1988; Kovalev V.N. Sociology of social sphere management. - M., 2003; Kovalenko L.A. Planning the social infrastructure of the region (on the materials of the Murmansk region). - L., 1989; Kostinsky A.V. Planning for the integrated development of the social infrastructure of the regions. - Kyiv, 1989; Kuksanova N.V. Social infrastructure of Siberia. - Novosibirsk, 1993; Kurakov V.A. Resource support of the social sphere. - M., 1999; Kurakov V.L. Strategic planning for the development of the social sphere: methodology and concept of increasing the effectiveness of its structural components. - St. Petersburg, 2002; Lapin N.I. Theory and practice of social planning - M., 1975; Lukin B.C. Regional planning of social infrastructure. - M., 1986; Osadchaya G.I. Sociology of the social sphere. - M., 1999; Osadchaya G.I. Social sphere of society: theory and methodology of sociological analysis. - M., 1996; Toshchenko Zh.T. Social infrastructure and development paths. - M.: Thought, 1980; Yuferov O.V. Social infrastructure planning: a sociological approach. -M, 1990. weak management system in the organization of urban passenger transport.

The transport system as a way to overcome space and the most important type of social infrastructure of the city has not yet received proper coverage.

A more voluminous place is occupied by the economic essence of the transport system, its role in social reproduction is reflected in the works of K. Marx, V. Eucken, J. M. Keynes1. Recently, the problems of transport infrastructure have been embodied in special literature and periodicals, in the works of scientific practitioners (F.F. Rybakov, O.S. Belokrylova, etc.), where priority is given to technical aspects.

The study of the spatial aspect of social systems has been the subject of attention of some domestic and foreign researchers. Observation of the connection between economics, history and geographical space can be found in a variety of scientists of the XIX - XX centuries. in a wide range from Friedrich List (“autarky of large spaces”) to Fernand Braudel (“world-economy”) and Immanuel Wallerstein (“world-systems approach”)3. A significant contribution to the study of these issues was made by Russian sociologists and economists of the past - M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky, V.I. Lenin, N.D. Kondratiev4, modern Russian researchers - A.A. Illarionov, V.A. Osipov, Yu.M. Osipov and others5.; outstanding foreign scientists - M. Weber,

1 Marx K. Capital// Marx K., Engels F. Soch. 2nd ed. T.23-25; Oyken V. Fundamentals of national economy.-M.: Economics, 1996; Keynes JM General theory of employment, interest and money// Anthology of economic classics. T. 2.- M., 1993.

2Rybakov F.F. North-West of Russia: problems of socio-economic development//Economic science: problems of theory and methodology. St. Petersburg, 2002; Belokrylova O.S. Theory of transitional economy. Rostov-on-Don; "Phoenix", 2002.

3 List F. Das nationale System der politiscen Okoromie - Bruges.1968; Braudel F Material civilization, economics and capitalism. XV - XVIII centuries. In 3 T. - M .: Progress, 1982-1992; Vaiperstein I. The end of the familiar world: Sociology of the XXI century. - M.: Logos, 2003.

4 Lenin V.I. The development of capitalism in Russia / Sobr. Op. v.3; aka Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism// Poly. Sobr. Op. v. 16; Kondratiev N.D. Selected Works M.: Economics, 1993; Tugan-Baranovsky M.I. Periodic industrial crises. History of the English Crises. General theory of crises. - M, 1923.

5 Osipov Yu.M. The time of economic philosophy. M.: Economy, 2003; Osipov Yu.M. Theory of economy.-M., 1998.

F. Hayek, R. Coase et al.1. Their works reflected the methodological problems of the spatial development of socio-economic systems, certain issues of their structural organization in relation to the conditions of the market and other ways of organizing economic life.

Some problems of the development of urban spatial systems were considered in the works of V.A. Chulanova, O.V. Bondarenko and others.

In domestic science, the problems of the city and urbanization began to be considered at the beginning of the 20th century. So, N.P. Antsiferov proposed an integrated approach to understanding the city as a single social organism3. The issues of urban planning and development were dealt with by J1.A. Velikhov, E.O. Kabo, N.A. Milyutin, V. Mikheev, M.A. Okhitovich, S.T. Strumilin, D.S. Samoilov and others. In the domestic sociological science, the problems of overcoming the differences between the city and the countryside, the integrated planning of the economic and social development of cities were most actively developed (N.A. Aitov, N.N. Baikov, A.G. Lazarev, S.I. Semin , Zh.T. Toshchenko, O.I. Shkaratan and others). The most promising and necessary for the development of the sociology of the city is the direction of an integrated and systematic approach to the study of the process of urbanization and problems of the city (N.A. Aitov, A.S. Akhlezer, A.V. Dmitriev, L.A. Zelenov, V.M. Zuev, F.S. Faizullin, O.N. Yanitsky, etc.). Works are devoted to the study of social problems, revealing the conditions and factors of the urban lifestyle, characteristics of the level of satisfaction of needs and interests, changes in the daily activities of citizens (M. Bokiy, L. Shapiro, Yu. Kirillov; T. M. Karakhanova, A. A. Neshchadin , N.I. Gorin, V.D. Patrushev, V.V. Khmelev)4.

1 Weber M. Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. - Ivano-Frankivsk: East View, 2002; Hayek F. Knowledge, competition, freedom. St. Petersburg: Pnevma, 1999; Hayek F. Pernicious arrogance. - M.: News, 1992.

2 Chulanov V.A., Bondarenko O.V. and others. Sociology and ecology of cities and town planning. - Rostov n / D.: publishing house "Pegasus", 1997; Chulanov V.A., Kamynin I.I. etc. Problems of modern society (lectures on sociology). - Rostov n / D .: Publishing house of RGTTU, 1996;

3 See: Antsiferov N.P. Ways of studying the city as a social organism. Experience of an integrated approach, - L., 1926.

4 Boky M., Shapiro L., Kirillov Yu. Polls in the city and for the city - Obninsk, 2002; Dmitriev A.V. USSR

USA: social development in cities (Experience of comparative analysis). - L., 1981; Green J1.A. Sociology of the city. - M., 2000; The way of life of citizens in objective and subjective indicators / Otv. ed.

T.M. Karakhanova. - M., 2002; A. Neshchadin, N. Gorin City Phenomenon: Socio-Economic Analysis. 8

The city is a social unit of society that covers all stages of human life1. It is the city, taken as a whole, that constitutes the material basis for the development of the individual. If a person spends a certain time in production and only at working age - on average from 18 to 60 years old, then the city serves him all his life - from the maternity hospital to the cemetery2.

Integrated and systematic approaches have gained great popularity in Russian sociology, based on the opportunity they provide for the widest coverage and deep knowledge of the essence of social phenomena. However, the declaration of these approaches does not guarantee their presence in the study. Such a shortcoming was contained in many works on the study of the city, its social planning, image, and life of the urban population. Some of them did not take into account the objective conditions for the functioning of both the city and its social infrastructure. The main attention was paid to the quantitative indicators of urban development, which form the basis for the formation of the lifestyle of citizens. At the present stage of development, there is a noticeable trend towards revealing the role of the "human" factor. In particular, within the framework of the concepts of social planning, we are talking about moving from normative planning to “need-prognostic”, when the construction of social infrastructure facilities will be planned based not on abstract norms, but on the basis of the immediate needs of the urban population, due to socio-territorial and cultural and historical conditions.

Some concepts within the sociology of the city refer to terminology directly related to lifestyle: "environmental quality", "standard of living", "lifestyle".

M., 2001; Patrushev V.D. The life of a city dweller - M., 2001; Patrushev V., Karakhanova T., Kushnareva O. The time of the inhabitants of Moscow and the Moscow region // SOCIS. - 1992. - No. 6; Faizulin F. Sociological problems of the city. - Saratov, 1981; Yanitsky O. Urbanization and social contradictions of capitalism. - M., 1975; Khmelev V.V. The true guidelines of the social institution of service in the conditions of Russian society. - M., 1999.

1 See: Toshchenko Zh.T. Social infrastructure: the essence and ways of development, - M., 1980.-S.65.

2 See: Aitov N.A. Problems of planning the social development of cities, - M., 1971.-S.35. 9

Thus, at the junction of two areas in sociological science - the sociology of the city and the sociology of lifestyle - an environment has been formed that is conducive to solving the issues of interdependence of the social infrastructure of the city and the way of life of citizens.

However, the problem of the relationship between the needs of citizens and the state of the social infrastructure of the city remains open. The study requires the disclosure of the interconnections of such phenomena as the lifestyle of the urban population and the state of the social infrastructure of the city.

In the 90s of the XX century, on the basis of the interaction of economics and political science, geopolitics arose - a direction of social sciences, in the subject of which various aspects are viewed, uniting the issues of history, economic geography, the modern world economy, conflictology, the theory of control systems into a single complex (A. Dugin , A.I. Neklessa and others),1 which, one way or another, also affect the problems of transport infrastructure. The same class of problems includes works on the problems of globalization: the transition to the post-industrial era (D. Bell, J. Galbraith, V. Inozemtsev, M. L. Sastels, JI. Typoy, etc.), economic and social aspects of globalization (T Faminsky, A. L

Fedotov, A. Shanin, G. Martin, A. Neklessa, V. Obolensky and others).

The spatio-temporal positions of social actors, as playing a significant role and influencing the results of activity, were proposed to be placed at the center of sociological analysis by the American sociologist E. Giddens. This offer in

1 Dugin A. Fundamentals of geopolitics. Geopolitical future of Russia. Think in Space. - M.: "ARKTOGEYA-center", 2000; Neklessa A.I. Global Community: Cartography of the Postmodern World. -M., 2002.

2 Bell D. The coming post-industrial society. Experience of social forecasting. - M.: Academia, 1999; Castells M. Information Age: Economics, Society and Culture. - M.: GU VESh, 2000; Turow L. The Future of Capitalism. How today's economic forces are shaping tomorrow's world. - Novosibirsk, 1999; Inozemtsev V.L. Outside the economic society. M .: "Academia" - "Science", 1988; Faminsky T. Economic globalization: basis, components, contradictions, challenges for Russia //REJ.-2000.- No. 10; Fedotov A.G. Global studies: the beginnings of the science of the modern world. - M., 2002; Shanin A.S. Localization as a product of globalization // Social and humanitarian knowledge. - 2003. - No. 3; Martin G.P., Schumann X. Western globalization: an attack on prosperity and democracy. - M.: Publishing House "ALYTINA", 2001; Neklessa A.I. Fourth Rome. Global Thinking and Strategic Planning in the Last Third of the 20th Century // Russian Strategic Studies, Moscow, 2002; Obolensky V. Globalization of the world economy and Russia //Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2001. - № 12. Sociology seems to be innovative and possibly applicable in the analysis of the social nature and characteristics of the transport system1. Due to insufficient knowledge of this problem, its scientific and practical significance, it is of significant research interest.

The above provisions determined the choice of the topic of the dissertation research, and also determined its purpose and objectives.

Purpose - to study and analyze the state and prospects for the development of the passenger transport system as an essential element of the city's social infrastructure; development of recommendations for improving management aimed at meeting the needs of the population in transport services.

Conduct an analysis and generalization of the main modern approaches to the study of the social infrastructure of the city, highlight the specifics of the sociological approach to the study of urban infrastructure;

Analyze the role of public passenger transport in the life support of the city;

Analyze the state and prospects for the development of services in the market of transport services to the population;

Analyze the significance for passengers of consumer characteristics of transport services;

Develop criteria for market segmentation and segmentation analysis of transport services according to the selected criteria;

Explore trends in the development of the transport system in the metropolis;

1 Giddens A. The Class structure of the advanced Societies. L., 1973; GiddensA. New rules of sociological method.L.1976; Giddens A. Central problems social theory. - L., 1979; Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley 1984; Giddens A. Sociology. Cambridge, 1989.

Purpose - to study and analyze the state, prospects for the development of the passenger transport system as the most important element of the city's social infrastructure in modern conditions; development of recommendations for improving management aimed at meeting the needs of the population in transport services.

Conduct an analysis and generalization of the main approaches to the study of the social infrastructure of the city, highlight the specifics of the sociological approach to the study of urban infrastructure;

Analyze the state, problems and prospects for the development of the market of transport services to the population;

To reveal the importance for passengers of consumer characteristics of transport services; generalize and clarify the criteria for market segmentation and segmentation analysis of transport services according to the selected criteria;

Develop a multifactorial model for consumers to choose the services of different types of transport.

The object of research is the urban passenger transport system as the most important element of the social infrastructure of the metropolis.

The subject of the study is the development of the city's passenger transport system based on the study of the level of satisfaction of the population with its services and the process of segmentation of the transport market in Moscow.

The theoretical and methodological basis of the study are the works of domestic and foreign scientists on the problems of general, economic sociology, the sociology of management and the sociology of the city, as well as concepts, theories and approaches that allow studying social processes in the city:

Theory of social management and sociology of management (V.G.

Afanasiev, Yu.I. Averin, N.M. Baikov, G.I. Gribanova, V.N. Ivanov, V.D. Patrushev, V.A. Sologub, Zh.T. Toshchenko and others);

Complex sociological approach (G.S. Batygin, Yu.E. Volkov, )f E.N. Ozhiganov, M.N. Rubkevich and others).

Empirical base of research.

The analysis of the passenger transport system was carried out on the basis of empirical data, which can be divided into four groups.

The main group includes materials of sociological research at the international, all-Union and municipal levels, conducted in the 80-90s. XX century, as well as at the beginning of the XXI century. The most significant of them are the following:

1 gr. an international study dedicated to the issues of ® transport organization and quality of services. The measurements were taken in

1998,1999,2000,2002 (Florence) (N=6 thousand people, express survey). I

2 gr. secondary analysis of empirical data from a number of comparable sociological studies:

Sentsova K.A. - "Management of passenger traffic in railway transport", Moscow, 2003, (N=1560 people; questioning);

Vasilenko E.A. - "Providing socially significant services to the population of the city", Moscow, 2005, (N=3010 people, survey); ^ Rotov M.S. "Management of regional passenger road transportation on the example of the Moscow region)", Moscow, 2004, (N=3010 people, survey);

3 gr. Sociological research aimed at studying the dependence of the population's way of life on the state of the transport service was carried out with the participation of the author in 2003-2006 in Moscow. The sample of the study is multistage. The general population is the population of Moscow, 10383.0 million people1. Sample set: 1640 land transport passengers, 1711 metro passengers, 1422 passengers. train, 443 pas. personal transport. Primary data were subjected to formalized processing on a computer separately for each district of the city and were presented in the form of tables of linear dependence. Correlations and their reliability were determined by Pearson's coefficient. The generalization of the results by districts and their extrapolation to the city was made on the basis of a qualitative analysis of the obtained indicators;

4 gr. in addition, the study used international federal regional and local documents, medium-term and long-term program documents of the Government of the Russian Federation: “Main directions for the formation and development of international transport corridors in Russia”, (2005); Transport strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020; Transport Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2010; medium-term and long-term forecasts of the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, (2005).

Research methods: a) theoretical - structural and functional analysis; comparative method, a systematic approach involving interdisciplinary analysis; content analysis of official statistics, archival materials of previous studies of the State Unitary Enterprise NIiPI of the General Plan of Moscow, reports; b) empirical - selective, survey method (questionnaire "Quality of services provided by Mosgortrans", "Customer satisfaction level of OGT" and focused interviewing of a group of experts "Priorities of competitive selection for the provision of transport services"; express polls: "Public transport: quality, prices, benefits", "Privileges for travel in public transport",

2 Agabekyan R.L. Mathematical methods in sociology. - Rostov-on-Don, 2005. - P.145.

Traffic jams”), observation, methodology for assessing the reliability of UPT services, secondary analysis of empirical data from all-Russian studies “Determining the capacity of the metro and the speed of travel in the metro”; "Structure of time spent on labor movement in one direction" (1980, 2000); content analysis of the document "On the implementation of the provisions of the Federal Law of August 22, 2004 No. 122-FZ in terms of transport accessibility to privileged categories of citizens in 2005 and January-February 2006".

The reliability and reliability of the research results are confirmed by a combination of theoretical provisions with the analysis of official statistics, the results of sociological research. The reliability of scientific provisions, conclusions, practical recommendations is based on the representativeness of sociological and statistical information, the logic of constructing evidence-based conclusions.

The reliability of materials is determined by the use of modern methods of sociological research, the comparability of methods for collecting empirical information, as well as the correct use of methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis in processing data, both from our own research and from research conducted by other authors.

The theoretical significance of the dissertation research lies in the formation and development of a separate area of ​​research within the sociology of management, the sociology of the city, the rationale for an integrated sociological approach, the development of an appropriate conceptual apparatus, which generally determines the degree of increment of sociological knowledge. The dissertation can be used in the development of promising sections of the sociology of management, the sociology of the city. The generalization of theoretical and empirical material makes it possible to study the issues of the social infrastructure of the metropolis from a broader sociological position, corresponding to the tasks of bridging the gap between management practice and its scientific understanding. The dissertation introduced empirical

15 data of the sociological survey “Socio-economic problems of the development of passenger transport in Moscow in 2003-2006”.

The practical significance of the study. The practical significance of the dissertation work lies in the fact that the theoretical generalizations made by the author, the developed multifactorial model and methodological approaches are focused on improving the efficiency of managing flow processes in the urban passenger transport system. The development of high-speed and high-speed passenger transportation will help increase business activity and transport mobility of the population of Moscow.

The implementation of recommendations for improving the management of urban passenger transport, developed in the dissertation, will help improve the level of transport services for the population and increase the efficiency of the transportation process through the introduction of contractual relations and competitive distribution of orders for servicing the UPT route network.

The dissertation materials can be used in the preparation of courses: "Sociology of Management", "City Sociology", "Technologies of Social Work", "State Municipal Administration" in higher and secondary educational institutions that train sociologists, economists, engineers.

The scientific novelty of the work lies in the following: the place and role of public transport in the social infrastructure as an important factor in shaping the lifestyle of the population are determined;

The specificity of the interaction between the lifestyle and transport services in the city is revealed through the analysis of the needs of the urban population;

16 criteria for segmentation of the passenger transportation market and target segment groups of consumers of transport services;

A multifactorial model of choice by consumers of services of different types of transport has been developed;

Analyzed the current state of the transport system of Moscow, its untapped resources;

Recommendations have been developed for the long-term development of the transport system in order to meet the social needs of the urban population, increase the number and variety of its facilities; providing the population with sufficient information about transport services; ensuring their availability and improving the quality of service.

Provisions for defense:

1. The social essence of a person and industrial relations determine the need for information exchange and direct contacts of people in various areas of their activity, which is directly related to transport movements. Transport in the city plays an important role, it provides the possibility of the life of the city as an integral system with its administrative, economic, social and other functions. As the population of the city increases, people's demands for urban transport are continuously increasing.

2. Within the framework of the spatio-temporal extent of social relations, when society is considered as a complex internally structured system, in which each element, including the transport system, can be considered as a subsystem that has connections and intersections with other subsystems, the institutional and sociostructural characteristics of each of the subsystems, can be considered in the context of spatio-temporal facets - internal connections and various levels of interdependence. They can be contradictory or symbiotic, differentiating or integrating, but necessarily having an impact on the results of activities in society.

3. In the development of social infrastructure, one must proceed from the fact that the driving force behind the successful development of a metropolis is not only the presence of a developed transport system, but also a favorable local institutional environment, which becomes a powerful factor in stimulating the business and social activity of the urban population.

4. Criteria for segmentation of the passenger transportation market and the choice of target segment groups of consumers of transport services.

5. The transport demand of the population is an integral part in the system of human needs and should be studied in conjunction with them.

Approbation of the work and implementation of the results. Approbation of the dissertation provisions was carried out at the international scientific-practical conference “Lifestyle of various groups of the population in a difficult life situation (Moscow, 2005, 2006), during 2003-2006. at seminars of the Department of Sociology and Social Work of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, in the author's reports at scientific conferences and seminars held at the Moscow State University of Service "Science to Service" (Moscow, 2004, 2005);

The research materials are used in the educational processes of the Moscow State University of Service and the Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (2005-2006).

The structure of the dissertation. The work consists of an introduction, two chapters, a conclusion, a list of references and applications.

Similar theses in the specialty "Sociology of Management", 22.00.08 VAK code

  • Modernization of the passenger transportation system in the Moscow railway junction: organizational and economic aspect 2011, Candidate of Economic Sciences Murashov, Valentin Aleksandrovich

  • Organizational and economic foundations for the formation of a competitive environment in the implementation of the municipal order for urban passenger bus transportation 2004, Candidate of Economic Sciences Churilov, Andrey Grigorievich

  • Organizational and economic foundations of urban passenger transport management: on the example of the city of Magadan 2007, Candidate of Economic Sciences Romanova, Natalya Aleksandrovna

  • Features of the formation and development of the regional market for urban passenger road transport services 2009, candidate of economic sciences Zakiullina, Elena Alikovna

  • Regulation of the quality of public service by bus transport in the region 2013, candidate of economic sciences Martynov, Denis Aleksandrovich

List of references for dissertation research candidate of sociological sciences Aksenova, Elena Sergeevna, 2006

1. Normative legal acts of the Russian Federation on the organization of transport services for the population of municipalities

2. Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

3. State standard of the Russian Federation "Services - passenger road transport" (GOST R 51825-2001).

4. Law of the Russian Federation of July 6, 1991 No. 1550-1 "On Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation".

5. Federal Law No. 948-1 of March 22, 1991 “On Competition and Restriction of Monopolistic Activity in Commodity Markets”.

6. Federal Law of June 10, 1993 No. 5151-1 "On Certification of Products and Services".

7. Federal Law No. 131-F3 of October 6, 2003 "On the General Principles of Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation"

8. Federal Law No. 2-FZ of 09.01.1996 “On Amendments and Additions to the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Protection of Consumer Rights” and the Code of Administrative Offenses of the RSFSR”.

9. Federal Law of September 10, 1997 No. 126-FZ “On the Financial Basis of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation”.

10. Federal Law No. 131-F3 of 06.10.2003 “On the General Principles of Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation” (effective from 01.01.2006).

11. Order of the Minister of Transport of the Russian Federation dated June 30, 2000 No. 68 “On the introduction of travel documentation for individual entrepreneurs engaged in transportation activities in road transport”.

12. Decree of the Government of Moscow No. 852-PP of 07.12.2004 "On improving the work of adapting the infrastructure of Moscow to the needs of the disabled and other categories of people with limited mobility."

13. Abbas H.A. Methodology for maximizing the profits of a transport enterprise with inflation or credit growth // Business in the financial and credit sphere: Materials of scientific and practical conferences of students and young scientists. Rostov-on-Don, 1998.

14. Abysheva Yu.Yu. Problems of formation of the image of the city: social and managerial aspect: Abstract of the thesis. Ph.D. N. Novgorod, 2005.

15. Avanesov B.C. Tests in sociological research / Ed. G.V. Osipov. - M.: Nauka, 1982. - 199 p.

16. Ageeva E.Yu. City as a socio-cultural entity: Monograph. -N.Novgorod, 2004.

17. Aitov N.A. Problems of planning the social development of cities. -M., 1971.-47 p.

18. Akimova T.V. Systems for investing in passenger road transport in Russia in modern conditions: Dis. . cand. economy Sciences -M., 2003.

19. Aksenov I.Ya. Unified transport system. M.: Higher School, 1991.383 p.

20. Alexander K.E. High-speed rail transport in urban planning /K. E. Alexander, N.A. Rudnev. M.: Stroyizdat, 1985.- 138 p.

21. Altynbaev R.Z. Socio-infrastructural complex as a factor in improving the lifestyle of a young city. Diss. cand. social sciences Kazan, 1994. - 140 p.

22. Altynbaev R.Z. Socio-infrastructural complex as a factor of improvement, lifestyle of a young city. Diss. cand. social sciences Kazan, 1994. - 140 p.

23. Anufriev E.A. Socialist way of life (methodological and methodological issues): Monograph. - M.: Higher school, 1980.- 183 p.

24. Antsiferov N.P. Ways of studying the city as a social organism: An experience of an integrated approach. - JL, 1926.

25. Harutyunyan J1.A. Socialist way of life: methodological problems of sociological study. / Ed. V.V. Stolyarov. - Yerevan: Yerevan University Publishing House, 1985.

26. Babosov E.M. Sociology of management. Tutorial. - M.: TetraSystems, 2000. - 288 p.

27. Batygin G.S. Lectures on the methodology of sociological research. - M.: Aspect Press, 1995. - 286 p.

28. Bedyuk L. Unified control system for ground passenger transport // Automobile transport. 1993. No. 11-12.

29. Belokrylova O.S. The mechanism of commercialization of the production of socially significant services of urban public transport / Ed. ed. N. P. Ketova. Rostov-on-Don, 2004.

30. Biryukov V.V. Fundamentals of economic theory: Proc. allowance / SibADI. Omsk, 1995.- 4.2. Microeconomics. -138 p.

31. Bliznyuk O.V. Dynamics of the social structure of a modern large Russian city: Abstract of the thesis. Ph.D. Saratov, 2005.

32. Big Economic Dictionary / Ed. B. Borisov. M., 2000.

33. Borovik E.N. Trends in the development of social ties in large and largest cities; Review.- M., 1988.- 28s. (Problems of large cities: Overview information,: MGTSNTI; Issue 30).

34. Brun M. National index of customer satisfaction: construction and use //Problems of theory and practice of management. 1999. - No. 4. - P.63-68.

35. Buga P.G. Organization of pedestrian traffic in cities. M.: Higher School, 1980. - 232 p.51. Buneev V.M. Passenger transport

36. Novosibirsk: Problems of efficiency improvement and development. -Novosibirsk: NGAVT, 1999.

37. The time budget of the urban population / Ed. B.T. Kolpakova, V.D. Patrusheva M.: Nauka, 1971.

38. Vaksman S.A. Problems of development and organization of functioning of transport systems of cities // Socio-economic problems of development of transport systems of cities and zones of their influence. - Ekaterinburg, 2002.- S. 10-15.

39. Vasilenko E. A. The mechanism of commercialization of the provision of socially significant services to the population of the city. M., 2005.

40. Vasiliev A. Passenger transport requires an integrated approach. //Automobile transport. 1996. No. 4.

41. Vetrov G.Yu. Indicators of socio-economic development of municipalities. M., 2001.

42. Voronov Yu.P. Methods of collecting information in sociological research. - M.: Statistics, 1974. - 157 p.

43. Ganin A.V. Highways as an infrastructure of a market economy: Theory and practice of development: Dis. . cand. economy Sciences. - Orel, 2000. 166 p.

44. Gatvinsky A.N. Social sphere: forecasts and prospects (on the example of the Saratov region). Saratov, 2001.

45. Geidt A.A. Mechanism and system of strategic planning for the development of road transport infrastructure. SPb., 2004.

46. ​​Gerami VD Methodology for the formation of the system of urban passenger public transport. M., 2001.

47. Gerasimenko V. Modern economy and public goods // Russian economic journal. 1999. No. 9-10.

48. Glukhov A. K. Passenger transport of Moscow as an object of systematic research: (historical experience, ideology, tools): Monograph. -M.: VISMA, 2005.

49. Glukhov V.V. Organization of urban passenger transport in St. Petersburg: Proc. allowance. - St. Petersburg: Publishing house of SPbGPU, 2002.

50. Golts G.A. Transport and settlement. M.: Nauka, 1981. - 248 p.

51. Goncharuk A.P. Management of the quality of transport services in the region based on information technologies: Monograph.

52. Gorfinkel S.I. Urban environment and public resources: Socio-economic interaction in the conditions of market relations. Ph.D. - Saratov, 2005.

53. State report "On the state of road safety in the Russian Federation" // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 2003. September 11th.

54. State and infrastructure sectors in a modern market economy. M., 2001.

55. Grinberg R.S. Theory and methodology of social problems research: Monograph. M.: Nauka, 2005.

56. Gubenko A.V. Problems of development of passenger transport in the region. -Khabarovsk, 2000.

57. Gudkov V.A. Interaction of modes of transport: Proc. allowance - Volgograd, 1994. -104 p.

58. Dazhin S.O., Sharypov N., Moskii D. On the system of subsidies for passenger transportation // Automobile transport. 1996. No. 4. -S.19-21.

59. Dekind J. European social policy: work and public dialogue at the center of the discussion // International Journal of Public Transport. 1999. - No. 6. - S. 13 - 18.

60. Denisov N.A. Social infrastructure of Russia: state, problems, ways of development. M., 1988.

61. Deruzhinsky G.V. Transport service and logistics: Textbook. Novorossiysk, 2001.

62. Dmitriev E. Passenger transportation in the USA // Automobile transport. 2002. No. 11.

63. Drobyshevskaya T.V. Fundamentals of urban policy: Monograph. -Donetsk, 2005.

64. Dudnik T. Rostov authorities began to fight traffic jams // City N. 2003. No. 04 (510). February 29-4.

65. Dulina N.V. The living space of a large city in the perception of its inhabitants: methodology and methods of sociological analysis, Volgograd, 2004.

66. Embulaev V.N. Scientific and methodological foundations for managing the transport system of a large city: Monograph. Vladivostok, 2004.

67. Emelyanovich V., Moiseenko V., Zakharova N. Intelligent transport systems // Connect. Communication world. 1999. No. 4.

68. Efremov I.S. and etc. Theory of urban passenger traffic. M.: Higher school, 1980. - 535 p.

69. Zhivoglyadova JI.B. Theory of conflict of transport and pedestrian flows: Monograph. Rostov on / D, 2005.

70. Ilyukhina JI.V. Methodological foundations for the formation of market relations in the transport sector: Dis. . cand. economy Sciences: Krasnoyarsk, 2005.

71. Istomina O.A. Marine crews: the experience of socio-psychological study, - Vladivostok: Mor. state un-t, 2005.

72. Kazakov Yu.N., Movchan B.S. Development, social: infrastructure of economic regions // Sociological research. - 1995. -№5.

73. Kallagov M. V. Social infrastructure of a modern Russian city: state and development prospects: On the example of the city of Vladikavkaz: Dis. cand. sociological Sciences. M., 2004. - 170 p.

74. Karbanovich I.I. Automotive fuel economy: experience and problems. M.: Transport, 1992.-145 p.

75. Kizim A.A. Transport and logistics: organization and planning of services: Monograph. Krasnodar, 2002.

76. Kizim A.A., Batykov I.V., Belousov A.V. Socio-economic aspect of the development of the regional transport and logistics system: Monograph. Krasnodar, 2004.

77. Kirzner Yu.S. On the foundations of the theory of urban passenger transport. //Socio-economic problems of development of transport systems of cities and zones of their influence. - Ekaterinburg, 2001. S. 16-22.

78. Kovalev V.N. Sociology of social sphere management: study guide. M., 2003. .

79. Kovalenko JT.A. Planning the social infrastructure of the region (on the materials of the Murmansk region): Abstract of Ph.D. L., 1989.

80. Kolesnichenko Yu. V. Social infrastructure in the regional system of life support for the rural and commercial population of the Northern region: on the example of the Taimyr (Dolgano-Nenets) Autonomous Okrug: Dis. cand. economy Sciences SPb., 2005 -201 p.

81. Kondratov V.P. The development of social infrastructure as a factor in improving the quality of life of the urban population: Abstract of the thesis. dis. Ph.D. Kazan, 2004.

82. Konteev V.V. Formation of a strategy for the development of the service sector of the largest city. Yekaterinburg, 2006.

83. Kopchuk N.V. Assessment of the level of development of the social sphere of municipalities (on the example of the Leningrad region). -SPb., 2004.

84. Kosintseva Yu.F. Innovations in the social sphere and problems of innovation.: textbook. Stavropol, 2004.

85. Kostinsky A.V. Plan for the integrated development of the social infrastructure of the regions: Abstract of PhD in Economics - Kyiv, 1989.

86. Kostko N.A. Predictive-normative model of the social infrastructure of the city of Tyumen: Abstract of the thesis. PhD thesis Tyumen, 1995.

87. Kravchenko A.I., Tyurina I.O. Sociology of Management: Fundamental Course: Textbook.- M.: Academic project; Tricksta, 2004.-1136 p.

88. Kravchenko E.A. Fundamentals of quality management of transport services to the population: Proc. allowance. Krasnodar: KubGTU, 2004.

89. Krysin N.I. Managing the development of a single-industry city: Problems, experience, trends: Abstract of the thesis. Ph.D. -M., 2005.

90. Kuksanova N.V. Social infrastructure of Siberia. -Novosibirsk, 1993.

91. Kurakov B.JI. Resource support of the social sphere. M., 1999.

92. Kurakov B.JI. Strategic planning for the development of the social sphere: methodology and concept of increasing the effectiveness of structural components. SPb., 2002.

93. Kurakov B.JI. Social sphere: state and prospects. M., 2003.

94. Lazarev A.G. Fundamentals of urban planning: Textbook. - Rostov-on-Don, 2005.

95. Lobanov E.M. Transport planning of cities. M., 1990. - 240 s.

96. Lola A.M. Fundamentals of Urban Studies and Theory of the City: Monograph. -M., 2005.

97. Lomanov P.N. Social sphere in market conditions. M., 2004.

98. Mayorov B. Vologda experience in organizing the management of urban and regional passenger transportation // Automobile transport. 1996. No. 3.

99. Malchikova A.G. Organization of logistics flows in the system of urban passenger transportation: Abstract of the thesis. dis. .c.e.s. SPb., 2000.

100. Marchenko V. Effective planning of transportation by public transport // Automobile transport. 1997. No. 3.

102. Mirotin L.B. Transport logistics / L.B. Mirotin, V.I. Nikolin, Y.E. Tashbaev.- M.- Omsk, 1994. 236 p.

103. Mirotin L.B., Tashbaev Y.E., Kasenov A.G. Logistics: customer service: Textbook. M., 2002. - 190 p.

104. Mirotin L.B. Logistics: public passenger transport. M.: Exam, 2003.

105. D.N. An innovative approach to the development of the social sphere. SPb., 2002.

106. Scientific foundations of regional socio-economic monitoring / Ed. L.V. Ivanovsky, V.E. Rokhchina: .- St. Petersburg, 1998.

107. Neshchadin A., Gorin N. Phenomenon of the city: socio-economic analysis. - M., 2001.

108. On the reform of urban passenger transport // Automobile transport. 2003. No. 3.

109. Lifestyle of the population of a large city: Experience of complex social research / Ed. A.S. Pashkova. L., 1988.

110. Orlovsky S.A. Decision-Making Problems with Fuzzy Initial Information M.: Nauka, 1981. - 208 p.

111. Osadchaya G.I. Sociology of the social sphere: Textbook. -M, 1999.

112. The main tasks of the development of the transport complex for 2000 and for the future until 2005 // www.mintrans.ru.

113. Main indicators of transport activity in Russia: Statistical collection M., 2004.

114. Fundamentals of applied sociology. Volume 1 - 2 / Ed. M.K. Gorshkov and F.E. Sheregi. - M., 1995. - 200 e.; 192 p.

115. Estimated indicators of the quality of public service by passenger road transport, 2004.

116. Pavlenok P.D. Sociology: Selected Works 1991-2003 - M.: Izdatelsko Torg. Corporation and Dashkov and K0, 2003.-584p.

117. Pavlenok P.D. Sociology: Textbook. - M.: Publishing and bookselling center. "Marketing", 2002.-1036 p.

118. Pavlova E.N. Ecology of transport / E.N. Pavlova, Yu.V. Buralev. -M.: Transport 1998. -232 p.

119. Patrushev V.D. The life of a city dweller (1965-1998). M., 2001.

120. Penshin N. V. Improving the state regulation of motor transport activities in the region: Dis. cand. economy Sciences: Voronezh, 2005

121. Plotinsky Yu.M. Mathematical modeling of the dynamics of social processes. M., 1992.

122. Plotinsky Yu.M. Theoretical and empirical models of social processes. M., 1998.

123. Subprogram "Road Safety" // www.mintrans.ru.

124. Polozov V.R. Social Development: Trends in Modern Russian Society: Monograph. SPb.,

125. Legal basis for the organization of transport services for the urban population. M .: Foundation "Inst. of City Economics", 2000.

126. Prelovskaya A.V. Development of the market of urban passenger transport services in a large city. Irkutsk, 2005.

127. Preston J. View from the UK: requirements for public services // International Journal of Public Transport. 2001. -№1. -S.6-8.

128. Problems of urban underground transport infrastructure development / Umnov V.A., Kharchenko A.V. M., 2004.

129. Pchelkina V.V. Social infrastructure of the village in the concept of renewal of human resources: Monograph. Cheboksary, 2005.

130. Radchenko I.S. Organization of the functioning of passenger transport in the infrastructure of the city. Khabarovsk, 2005.

131. Reforming urban passenger transport. M., 2002.

132. Reforming some branches of the social sphere in Russia. M.: IEPP, 1999.

133. Rogozin D.M. Cognitive analysis of the survey tool. M., 2002.

134. Rodionov A. Yu. Legal basis for the organization of transport services for the urban population. M.: Fund "Institute of Urban Economics", 2000.

136. Rodionov. A.Yu. Organization of transport services for the urban population. M.: Foundation "Institute of Urban Economics", 2001.

137. Rotov M.S. Analysis and modern management of regional passenger road transport (on the example of the Moscow region): Abstract of the thesis. dis.c.e.s. -M., 2004.

138. Rudakova N.V. Social development of large Russian cities: Abstract of the thesis. Ph.D. Irkutsk, 2006.

139. Samoilov D.S. Urban transport. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1983.

140. Sanin I.I. Management of the social sphere in the region: Monograph. M., 2003.

141. Safronov E.A. Comprehensive Assessment of the Efficiency of Urban Passenger Transport Systems: A Review. M., 1990.-21s.

142. Safronov E.A. Methods of rational development of urban passenger transport systems / E.A. Safronov, P.B. Heifetz; MGTSNTI.- M., 1991.- Issue 2. 29 p.

143. Safronov E.A. Scientific and methodological foundations for the development of urban passenger transport systems: Abstract of the thesis. dis. search for uch. degree of Dr. tech. Sciences / NIIKTP. - Moscow, 1993. 44 p.

144. Safronov E.A. Optimizing Urban Passenger Transport Systems: An Accounting Allowance. Omsk, 1985.- 87 p.

145. Safronov E.A. Social assessment of transport systems of cities // Modern project management: Sat. Materials of the International Congress. M.: Alane, 1995.- S. 688 - 690.

146. Safronov E.A. Socio-economic problems of the development of passenger transport in large cities: Proc. allowance. Ompi. - Omsk, 1990. 86 p.

147. Safronov E.A. Transport systems of cities: Proc. allowance for universities. Omsk, 1996. - 237 p.

148. Segedinov A.A. Problems of economic development of urban infrastructure Stroyizdat, 1987. 216 p.

149. Celine B.C. Problems of organizing transport services for the population of the city in market conditions of management: Monograph.-Krasnodar: Kub. state technol. un-t, 2002.

150. Semchugova E.Yu. Operational assessment of the quality of services in the management of urban passenger transport: Abstract of the thesis. .dis. Ph.D. -Khabarovsk, 2003.

151. Sentsova K.A. Development of a marketing management system for passenger transportation in railway transport: Abstract of the thesis. dis. Candidate of Economics, - M., 2003.

152. Service on transport: a textbook for university students /Ed. V.M. Nikolashina. M, 2004. - 272 p.

153. Sigaev A.V. Design of the street-road network. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1979.

154. Silyanov V.V. Theory of traffic flows in road design and traffic organization. M.: Stroyizdat, 1977. - 294 p.

155. Simpson B. Planning for the development of cities and public transport in the UK, France and Germany. M.: Transport, 1990.- 96 p.

156. Smelzer N. Sociology: Per. from English. - M.: Phoenix, 1994. - 688 p.

157. Smirnov A.V. Conditions for the formation of an international transport complex in the Balkans / A.V. Smirnov, E.A. Safronsv // Collection of reports of the International Conference MOTOAUTO 99. Plovdiv, 13-15 October, 1999.

158. Sokolov A.V. Formation of road service infrastructure in Russia: Abstract of the thesis. dis. Ph.D. M., 2004.

159. Sociological encyclopedia in 2 volumes / Guide. scientific project G.Yu. Semigin M.: Thought, 2003.

160. Sociology of transport: Research methods: Proc. -method, a complex for universities that provide training, retraining and advanced training of personnel transp. - expensive. complex /S. A. Smirnov, I. V. Fedorov, M. N. Vrazhnova and others - M., 1997. - 167 p.

161. Sparmann F., Kellermann P. Public transport: organization and financing in Europe // International Journal of Public Transport. 2001. - No. 5. - S. 16-19.

162. Stavnichiy Yu.A. Transport systems of cities. - M.: Stroyizdat 1990. - 224 p.

163. Stenbrink P. Optimization of transport networks / Per. from English. / Ed. V. N. Livshits.- M.: Transport, 1981.- 320s.

164. Transport development strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2010 (Draft program). M., 2005.

165. Tarkhov S.A. City passenger transport of Moscow: Krat. ist. essay on the 125th anniversary of the emergence of M., 1997.

166. Trends and prospects for the development of social infrastructure. -M., 1989.

167. Theoretical foundations for improving the quality of public service by passenger road transport. M., 2004.

168. Territorial integrated scheme for the development of transport in Moscow. M.: NIiPI General Plan of Moscow, 1997. - 94 p.

169. Toshchenko Zh.T. Social infrastructure: essence and ways of development. M., 1980.

170. Toshchenko Zh.T. Sociology of labor: a new reading experience. M., 2005.

171. Transport in Russia. 2002: Stat. M., 2003.

172. Transport in Russia. 2005: Statistical compendium. M., 2006.

173. Transport of Moscow - 2005: Statistical compendium. M., 2006.

174. Transport logistics: Textbook / Ed. L.B. Mirotina.- M., 2002.

175. Transport strategy of Russia: Materials of the scientific-practical conference. Novosibirsk, 2003.

176. Trotskovsky A.Ya. Socio-territorial structure of the region: structure and main trends of transformation. -Novosibirsk, 1997.

177. Usichenko N.G. Organizational and economic bases for regulating the system of urban passenger transport. SPb., 2000.

178. Usichenko N.G. Economics and organization of urban passenger transport: Monograph. SPB., 2001.

179. Ustyantseva N.V. Socio-spatial structures of a large city: urban environment, social strata: Abstract of the thesis. dis. .c.s.n. -Saratov, 1998.

180. Federal target program "Modernization of the transport system of Russia (2002-2010)" // www.mintrans.ru.

181. Federal Target Program "Improving Road Safety in Russia" for 2000-2003. M., 1998. - 59 p.

182. Federal target program "Improving road safety in 2006-2012". - M., 2006.

183. Fishelson M.S. Transport planning of cities. M.: Higher school, 1985.-239 p.

184. Fomin I.A. City in the system of populated places. Kyiv: Budivelnik, 1986. - 111 p.

185. Frolov KV Formation of indicators and standards for the quality of urban bus transportation: Dis. cand. economy Sciences: M., 2005.

186. Hill N., Brierley J. How to measure customer satisfaction? - M., 2005.2 I. Hafter G. Prestige and London transport // International Journal of Public Transport. 2001. - No. 2. - S. 14-17.

187. Cherepanov V.A. Transport in the planning of cities: Proc. allowance. -M: Stroyizdat, 1981. - 214 p.

188. Chernyshov M.A., Novikov O.A. Infrastructure of the metropolis: Logistic approach /RU. Rostov-on-Don, 1995.

189. Chernyaev A.S. Social foundations of transport communications: Abstract of the thesis. dis. Ph.D. Novocherkassk, 2004.

190. Shabanov A.V. Regional logistics systems of public transport: methodology of formation and management mechanisms. Rostov-on-Don, 2001.

191. Shalenko V.N. Program of sociological research. - M.: Publishing House of Moscow. un-ta, 1987. - 64 p.

192. Shevelev V.N. Sociology of management. Textbook Rostov on / D .: Phoenix, 2004. - 352 p.

193. Sheremetova T.G. Forecasting the development of the regional transport system: the institutional aspect: On the example of the Krasnoyarsk Territory: Abstract of the thesis. dis. cand. economy Sciences: Novosibirsk, 2004.

194. Sheshtokas V.V. City and transport. M.: Stroyizdat, 1984.-139 p.

195. Shkaratan O.I. State social policy and behavior strategies of the middle strata. M., 2005.

196. Shlapentokh V.E. Problems of Reliability of Statistical Information in Sociological Research. - M.: Statistics, 1973.- 141 p.

197. Shlapentokh V.E. Problems of representativeness of sociological information (random and non-random sampling in sociology). - M.: Statistics, 1976. - 196 p.

198. Shuisky A. Project management in the development and implementation of federal target programs for the development of the transport system of Russia // Modern project management: Sat.mater. Int. congr.

199. M.: Alane, 1995.-S. 691-693.

200. Shulepov V.I. Social infrastructure: theory and methodological aspects of assessment: Monograph. Yoshkar-Ola, 2005.

201. Encyclopedic sociological dictionary / Ed. G.V. Osipov. - M., ISPI RAN, 1995. - 939 p.

202. Yuferov O.B. Planning of social infrastructure: a sociological approach. M., 1990.

203. Yadov V.A. Strategy of sociological research: Methodology, program, methods. - M., 2005. - 330 p.

204. Yakushkin I.M. Passenger transportation on subways. -M. Transport, 1982.- 175 p.

205. Yakshin A.M. Graphic-analytical method in urban research and design A.M. Yakshin, T.M. Govorenkova et al. - M, 1979.

206. Yakshin A.M. Prospects for the development of a network of urban highways. M.: Stroyizdat, 1975. - 111 p.

207. Yatsukovich V.I., Dukarevich G.V., Roshchin A.I. Organization of transportation of passengers by buses: Textbook.- M.: MADI, 1988.-48p.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for review and obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors related to the imperfection of recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Hosted at http://www.allbest.ru/

ABSTRACT

on the topic: "Development of transport in Moscow"

Introduction

1. The development of land transport in the XII-XVII centuries.

2. The first type of public transport - cabs

3. Creation of rail transport

4. Opening of bus and trolleybus lines in the capital

5. Moscow - the main railway junction of the country

6. Development of the Moscow taxi

7. Metropolitan metro

Conclusion

Bibliography

Introduction

Moscow is dear to all people as the capital, the largest center of industry, culture and science. The life of such a large modern city cannot be imagined without mass passenger transport. I wonder how the transport of the capital developed? What Muscovites traveled, for example, in the XII century. Unfortunately, this topic has been studied very little by historians. More often the description of transport can be found in the works of classical writers.

We learn about the development of transport in Moscow in the XII-XVII centuries from the lecture of Academician V.A. Obraztsova. In his opinion, Moscow is located in a very advantageous place, in the very center of the watershed of the routes connecting the Dnieper, Volga, Oka and Klyazma. The Slavs settled along these rivers. “The oldest light boats - plows could easily be dragged in the Moscow area by dragging: from the tributary of the Dnieper - Vyazma to the Vazuza - a tributary of the Volga, from the tributary of the Volga - Lama to the Moscow River near the present Volokolamsk, and from there - to the Oka", etc.

Naturally, waterways were the main and even the only type of transport communication between Moscow and all neighboring principalities. There was a revival on the Moscow River, various ships with goods and food plowed its waters.

“Overland communication was established only in winter,” writes Academician Obraztsov, “when rivers and swamps froze”

1. Development of land transport in XII-XVIIcenturies

transport russia passenger automobile underground

Land traffic was badly arranged, inconvenient. Moscow streets were no wider than 6-10 meters, in the central parts of the city sometimes pole decks (gati) were laid. Bridges were built across the rivers, but more often they used the ford (Crimean ford, Cow ford, etc.). The first bridges, somehow hammered together from wood, served as entrances to the Kremlin.

The layout of the streets of Moscow followed a radial-circular type, in which all external tracts converged with radii to the city center and were built up on both sides.

“The transverse development proceeded along the ring streets - concentric three rings of walls: the Kremlin with Kitay-Gorod, the walls of the White City and the walls of the Earthen City.”

The history of Moscow's development explains many aspects of its territorial structure and modern territorial organization, the originality of urban development and planning.

Roads led from the monasteries built in the 13th-14th centuries to the city center, to the Kremlin, which later turned into important streets of the city of Moscow. The main streets developed along the main directions of trade roads connecting Moscow with the largest Russian cities of that time: Vladimir, Tver, Novgorod, Smolensk, etc. The following dirt roads diverge from the Kremlin in the XIV-XV centuries: Ordynskaya - to the south, through Serpukhov ; Ryazan - to the southeast, through which Moscow received at that time the predominant part of the bread; Vladimirskaya - to the east; Pereyaslavskaya (and further to Rostov the Great and Yaroslavl) - to the northeast; Dmitrovskaya to the north; Tverskaya and Rzhevskaya - to the northwest; Smolenskaya (Mozhaiskaya) - to the west; Kaluga - to the southwest. These roads gave Moscow a radial structure, and later became the main city thoroughfares.

For royal ceremonial passages, the roads were repaired, even sidewalks were made of boards. Pavements in Moscow began to appear in the middle of the 17th century. In 1646, the city already had 4.6 km of log and plank pavements.

Decree of December 28, 1681 established certain rules for the use of carriages for different classes. “Who and when to ride in carriages, sleighs and horseback. Boyars, roundabout and Duma people in summer - in carriages, in winter in a sleigh on 2 horses. Boyars on holidays in carriages and sleighs on 4 horses, and on weddings - on 6 horses. Sleepers, stewardesses, lawyers and noblemen in winter on one horse, in summer - on horseback, on two horses and in carriages.

Peter I raised the question of the construction of horse-drawn roads, ordering the construction of a “promising road”. The strip for the road was allocated 50 sazhens, that is, approximately 106 meters. In 1704, a decree was issued: to build stone houses in the Kremlin and Kitay-Gorod and place them along the streets and lanes. And in 1705 it was ordered to pave Moscow streets with stone. “All those who came to Moscow had to bring 3 stones” In 1730, along the large streets, it was ordered to put glass lanterns on poles at a distance of 10 fathoms from one another.

2. The first type of public transport - cabs

To move around the city in boats, in carts, the inhabitants of Moscow began a long time ago, almost from the time the city was founded. Most of the inhabitants were more accessible on foot. But Moscow grew and grew. It was already impossible to pass slowly in an hour and a half. It was then that there was an urgent need for public transport vehicles.

The first form of public transport in Moscow was the carriages. Cab drivers appeared in the 17th century. In Moscow, cab drivers were peasants who came to the city for the winter to earn some money. Sledges and horses were the property of these peasants. In the summer, most of the cabbies returned to the village, only a fifth of them remained in the city. Professional cab drivers appeared 100 years later. They already had special carts, more convenient for travel than village sledges and carts.

There are no specific traffic rules: they drive, turn and walk along the street up and down, on the right and left sides, at any speed.

In the 19th century, cab drivers were divided into draymen who carried out freight transportation, reckless drivers - owners of the best horses and excellent carriages, as well as the cheapest - "vanek", mostly the same peasants. By the end of the 19th century, there were already several thousand cabbies. But even they could no longer solve all the problems of transporting Muscovites. A new type of transport was needed - roomy and cheap. After all, not every Muscovite could pay a cab driver a dime.

3. Creation of rail transport

The way out was found in the creation of rail transport - a horse-drawn railway. This type of urban transport was a trailer rolling along smooth rails, drawn by two horses. The horse carriage was two-story, the upper part was open (imperial). Before steep ascents (in the area of ​​Trubnaya Square, near Tagansky Hill, etc.), a couple more horses were harnessed (they were controlled by a postilion). The first draft of the Moscow Konka was put forward in 1862. in 1872, for the opening of the Polytechnic Exhibition, the Konka line was built from the modern Belorussky railway station to the modern Historical Museum. In 1875, the First Society of the Horse-Railway was created in Moscow, in 1885 - the Belgian “Main Society of the Horse-Railway”, which laid the Konka lines along the Boulevard Ring, along the Garden Ring and from the center to the outskirts (to Vorobyovy Gory, to Butyrki, Dorogomilovo and others). “In 1900, the length of the horse tram was about 90 kilometers. The number of carriages is 241. In 1894-1896 Konka carried 47.5 million passengers”

The advantages of Konka in comparison with cab drivers are indisputable: 10 times more people were placed in the trailer, the fare was reduced several times.

But this transport also had disadvantages: the speed of movement of the Konka trailers was not much faster than the speed of pedestrians.

“The journey from Trubnaya Square to Sretenka looked especially original: 4 more were added to 2 horses - in a train, in pairs. A boy sat on each of them. The cortege was leaving. The coachman encourages the horses with a blow of the whip, the boy helps, the counselor calls incessantly, the horse rushes uphill, and it’s a disaster if a pedestrian or a cab gets in the way. The horse-drawn carriage will have to be stopped, and then it is very difficult to overcome the steep slope. The horse-drawn carriage slowly slides downhill and everything has to be started all over again.”

The Konka rails covered the entire city. At the end of the 19th century, the City Duma began discussing the issue of replacing Konka with an electric tram.

In 1895, one of the sections of the horse-drawn tram began to be converted to electric traction - from Strastnaya (now Pushkinskaya) Square to Petrovsky Park - and in 1899, on April 6, a tram began to run along it. Since then, this type of transport has developed rapidly. In 1913, the tram carried over 250 million passengers annually. Tram trains moved slowly (average operating speed about 11 km/h; in 1979 - 16 km/h).

Newspapers wrote that 20 people could fit inside the car, and 18 more on the platforms: 8 on the front and 10 on the back. The highest speed is 35 miles per hour.

“Two of the many tram routes used to have a letter designation: “A” and “B”. Muscovites affectionately called them “Annushka” and “Insect”.

The tram became the only means of mass intracity transportation. The tram network covered the city territory unevenly: on the outskirts, the tram lines were located at a distance of several kilometers from each other, and in the center, where the radial rays converged, a real labyrinth of tram tracks formed. The consequences were not slow to affect - traffic jams began to appear in the center.

Currently, the length of a single operational tram track is 433 km. The total length of tram routes is 840 km. Approximately 890 trams operate on the line (In 1994 there were 620). They carry 1,480 thousand passengers per year. With the development of the tram network, Miussky (in 1903, on the basis of Konka Park), Presnensky, Novosokolnichesky, Ryazansky, Zolotorozhsky, Zamoskvoretsky and Uvarovsky tram depots were built.

4. Opening of bus and trolleybus lines in the capital

The first bus route in Moscow opened on August 8, 1924. it connected Kalanchevskaya (now Komsomolskaya) square with Belorussky railway station. The first bus is described as follows: “a small reddish color...” In the same year, several more bus routes were opened (79 cars). The total length of routes in 1924 was 82 km, in 1940 - 985 km, in 1970 - 2753 km. Now the length of bus lines in the city is 4812 km. There are 3905 cars on the line. Buses carry an average of 36 million people a year.

Among the ground modes of transport, the bus holds the lead. It accounts for about a third of the volume of intracity passenger traffic. Bus routes are most often laid to deliver people to the nearest metro or railway station.

In different years, in order to increase the carrying capacity of buses, the use of double-decker buses with increased capacity, buses with articulated sections was practiced. In recent years, it is modern large-capacity buses with articulated sections that have especially attracted Muscovites using this type of transport. Some buses operate as express trains.

But we do not yet have bus trains, as in the cities of Belgium, Switzerland, Holland, Germany and Poland, since the use of such trains also requires the creation of special lanes for bus traffic on highways.

“The first trolleybus appeared in Moscow on November 7, 1933. Its line ran from the Belorussky railway station along the Leningradskoye shosse to the Okruzhnaya railway.” The entire fleet of cars then consisted of 2 trolleybuses. By 1940, the network of trolleybus lines had grown to 200 km, and in 1970 to 776 km. In 1995, 1,380 trolleybuses operating on 1,764 km of Moscow streets provided trolleybus service for 1,700,000 passengers.

The trolleybus, carrying 19% of passengers, is the transport of the center of Moscow, especially its rings, with separate departure lines from the center along wide and straight city avenues. Although the length of trolleybus routes in Moscow is growing, the number of passenger trolleybuses has been declining since the 1980s, and therefore the comfort of travel is declining. While abroad, interest in the use of trolleybuses in cities is reviving.

5. Moscow - the main railway junction of the country

After the Crimean War (1853-1856), the Ministry of War and the Ministry of Communications became convinced that it was necessary to build railways. There was no money in the treasury, and all hopes were placed on private enterprise and foreign loans.

Engel, a fashionable economist at the time, calculated that the benefit from operating the railways was 24% of the money invested in them. The capitalists Polyakovs, Gladilins, Struves, Gubonins, Shipovs and others voted for 24% of the profits. The existing structure of productive forces determined the direction of construction. Moscow became one of the main centers of this construction. By the end of 1870, the following lines were opened from Moscow:

Moscow - Vladimir June 1861 177 versts

Moscow - Kolomna July 1862 117 versts

Moscow - Sergiev Posad August 1862 66.1 versts

Moscow - Serpukhov November 1866 92 versts

Moscow - Smolensk September 1870 392 versts

Moscow became the main railway hub of the country. Radial railroads largely followed the directions of long-established dirt roads.

But the old roads could not take into account the ups and downs, and the railway tracks required a flat terrain. Therefore, railway stations and tracks were not built in the city center, but using lower areas, to the north of it (Rizhsky and Savelovsky stations), northeast (Leningradsky, Yaroslavsky, Kazansky stations on Komsomolskaya - the former Kalanchevskaya Square), east (Kursky station ) and southeast (Paveletsky railway station). None of the railway lines entered the Garden Ring; all stations are located outside the former Earthen City. If the main dirt roads, and then the highways went to the city center, to the Garden Ring, then the railway center is shifted to the east of it - this is Komsomolskaya Square and the Kursky Station Square located not far from it. Four stations on these two squares pass the main part of suburban and long-distance trains. To the west of the Garden Ring, Belorussky and Kyiv stations were built, from which not only suitable and domestic long-distance trains depart, but also many trains to European countries.

The first test train run from Moscow to Troitsko-Ramenskoye station took place in January 1862. The train was made up of 2 cars. The trip was attended by 30 people.

In the summer of the same year, a train arrived from Moscow to Kolomna. So the suburban communication was opened. In 1928, the first electric trains appeared on suburban lines.

Today, the Moscow Railway has 9 stations in Moscow. The total length of the railway exceeded 500 km. More than 830 million people use railway services annually, including 730 million people on suburban routes.

6. Development of the Moscow taxi

On September 2, 1907, an announcement was published in Moscow newspapers: “Yesterday, the first cab driver appeared in Moscow. Tax by agreement”. This is how the first Moscow taxi appeared. The second date in the annals of the capital's taxis is June 21, 1925, when 16 cars of the French company Renault and the Italian company Fiat went on their first flight from a small garage located in Georgievsky Lane. Since 1932, domestic Gaz-A cars have been used, since 1936 - M-1 (“Emki”) cars and the predecessors of the current fixed-route taxis (on the Garden Ring) 7-seater ZIS-101 cars. In the post-war years (until 1958), the ZIS-110 car was partially used as a taxi. In 1946-60, the main vehicle of the Moscow taxi companies was Pobeda (Gaz-20). After 1960, passengers were served by Volga cars (Gaz-21). In 1971-1973, they were replaced by the Gaz-24-01 and Gaz-24-04 models. The rolling stock of Moscow taxis is constantly growing. In 1995, 400 Moskvich-taxi cars were delivered to the city's taxi fleets. In 1996 - another 750 cars. The Autoline LLP company is developing, which uses 800 Raf minibuses on 150 routes. The route network covers areas of the capital that are insufficiently provided with trolleybus and bus transport.

However, the bus, tram, trolley bus and taxi provided only a partial and temporary solution to the transport problem. Therefore, it was decided to build the first metro in Moscow.

7. Metropolitan metro

Metropolitan subway. The word “metro” denoted off-street, that is, railways laid along overpasses above the streets or in tunnels under them, built only in very large cities (“metro” means metropolitan).

The first of the known projects of the Moscow metro was sketched out in 1901. In 1902, engineer P.I. Balinsky proposed a project according to which the metro was supposed to connect Zamoskvorechye with Tverskaya Zastava (now Belorussky Station Square) by an underground line, and it was planned to run trains through Red Square and at Pushkinskaya Square on an overpass. Before World War I (1914-1918) there were other projects. During the years of Soviet power, the issue of building a metro was raised in 1922. In 1925, a draft of the so-called Myasnitsky radius was developed, but it did not meet the needs of Muscovites in transport and was not accepted. Due to unacceptable conditions, the proposals of some foreign firms were rejected.

The planning of the first metro lines in Moscow was a difficult task for the geography of the city. It was necessary to lay them in such a way as to connect the places of greatest attraction of the townspeople - railway stations, the largest industrial enterprises, and public recreation areas. At the same time, the construction capacity was only enough for the construction of about 10 km of underground roads in 5 years.

The very first metro line ran between the two largest parks in the city, Sokolnichesky and Park Kultury, passing through Komsomolskaya Square with its three stations and the city center. The length of the lines of its 13 stations was 11.6 km, the average daily traffic was 177 thousand passengers.

A special branch was laid to Smolenskaya Square, and soon extended to the Kyiv railway station. The second stage connected two more stations with the center - Belorussky and Kursky, the Central Air Terminal, the largest Dynamo stadium. The third, completed already during the war years, is another station - Paveletsky, as well as the most important industrial complex on the southeastern outskirts of the city. All lines converged in the center, immediately easing the tension of land transport, which made it possible to begin the phased withdrawal of tram tracks from there.

From the beginning of the construction of the metro, its stations were created as a spatially extended architectural complex of monumental structures of great public importance. Prominent Soviet architects participated in the design of metro stations: V.G. Gelfreikh, I.A. Fomin, A.V. Shchusev and others, who sought not only to create the most comfortable conditions for passengers, but also to give each station an individual architectural look. Solemn, major in mood, the art complexes of the metro are decorated with statues and reliefs, monumental and decorative compositions (painting, mosaics, stained-glass windows). The selection of various facing materials together forms a rich color palette. Over 20 types of marble from various deposits of the Urals, Altai, Central Asia, the Caucasus, Ukraine, etc. were used in the lining of metro stations. Labradorite, granite, porphyte, rhodonite, onyx and other materials were also used.

Now the Moscow metro ranks 5th in terms of area and 1st in terms of the number of passengers in the world. Every day, about 9 million people descend into the subway. Today, the length of metro lines is 255.7 km with 9 branches and 150 stations and 4143 cars.

Conclusion

Despite the enormous efforts expended on the creation of a modern urban transport system in Moscow, the city's transport problem is still far from being fully resolved. Of course, now in Moscow there are almost no places left from which it is impossible to get out even during rush hours, from the most remote corners within the Moscow Ring Road you can get to the metro station in 15-20 minutes. But over time, the scale of the task being solved, the needs of people, have changed, and today's Muscovites are rightly dissatisfied with the state of urban transport.

The level of transport services for the population does not meet modern requirements.

First, the urban area has grown strongly. Although land transport routes are being laid to the sites of new buildings, the establishment of normal connections is delayed for decades before the laying of metro lines.

The metro has also lost its halo of modern, reliable and fast transport. Passengers have to spend a lot of time on the trip. Subway cars are overloaded. An attempt to reduce the filling of trains by increasing the frequency of their movement led to line overloads, to frequent failures in the traffic schedule. Unfortunately, the metro train stops in the tunnel frequently.

Thirdly, the long-term orientation of land transport only to the delivery of people to the nearest metro stations has led to the fact that chord transport links have been practically lost even between the nearby outlying districts of Moscow.

Bibliography

1. All roads lead to Moscow. M., 1971

2. To the 850th anniversary of the founding of Moscow. M., 1996

3. Capital transport in the master plan for the development of Moscow. M.: "Knowledge", 1973

4. Transport of Moscow. History and modernity. M., 1973

5. Transport of the country of the Soviets. Under the editorship of Professor I.V. Belova. M., 1987

Posted on AIIbest.ru

...

Similar Documents

    Urban transport. Equestrian transport: cab drivers, carriages. Transport on mechanical draft - steam engines. Electric transport: tram, trolleybus. Road transport: bus, taxi. Underground transport - subway. The value of transport.

    abstract, added 02/24/2008

    The concept and significance of transport infrastructure. Historical aspects of the development of the transport system in Russia. The main problems of the development of the transport system in the Russian Federation. Directions for the development of transport infrastructure. Income from the export of transport services.

    term paper, added 01/09/2012

    Characteristics and directions of development of transport infrastructure in the municipality. Problems of development of transport infrastructure in municipalities in the Russian Federation. Directions for the development of transport infrastructure in the city of Tyumen.

    thesis, added 06/08/2014

    Analysis of the development of road transport as an element of the transport system, its place and role in the modern economy of Russia. Technical and economic features of motor transport, characteristics of the main factors that determine the path of its development and deployment.

    control work, added 11/15/2010

    State regulation and analysis of the state of transport activity. Strategic directions for the development of the transport and logistics system of the city, public passenger transport, technologies for servicing freight and passenger flows.

    test, added 09/25/2011

    The development of tram transport in Russia. Geography of location of tram production. Problems of tram transport and ways to solve them. Development of tram transport in the city of Salavat. The contradiction between the importance of transport and the level of its development.

    term paper, added 08/04/2010

    The emergence of new modes of transport. Positions in the transport system of the world and Russia. Technologies, logistics, coordination in the activities of road transport. Innovation strategy of the USA and Russia. Investment attractiveness of road transport.

    abstract, added 04/26/2009

    The role of transport in the development of the Russian economy. Issues of formation and development of public transport in Russia as a whole, analysis of the activities of passenger transport in the Ivanovo region, identification of trends and prospects for its development.

    thesis, added 06/29/2012

    Transport as a special sphere of society. The history of the transport network in the Chuvash Republic. Existing problems and directions of development of transport. New technologies for the promotion and development of roads. Analysis of the impact of transport today.

    test, added 04/28/2011

    The concept and main goals of the transport system, its functions and significance at the present stage, internal structure and elements. Types of transport: railway, sea, river, pipeline, automobile, industrial, public, air.