Recently, I read the article on the new ideals of beauty, which are still far from the reality of ordinary women: "Plus-Size models: we still lie." The article in the right thesis that the beauty of the Plus-size models has nothing to do with real life, as well as the slogans they have pronounced. We are told that "a beautiful woman is beautiful," but at the same time, the unattainable ideals are imposed again: these are all the same model parameters, just now other sizes, and everything else remains the same: thin, perfectly flattened faces, the proportions of the shape.

Of course, there is a certain percentage of women who have a fat fabric almost not postponed on the face, but this percentage is completely insignificant. Many models simply remove themselves so-called fatty lumps Bisha (due to which they get the shoulder cheeks), make the chin liposuction (due to which the second chin instantly disappears), and then grind the result with makeup and photoshop. Voila - we see the perfect person who is not and will not be at the ordinary woman. Each model is a woman with a figure of type x: she has a magnificent chest, a thin waist, a flat belly, steep hips, long legs and a round poppy. Ideal figure!

Popular

There is no models with a figure of type O when the fat is mainly postponed on the waist and stomach. There is no models with a figure of type T - with large shoulders and narrow thighs. Ordinary models - yes, there are, and Plus-Size - never: we say that the body with a large number of adipose tissue can be attractive only when it fits into a strict standard: Girl, and nothing else!

I read all this, I thought about what is all the same because you want to look beautiful and stylish. And so the question is how good to look a full girl, constantly spinning in my head. Let's try to figure out.


For starters, let's determine the terms. The girls who desperate to fight their weight frankly talk to themselves "fat". Politcore "Plus Size", "large forms" and "full" - for them this characteristics are just the most glossy models from magazines with a size of a little more than standard M, which begin to advertise "big sizes". Here they are for most women - full. And about yourself such women think: God, what I am fat.


Let's immediately agree: in this article and in the comments there are no discussion that overweight is bad. Or vice versa, what you need to love yourself as you are. This kind of "watery" texts is full of runet. I want only practical information here. And yet, the photo is not always very complete women. But I picked up examples of clothing, which allows "Enlargement of Wash."


So, one of the main questions: is it necessary to strive for the form of "hourglass"? Of course, it is the hourglass looks advantageous. But it is necessary to understand that I don't completely convert in any way. And if a slim girl is relatively simple from, say, turn the rectangle to turn into x, then for a complete task it becomes much more difficult.

I personally in life most often come across the complete type of "apple" when a woman has a big belly and massive hips, but often the hands and legs are not very complete, sometimes they can even be called slim. It seems to me that in this case the advice "how to make x" is wrong. All these focus on the waist will actually emphasize the widest place. Here just need to do a rectangle from the figure. All sorts of dismay cardigans will help in this, which should be worn unbuttoned. Then, just visually and the same rectangle is formed. If you leave the ankles and brushes at the same time, the visual brain of the watching will be focused on them and perceive their slightness as the overall harness of your body.


Do not be afraid to wear tight things. For example, jeans. They may look very good even on a major figure. It is important that they still do not drag the body anywhere (a thing to size less will not make you slimmer, but on the contrary, it will emphasize all the folds and disadvantages). And in general, it is better to use such things in multilayer sets.

What I would precisely advised to refuse - from short skirts and dresses. Western bloggers often encounter bows of such a plan. But in life, in the dynamics it will not look beautiful. Plus the length of the skirt visually pulls out the figure, and in case of overweight, it is not necessary to neglect it.

If you have a figure like a "pear", again, it is not always worth striving for the desired x-silhouette. Sometimes it is better to balance the top and make the same "rectangle".

Now a few words about the style. Do you know what is worse for the appearance of a complete woman? Associations with aunt. Therefore, unnecessarily feminine styles and prints can lead to a catastrophe. I suspect that the Kustodievskaya Kupchaikha is not your ideal.


Carefully with silhouettes. Skirts directly cut sometimes can turn you into the nightstand! Better dresses and skirts (if it is about maxi) with a clear trapezoidal silhouette, or a flowing soft folds.

To remove from the cabinet everything that can turn you into a "thick aunt from accounting" (however, these strange knitted pieces do not adverse anyone at all).