First of all, to allocate whether commas. First of all. Commas with separate phrases

The inheritance can get a relative of the deceased testator. This rule was recorded by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and was supported by the distribution of relatives for inheritance queues. The location on a particular queue directly depends on the proximity of the relative communication with the deceased, and the probability of obtaining property for inheritance depends on the position.

Since the inheritance can go through different ways to its future owners, the rules of this transition differ depending on the method:

if a document is drawn up, expressing the will of the deceased - the will, the inheritance passes according to its instructions;
if there is no testament order, the inheritance will get to relatives of the deceased. At the same time, they will call for the adoption of the inheritance in a certain order.

Why should the distribution of relatives in the queues of inheritance:

to streamline the adoption of hereditary property;
in order to establish justice. The closest relatives inherit primarily;
to ensure the maximum probability of the transition of property to the relatives of the deceased.

If there is no one of the relatives of the first stage, then the second, etc. come into inheritance.

In the presence and desire to accept the inheritance at least one representative of the urgent queue, the heirs of subsequent queues do not have rights to him.

If the relatives of the first stage are several, then the inheritance will share between them in an equal relation.

Inheritance by law assumes a one-time entry of all applicants for inheritance located on the same queue.

Who inherits in the first?

The first to acquire the right to enter into the inheritance the next relatives of the deceased testator. In this list, the law defines children, parents and spouse (y) the deceased. If there is only the only one, it will receive a full amount of inheritance.

The heirs of the first stage have a priority right to challenging the inheritance, if it was drawn up dead and violates their interests.

The priority heirs are divided by all the property that has passed to them after the death of the testator, equally. If it is impossible to agree, solve the issues of the section are necessary through the court.

Representatives of the first queue in the design of the inheritance in the notary are obliged to prove the presence of kinship with the dead. This requires to submit documents depending on the status of the heir:

certificate of marriage for the sophisticated wife;
certificate of birth of the deceased testator, it may be necessary when confirming the relationship between him and parents;
certificate of the birth of the children of the testator. If the children decided to accept the inheritance, to confirm their status.

Second line of heirs

If there is not a single representative of the first stage, which would want or be able to take the property of the deceased testator, then the second phase is called. It includes brothers, sisters, as well as grandparents of the deceased.

Heirs of the second stage, at the level with representatives of the first, are considered to be close to the testimonist.

Close relatives pay the state duty for registration by the notary of a special testimony at a reduced interest rate.

The rules of inheritance applicable to the first stage act in relation to the heirs of the second, as well as subsequent queues.

In the absence of all representatives of this queue, the third stage comes into the process, which includes uncle and the aunt of the deceased.

How many inheritance queues exist?

The law defines exactly 7 queues to accept the inheritance. This is stated in Article 1145. Moreover, representatives of the last queue for the property of the testator are not relatives of blood. This is the only queue in which the heirs are considered solely as a result of the adoption procedure (adoption). It is clear that in the absence of all the inheritance queues, stepmother (stepfam), stepdaughter (rations) of the deceased are urged.

As a result, the heirs according to the law are eligible to enter into the rights of inheritance solely in accordance with the queue. At the same time, the farther relative from the deceased according to the principle of kinship, the less likely that he will receive inheritance. If there are no representatives of any queue of inheritance, ready to accept the inheritance, it goes into the ownership of the state.

The Civil Code of the Russian Federation defines two options for inheritance: in the will and by law. And if in the first case everything is clear and the inheritance is distributed according to the will of the deceased, then the inheritance without a will is one of the most complex and controversial topics in legal practice. The main disputes happen at the property distribution phase when the successors are determined and their shares are calculated.

Priority inheritance

The rules of inheritance are enshrined by the "Civil Code of the Russian Federation" of 30.11.1994. (hereinafter - the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), "Family Code of the Russian Federation" dated December 29, 1995. (hereinafter - the RF IC) and other legislative acts.

According to Art. 1142-1145 and 1148 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation identified a sequence of obtaining inheritance. Depending on the proximity of related links, the law allocated 7 lines (queues) of successors. The property is distributed according to the downlink principle when relatives of each subsequent line are called, if there are no relatives of previous queues or they:

abandoned property;
do not have the right to inheritance;
recognized by law by unworthy heirs;
not entered into rights.

The closest in blood and according to the law, relatives include the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to the heirs of the first stage, and it is they are the main beneficiaries.

Who is the heir of the first stage by law

According to Art. 1142 These are children, spouse or spouse and parents of the deceased.

Children

The law equals in the rights of all children of the deceased: both by blood (biological) and law. Outmarid children can also qualify for the selection of a share in the inheritance, subject to documentary confirmation of the fact of kinship (genetic examination). Steyings and steppers belong to the 1st line only in the case of official adoption (adoption), otherwise they are relatives of the seventh queue.

If there is a unborn heir, the property cannot be divided by the moment of its birth (Art. 1166 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation).

Attention! Children remain relatives of 1 line, even if the father or mother, in life, were devoid of parental rights in court.

Spouse or spouse

Husband or wife belong to the relatives of the first stage only in the case of official marriage. If there is no testament, then civil marriage (cohabitation) or wedding do not give the right to receive property.

In the event of a divorce and obtaining a court decision before the opening of the inheritance, the spouses cannot inherit the property after each other.

Parents late

Rerepreneurs include both blood parents and adoptive parents. On the selection of part is not right to qualify the parent, officially devoid of parental rights.

Dependents

Heirs under the law include dependents - disabled persons who are on the content of the testator for at least one year. According to Art. 1148 of the Russian Federation Definents do not have to live on one territory with the deceased.

If one of the main successors died to the testator or with him, then his descendants come up, i.e. The grandson of the testator may apply for property instead of his deceased father.

The distribution of inheritance is one of the most controversial and ambiguous moments in the process of adopting property rights. Many factors affect its result. Among them: the basis of the transition of property rights, the number of applicants, their status and even behavior. And in order to find out who and in what volumes inherited rights and obligations, it is necessary to analyze all concomitant circumstances by taking an excerpt from the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

How is the inheritance between the heirs of the first stage

- without will (by law)

Legislation strictly regulates the rights of relatives to receive the property of the deceased by provisions 63 of the head of the Civil Code. An important factor here is the order of entry into law. The first is the first to know the relatives of the first line, after their refusal, non-acceptance or in the case of premature death (before the adoption of the property) - relatives of the second line or the descendants of the priority applicants on the right of submission, and so on.

In total, the law provides for:

Husband (wife), officially recognized children (relatives or not), parents.
Brothers, sisters, grandparents.
Uncle and aunt.
Relatives of the third degree (parents of grandfathers and grandmothers).
Aunt and uncle parents, children of niece and nephews.
Pie cousins \u200b\u200band sisters, grandchildren of niece and nephews.
Children of the legitimate spouse, husband (wife) of the parent.

In the absence of heirs, the property of the deceased goes to the state.

- if there is a testament

The presence of a valid testament is able to change the legitimate procedure for inheritance - this is also expressed by the exclusive law of a citizen for independent disposal of personal property. Such an opportunity approved ch. 62 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and guarantees freedom of unilateral willing to the following points:

Transfer of property rights to a specific person, regardless of whether he is a relative and legal heir or not.
Depriving the inheritance of individuals or all major applicants.
The coercion of the Interestors to fulfill the property or non-property service in relation to the said person, to carry out actions to achieve a generalized goal (testamentary refusal or laying).
Appointment of the executor of the will.
The division of its assets between close in the desired ratio and quality.
Subdisions of successors for situations where appointed persons are not able to accept the rights, refuse them or died before they are received.

Based on the above, the share inheritance and its composition can be determined by their owner, and access to them is closed even for the closest relatives. At the same time, the testator is not obliged to indicate the causes and grounds for such solutions.

But the legislation approved the provisions that limit the law of a citizen for an independent distribution of their property. In accordance with Article 1149 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, regardless of the detention of the will, the right to the obligatory share is:

children of the deceased under the age of 18 (if there is a mark on the fatherhood of the testator in the birth certificate);
disabled parents, spouse and adult children;
dependents from the number of relatives who were on providing the testator at least a year before his death (regardless of whether they lived together or not);
dependents without the legal right to inheritance, which during the last year of the life of the testator kept them and lived on one living space.

The right of submission

This system is relevant when the initial heir dies, not having time to get the property put it. In this case, part of its part is not divided between all other relatives of the inheritance queue, which he entered, and its heirs on the right of presentation. They also differ depending on the inheritance queue.

The right to represent the queue of inheritance No. 1: Grandchildren and descendants of the grandchildren of the testator.
The right to represent the queue of inheritance number 2: niece and nephews of the testator.
The right to represent the queue of inheritance number 3: cousins \u200b\u200band the brothers of the testator.

Example: After the death of the testator, his son receives the right to receive the inheritance. However, he does not live up to the moment of receipt of the property, and it automatically passes its children (the grandchildren of the testator).

In this case, the issue of separation of property becomes even more difficult due to the fact that if the heir has several own heirs (for example, two sons), the property between them is also divided into equal parts (provided that there is no testament or this moment is not specified).

Example: The testator has two heirs of the first stage: daughter and son. If they get the property (50% each each), so that it is convenient to divide it, it will be enough to agree with each other. However, the Son, who already has two own children, dies, without surviving before the actual receipt of the inheritance. In this situation, each of his children (grandchildren of the first testator) receives 25% of the initial property. It turns out that the daughter of the testator will have the ownership of 50% of the property, and the grandchildren of the testator - by 25% of each. Now, to share the property in a convenient way, to negotiate with each other will have to three people.

Sophistication

In addition to the above, there is a concept as. It stands out automatically when one of the family pair is death. If there is no separate agreement or a marriage contract, then a living spouse receives 50% of the property of the deceased and only then everything is divided between the heirs, including here and the living spouse. That is, in fact he gets the inheritance twice.

Example: One of the spouses is dying, whose property was an apartment. 50% immediately passes the second spouse. The rest of the share is divided between him and one of the powers of the deceased. There are no other relatives of the first stage inheritance. As a result, a live spouse receives 50 + 25 \u003d 75% of the apartment and another 25% passes the parent of the testator.

Mandatory share

This is one of the options as you can get the right to inherit even without the current inheritance queue. In this case, the obligatory share is obtained by disabled, incapable parents and spouses, minor children of the testator, as well as his dependents, regardless of which queue the last belongs. (Article 1148-1149 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). Moreover, even if the specified persons do not appear in the will, they still receive their obligatory share by reducing part of the property of other heirs, despite the data specified in the testament. The exception to this rule is situations in which the property used for a long time another heir, and not a dependent. In this case, the mandatory share can be reduced, but not more than 50% of the amount of volume.

The dependent receives the right to inheritance only if at least 1 year before the death of the testator was dependent on him.

Example: The testator has a dependent who did not live with the departed, but kept at his expense. From other heirs there is only a son. According to the will, all property passes the Son, however, given the presence of a dependent, the inheritance should be divided into two equal parts between them. Suppose that the apartment is inheritance, in which the son constantly lived, but I did not live the dependent. In such a situation, the court may decide to reduce the share of the dependent by 50%. As a result, the Son will receive 75% of real estate (50% of him and 25% of the lobe of the dependent, due to the fact that the latter did not enjoy housing). The dependent receives only 25%.

How the inheritance is distributed after death

How shall the inheritance share between the heirs? Shares are distributed according to Art. 1141 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. If all the successors are alive, they inherit them equal parts, with the exception of relatives inheriting by the right of submission (for example, grandchildren).

For example, if a husband dies, then 1/2 property acquired in marriage moves to the surviving spouse, regardless of other direct heirs. And all that was purchased before the wedding will be proportionally divided between relatives of the 1st stage (including his wife).

In legal practice there are precedents when the spouse survived the spouse received half of the property acquired before marriage. For example, the apartment was bought before marriage, but the wife invested in its repair and redevelopment a large amount of money. The fact should be confirmed by checks on the purchase of building materials, an act of work performed with a contracting organization and payment orders for payment of the contractor's services.

The so-called "preferential right" is also enshrined, according to which a relative, living on one territory with the testator at the time of his death, can receive consideration and furnishings on his share (Art. 1169 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation).

The share of dependents in the inheritance is ¼ of the property.

If the successor of the first stage died, then its part will be divided equally between his descendants. The size of the share depends on the number of successors.

For example, a man and his son died in an accident. Heirs are his spouse, father and mother. The daughter has 3 adult children. In this case, it will go to his wife, father, mother and children's daughter. In turn, children will take their share among themselves to three equal parts.

If the testator did not have time or did not consider it necessary to share his property during life, the rights to it in equal shares are obtained within 6 months after his death. In the case of the inheritance of the application for inheritance during this period, over the next three months, the right goes to the applicants of the second stage, then the third and further on the list. Similarly, the procedure for obtaining a share is as a result of referring to him by priority successors, only in this case the deadlines for the application for their rights are doubled.

In the rest, the nuances of the distribution of assets may differ slightly depending on the type of related ties with the testator.

From Father

After the death of his father, the inheritance is divided between children, his wife and remaining in living parents. As already mentioned, each of them receives the same part and what will be included in it can be defined as an agreement between the heirs and in court.

In the latter case, in the section of property, including indivisible objects, such as an apartment or house, the advantage of the transition to the ownership of the living space will be given to the person who already has the right to ownership of its part, and in the absence of such - living in it and not having another housing.

Here it is necessary to take into account such an important circumstance as the existence of property is in marriage. If it is presented from the joint ownership of father and mother (or stepmother), half, which is not inherited by children and parents of the testator. And this fact does not deprive the spouse of the Father's right to share from his half of the property as an inheritance.

Masives the availability of dependents. They receive property on a par with the heirs of the first stage, even if they are not included in it.

From mother

Property rights and duties of the mother after her death are distributed between relatives and adopted children, legitimate husband and parents. It happens like an inheritance from the Father. At the same time, if one or more heirs refuse their share without instructions, in whose benefit is carried out, its part of the inheritance passes in equal shares to the rest of the successors that have entered into their rights.

In the event of the death of Mother's husband before taking the inheritance, his rights go on the downlink to children, and not only from marriage with the now deceased.

From her husband

The property of the deceased husband is equally with his wife and the other close relatives are obtained: parents and children. All children of the spouse are taken into account, including adopted and not born at the time of opening the inheritance, but conceived with her husband.

From the total number of equivalent applicants, the hereditary share of the widow depends, not counting its legitimate half of the property in marriage.

The right of inheritance is only the legal spouse of the testator. "Civil" and a former wife of such a right is deprived. The exception is the mother of a minor child of the deceased, which is responsible for managing his property until they are 18 years old.

From wife

Widower takes the property rights of his deceased wife on the basis of their marriage certificate. In addition, the ownership of the spouse in equal shares departs the rest of its heirs of the first stage and, if you have, dependents.

It should be noted that the death of the approval on the downlink gives the basis for obtaining a part of the inheritance to his children, that is, the grandchildren of his wife. If they are not, then the share of the deceased inheritant joins the share of the wife of the testator.

Sometimes the death of the testator gives the beginning of disputes and disagreements between potential applicants for obtaining his property. This happens, as a rule, due to the ignorance of the parties on the procedure for the entry into the inheritance and how it is distributed among relatives.

Legal portal HTTPS: // Site / is ready to clarify the question of interest and provide its customers with legal assistance in defending their legitimate claims.

Heirs of the second stage

If there are no 1 line successors or they refuse to inheritance, then the property is subject to section.

According to the law to relatives, 2 lines include: relatives (full) and indiscriminate brothers and sisters of the deceased, his grandfather and grandmothers on both sides.

According to the law "Relatives", brothers and sisters, having a common father and mother, are considered. Increasing brothers and sisters have only one common parent and shall be divided by the Family Code of the Russian Federation on the only-born (born from one father) and the universal (born of one mother).

Summary brothers and sisters do not belong to successors of the second stage even if their parents were officially married.

Applicable and to the heirs of 2 lines, namely: nephews and nieces can get part of the property if their parent (brother or sister of the testator) died earlier than the testator or simultaneously with it (i.e. until the opening of the inheritance).

The property is divided between successors of 2 lines in equal parts.

It is impossible to consider all the special cases and precedents of hereditary right, therefore only general information is given in this article. However, family disputes relative to the inheritance section very often end in court and even the closest relationships are ruined. In order not to lose the rightful right to share the property, seek free consultation to the lawyers of the portal https://ros-nasledstvo.ru/. Our experts respond promptly to appeals to site visitors and provide consultations with all changes in current legislation.

From memo to the corrector - This is a meeting of the most common delusions and errors. Contains unimaginable useful moments of proper writing for everyone who writes and wants his texts to be competent and pleasant to read.

"Commas, punctuation
"In addition," allocated with commas (also at the beginning, and in the middle of the proposal).
In general (without a particle "That") - allocated with commas always (both at the beginning, and in the middle of the offer).

Always without commas:
"First of all"
"At first sight"
"Most likely"
"Like"
"It seems"
"Surely"
"Of course" (if there is "same", always without commas)
"Generally"

Yet:
The comma does not put
at the beginning of the offer:
"Before ... I found myself ..."
" Since…"
"Before as…"
"Although…"
"As…"
"In order to…"
"Instead of…"
"In general ..."
"While…"
"Especially since ..."
"However…"
"Despite the fact that ..." (when there is separately); Before "that" the comma does not put.
"If…"
"After…"
"And ..."

"And" - allocated with a comma only in the middle of the sentence (left).

"Nevertheless," the comma is put in the middle of the sentence (left).

If "however" in the meaning "but", then the comma on the right side is not put.

"In general," (without a particle "then") - commas stands out (including and at the beginning of the sentence)!

"In the end," if in the meaning "in the end," the comma does not put.

Finally, in the meaning "finally" - the commas does not stand out.

"And this is despite the fact that ..." - in the middle of the sentence, the comma is always put!

"Based on this, ..." - At the beginning of the sentence, the comma is put. But: "He did so on the basis of ..." - the comma does not put.

"Indeed," in the meaning "in fact" - the commas does not stand out.

"..., and consequently ...", "..., and maybe ..." - the comma after "A" is not put.

"After all, if ..., then ..." - the comma in front of "if" is not put, as the particle "that" goes on. If the particles "then" are not, then the comma before "if" is put!

"Less than two years ..." - the comma before "what" is not put, because This is not a comparison.

The comma in front of "how" is placed only in the case of comparison.

"Such politicians like Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov ..." - the comma is placed, because There is a noun "politicians."
But: "... politicians, such as Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov ..." - before "how" the comma does not put.

Commas do not put:
"Give God," "Do not give God," "For God's sake," the commas does not stand out, + the word "God" is written with a small letter.

BUT: commas are set on both sides:
"Thank God" in the middle of the proposal is allocated with commas on both sides (the word "God" in this case is written with a capital letter) + at the beginning of the sentence - is allocated with a comma (on the right side).
"To God" - in these cases, commas are put on both sides (the word "God" in this case is written with a small letter).
"My God" - stands out of commas on both sides; In the middle of the offer "God" - with a small letter.

rules
The letter "E" is placed in 4 cases *:
1) in the literature for children and foreigners.
2) in the names of their own (Alena, Mikhalov, Catherine Denovev ...)
3) in unfamiliar words (the river Alentra ...)
4) bucket or shoulder.

* - the letter "ё" can be set or not put - at the request of the editorial, organizations.

In the headlines and subtitles, the point is not put.

University, universities are always small letters.

Names of music albums, songs, disks, movies, works, etc. - are written in quotes.

Foreign words are written in quotes.

Specialcore, companion, photographer, corsche, deputy head - we write in one word and without points (but! It is allowed with points, it is not an error).

Names Own in a nominal sense - "Manilov", "Chikchiki" - always with a small letter.

Etc, etc., i.e., because, so-called. - always written without spaces.

Billion rubles, million rubles, million tons, etc. - The point is not put (8 billion rubles, 35 million rubles, 152 million tons, 161.2 million tons, 209 billion barrels of oil). BUT! Example: 54 million square meters introduced into operation. M housing (after quarter. put "Point" + Space!)

Between the number (number) and the number (5) - the gap is always put:
№ 5, № 10, № 12.
BUT!!! №№ 5 and 8, №6, №10 (ie №№ and without a space) - Such writing is not allowed!

5%, 25%, 100% - always without spaces.
20 percent (between the number and the word is always a hyphen without spaces).
This version of writing is allowed: 20% (without spaces).

Between numbers always put a dash (without spaces): 1-2, 3-5, 25-80, 125-200, 15% -20%, 35-40%, 75.8-80.1%, 7-8 cm, 15-18 cm , 29-35 km, etc.
(15-20%, 15% -20% - both options for writing percent).

The numbers are inclusive up to 10 (ten) are written in words! "For five years this war lasted ...", "Almost four days they did not eat anything", etc.

"One or two", "two or three", "three-four", "five to six", etc. - Figures (in the verbal version) with a difference in one unit - always written through a hyphen and without spaces. BUT!

In other cases - always dash! "One or three", "one or four", "one-five", "one-six", "two or four", "five to seven", "three-eight".

"Student of the 3rd class" is a sequence numerical one. Therefore, "go" is put.
"1st place", "they occupied the 3rd place" - ordinal numerical, so "e" (increment) is put!
"Baby 4 years old", "Boy 12 years old" is a quantitative numerical one. Therefore, no accommodation (4, 12) is not set.

BUT! REMEMBER! In the marine theme "Rank" is written only by a number and without increments: "Captain 1 rank", "Captain 3 Rank", etc. - "Go" is not written.

September 1 is a sequence numerical one. But if after the figure it follows the name of the month, then "go" is not written.
"1st, on Monday, we went ..." - this is a sequence numerical one. But there is no name of the month, so it follows the incidence of "go".

"2009" - if there is the word "year", then the incidence is not written (2009, 2009, this year is wrong!). "In 2009, the following events occurred ..." is the right writing!

"2009" - if the words "year" are not, then the incidence is written (2009th, 2009 ...) - "2009 is marked by the following events ..."

Examples:
In the 20-30s.
In 1920.
In 1920 ...
In the 1930s ...
In the 20th year of the nineteenth century ...
In 1995-1996 ()
From 1990 to 1995 (! The letter "s" after the "Year" is not written!)

January 10. BUT! 10th (without "January") ... Wednesday, 13th, and my friends ...
At the end of the XIX - the beginning of the twentieth century (put a dash + gaps).
Century is always written only by Roman numbers, through a dash, without spaces (XVII-XVIII century, "at the end of the XI - early XII century, but not" centuries ").

Right: 33.5 years. 33.5 years old - wrong!
Right: "150th anniversary" or "150th anniversary".
"150-year-old anniversary" - such a writing is not allowed!

That's right: "Three gold medals" - (as "medal" - female).
"Three gold medals ..." is the wrong writing!

Over the past two years.
For the first five months.
For the next couple of centuries. - End "IE" because - before
For the last quarter of a century. Numeral!
For the last attachment.

"For the past two last weeks," because "Week" is a female genus.
"Over the last two years" - (year - male genus).

"In view of the illness ..." - ply. But: "To keep in mind that ..." - separately.

The verb "suffer" - does not exist. There is a verb "suffer." "I suffered ..."

But: I'm suffering; you are tormented; He suffers; They are tormented.

In what cases "also" is written separately?
"Similarly," in the meaning "too," in the value "so" or if you can throw a particle "same" - written separately.
If "as well" is always joining!

"It's not by chance" - always (!) Written separately.
"There is nothing comparable ..." - always (!) Separately.
"Not right", "not right", "they are not right", "he is not right", "she is not right" - always (!) Separately.
"Not like", "not like", "not similar" - always written separately.
"No need" - always written separately.
"In the middle" - always written in one word.
"Non-imminent" - written in a punk. But: "Not much, but a little bit ..."
"Little" - in the meaning "little" - is written in a punk.
"Despite ..." - always ply. But: he walked, not looking around ... (i.e., without looking around).
"Not quite" - always separately.
"Not quite" ready (adverb). But: "Do not agree with everything ..." (pronoun).
"This is uneconomical" - ply.
I feel no matter. He learns no matter. In other cases, "no matter" - always written separately!
"It is not, ask a question ..." - ply.
He worked a lot. But: he has no friends!
"An impregnable fortress", "the fortress is impregnable" (take the fortress by the attack).
"One of the most turbulent areas ..." - if in the meaning "noisy", then it is written in a punch.
"Understand" - in the meaning "to reduce", "clutter" - in the meaning "to exceed" - always written in a punch!

"I didn't reach ..." - separately, because there is "before".
"He is not redora yet to the ceiling" - separately (there is "before").
"Apparently, the classics did not grow up to our directors," separately (there is "to").

"What he just did not do ...", "as soon as the deputy was not fought ..." - written "not".

In these cases, "With what" always !!! separately:
What am I here?
What is he here?
It's not my fault.
What do I have to do with this?

And this is despite the fact that ... ("With that" - separately).

"I will do it anyway, regardless of anything ..." - (in this case, "from what" - separately, "ne").

Nothing a taught man.

Imagine - in the meaning "show" (always ask questions: What? Who?) "Allow it to imagine (who?) You have a new employee ..."
Provide - always ask questions: to whom? what? - "Provide (what?) Vacation without salary content ..."

"The misunderstandings are seen on ... (test)" - if there is a pretext "on", then "E" is written.
"He was also involved in this fight ..." - if the pretext "B" is written "A".

"The accusation was retrained to a softer" - one "H" (asked the question: what is done?)

How correct: finish or finish?
"He graduated" an educational institution. But: "finished" work.

How to: Dressed or Wear?
Wear (Antony "Remove") - hat, skirt, coat, trousers, costume, dress, shirt ...
Dressed (the antony "split") - a child, a doll.

"For how many rubles", "for how many people" - always separately. The same applies to the word "on so many rubles", "for so many people" - the value "number", "number".
"For so much", "how much" is written separately, if the noun is next.
In other cases, "so" and "as far as" is always written in a punch!

"Not anything else, like ...", "No one else, like ..." - before "how" a comma is always put; "Not that", "No one" - separately and with the letter "E".
"Nothing else helped ..." - "Nothing" is written in a punk.

"Many Turks", "Many Georgians" is right ("Many Turks", "many Georgians" - there are no such words).

Armed Forces, Russian Army (capital letters are highlighted in bold).

Supermarket, supergigant, superlider ... - always written in a punk. "Super" - when merged with any nouns, always written in a punk.

"Army Commander", "Fleet Commander" - ask the question: what?
"Army Command", "Fleet Command" - ask the question: What?
"Store Head" - ask the question: what?
"Starshit, accept the command (than?) Regiment."

"He lives in the grandchildren ... in Domodedovo" - without quotes, + inclined.
If there is a word "airport", then Vnukovo Airport, Domodedovo Airport, Bykovo Airport, Sheremetyevo Airport - In this case, the names of the airports are not inclined, and the word "airport" is inclined ("at Domodedovo Airport" ...)

The particle "Taki" is written through a hyphen:
- After the adverbs: Right, again, still ...
- Verbolov: came, gone ...
- Particles: Still, really ...
But: if anyone (this is the union), the young man is still the same.

Before "not" dash is never put!

"Earthquake by force" in "6 points", "Book worth" in "200 rubles" - the pretext of "B" in such cases is not set !!!
That's right: "Earthquake of six points", "Book worth 200 rubles."

"Power of immanent" - (separately), (nominative case), "Power Pre-West".
"The power of the property" - only the second word is inclined. "I am pleased with the power of the people."
"The Power Primary" - both words are inclined. "I am satisfied with the authorities by the preconditions."

"We are with comrades ..." - meaning: "We went to the movies with the comrades ...".
"Assistrators" - "My companions were with me", i.e. My friends were next to me.

"Place points over I" - English I - without quotes.
"Place the points over" and "- the Russian" and "is taken into quotes.

Monument (who?) Pushkin.
Monument (to whom?) Gorky.
"We approached the monument (whom?) Pushkin" - (two duty cases can not be).

Memorial (whom?) Lenin.
Statue (whom?) Chief.
Monument (what? "Glory.
Monument (who?) Peter.
Bust (whom?)
Obelisk (who?)

Calashnikov machine. But: "He took into the hands of" Kalashnikov "- there is a weapon in mind, + with a small letter.

"Vybradadan" is not a vocabulary word. "Drunk Vybadan" - "B" is written in a punk.

"Vanuyu" - "in" ply.
Kemmet.
Sloped.
Once, moggly.
The lieutenant captain (through a hyphen) - the second word is inclined. "No (who?) Captain Lieutenant ..."

KAMAZ plant. Machine "KAMAZ".
Signor - for Italians.
Senor - for the Spaniards.

Holyava - in the meaning of "sludge, stretching".
Freebie - in the meaning of the Darmovshchka.
Rouple - in the meaning "ridicule."
AR Nouveau (separately) - the meaning of "New Art".
CONNECTURE - The meaning of the situation.
Terrorist attack - (one letter "P").
PERSON OF NON GRAT (without a hyphen)
Military (with a hyphen).
Dehydration (one letter "F").

Santa Claus (in the meaning - man). But: Santa Claus (in the meaning - toy).
Santa Claus (both words with a capital letter, through a hyphen).

Airplanes: "IL-86", "An-26", "Boeing 737".

Winter Olympic Games; Summer games; Sochi Olympiad; White Olympiad, State Kremlin Palace.

Accompanied by officer, the commandant entered the house.
("Commandant" - subject, "entered" is a failed). Therefore, after the "officer" puts a comma.

Cheerful and cheerful, radik was a pet. ("Radik" - subject, "was" - a legend).

Bright memories published under this name - not so much a story as a document.
("Memories" - subject to, but not here). Therefore, the comma after the word "title" is not put here.

Changing machine-recreated.
As - in no way (a hyphen is put).
Print, friendly.
It is not surprising that ... ("not" - ply).
I can't wait (separately, without a hyphen).
Want you do not want (without a refisis, without a comma).
Neither the fig was found (i.e. did not find anything), no fig is visible.

Do not confuse with homogeneous members

1. Are not homogeneous and therefore not separated by the semicol for the following sustainable expressions:
neither
neither fish nor fowl;
neither to settle;
nor the end of the edge;
neither light either dawn;
neither hearing is neither spirit;
neither people themselves;
neither sleeping in spirit;
neither there either here;
for nothing about that;
nor give either
not a response to neither lead;
none of yours;
neither downgraduate;
both so and soyak;
and day and night;
and laughter and grief;
and cold and hunger;
and old and young;
about the fact about

2. Not separated by the comma:

1) verbs in the same form indicating the movement and its goal.
I'll go take a walk.
Sit rest.
Go look.
2) forming semantic unity.
Waiting will not wait.
We will talk to talk.

3) paired combinations of a synonymous, antonymic or associative nature.
Search for truth-truth.
There is no end-edge.
Honor-praise everyone.
Gone-went.
All Shito-indoor.
Long-dear look.
Questions of purchase and sale.
Meet bread-salt.
Tie down the legs.

4) Complex words (questioningly pronouns, adverbs, which are opposed to something).
To someone who, and you can not.
But where, where, and there everything is there.

Basic groups of input words
and phrases
(Allocated to commas + on both sides in the middle of the sentence)

1. Expressive feelings of speaking (joy, regret, surprise, etc.) in connection with the message:
to daily
to amazement
unfortunately
to chagrin
to regain
to joy
unfortunately
to shame
fortunately
to the surprise
to horror
on trouble
on joy
for luck
not even an hour
there is nothing to hide
by misfortune
fortunately
strange affair
amazing business
which is good, etc.

2. An assessment of the speaking degree of reality of the reported (confidence, uncertainty, assumption, possibility, etc.):
without any doubts
certainly
undoubtedly
may be
right
probably
apparently
possibly
indeed
in fact
really
must be
i think
it seems
it would seem that
sure
can
may be
probably
hope
presumably
is not it
undoubtedly
obvious
apparently
in all probability
genn
perhaps
i believe
in fact
essentially
truth
right
of course
it goes without saying
tea and others.

3. Indicating the source of the reported:
speak
sECURE
mOL
transfer
in your
according to ...
remember
to my mind
in our opinion
according to legend
according to ...
according to…
according to rumors
according to ...
in your way
hear
report otherwise

4. Indicating the connection of thoughts, the sequence of presentation:
generally
firstly,
secondly, etc.
however
in particular
the main thing
further
so
so
for example
moreover
by the way
by the way
by the way, to say
by the way
finally
on the contrary
eg
on the contrary
repeat
sharching
primarily
more than that
on the other hand
hence
one side
that is
thus, etc.

5. Indicating the techniques and methods of registration of the thoughts:
rather, say
generally speaking
in other words
if you can say so
if you can say so
in other words
in other words
briefly speaking
better to say
to put it mildly
in a word
simply say
in short
as a matter of fact
with the permission to say
so to speak
to be precise
what is called etc.

6. Presents appeals to the interlocutor (reader) in order to attract his attention to the reported, inspire a certain attitude to the outlined facts:
believe (Lee)
believe (Lee)
see (whether)
you see)
imagine (those)
suppose
do you know)
do you know)
sorry)
believe me (those)
you are welcome
understand (those)
understand (whether)
understand (Lee)
listen (those)
suppose
imagine
sorry)
say
agree
agree, etc.

7. Indicating the assessment of the measure of what is said:
at least
at least
the biggest
most less

8. Showing the degree of normalization of the reported:
it happens
beed
as usual
by custom
happen

9. Expressive expressiveness:
in addition to jokes
between us will be said
between us saying
need to say
not to ukore will be said
to tell the truth
by conscience
by justice
recognize to say
to say
funny to say
honestly.

Sustainable expressions with comparison
(without commas):
poor like a church mouse
white as Lun
white as a cloth
white as snow
beat like a fish about ice
pale as death
glitters like a mirror
disease as hand shot
fear like fire
wandering like robust
rushed like insane
bubnit as a ponol
ran like crazy
lucky, as a drowned man
spinning like squirrel in the wheel
seen as day
squeezing like piglets
lying as a blue megrin
everything goes like oil
all like a selection
jumped like a scrappy
jumped like a stolen
stupid like a plug
looked like wolf
goal like Sokol.
hungry as wolf
far as the sky from the ground
trembled as in fever
trembled like aspen leaf
he is all like a goose water
wait for manna heavenly
wait like a holiday
lead a cat and dog life
live as a bird of heaven
fell asleep as dead
frozen like statue
lost like a needle in a haystack
sounds like music
healthy like bull
know as irradiated
have at one's fingertips
going like a cow saddle
goes next to the sewn
how to go to the water
ride like cheese in oil
swing like drunk
kolya (pegs) like a jelly
beautiful like God
red like tomato
red as a lobster
fasteners (strong) like oak
shouts as jelly
light as pyryshko
flies like boom
bald as knee
like a shower
waving hands as a mill
dreaming like mehowy
wet as mouse
gloomy as a cloud
mruh like flies
hop as a stone wall
people like herring in barrel
drop like a doll
do not see how your ears
him as a grave
it is like a fish
love (shall) as a tremendous
love (shall) as crazy
worn as a fool with a written tube
worn as chicken with egg
needed like air
need like last year's snow
needed as the fifth knitter in the chariot
need a dog fifth leg
sharp as a stick
one as finist
stayed like cancer on melels
stopped like inkopy
acute as a razor
through the day from night
differ like the sky from the ground
bake like pancakes
pailed as a cloth
turned pale as death
repeated as in delusion
go like a nice
remember as called
remember as in a dream
get like chickens
hit as a head
sprinkle
like two drops of water
went to the bottom as a stone
appear
devotee like a dog
stuck like a bath sheet
fall
procuing (sense) like a milk goat
disappeared as in the water
straight like a heart knife
frame like fire
works like Vol
disassembled like a pig in oranges
dispelled as smoke
play as notes
grow like mushrooms after rain
grow as on yeast
drop from the clouds
fresh (s) like blood with milk
fresh (s) like a cucumber
singing like a chained
jerk
coal
listen like confession
watched as enchanted
slept like killed
rush as a fire
standing like iduances
slender as Cedar Lebanese
masters like a candle
hard as stone
dark as at night
accurate as a watch
skinny as skeleton
coward like a hare
died as a hero
fell like milk
fixed like a ram
fixed like bull
mulish
tired like a dog
hitker as Lisa
sly like Lisa
chucks like a bucket
walked as low
walked like a birthday boy
ride
cold as ice
luck as shining
black as coal
black as damn
feel at home
feel like a stone wall
felt
fucked like drunk
walked like a penalty
clear how twice two four
clear as day and others.

More interesting posts:

Hello! Before you ask a question, I looked at your archive, however, the answers differ. Tell me - how is it better to endure the word "prevention" at its very beginning? For me, better preparation, because When transferring pre-disgust in the eye, "disgust" is thrown, which can distract from the meaning, and this is no longer the readability of which they say first of all, When they talk about transfers. Sincerely, Svetlana.

You are absolutely right.


	Question number 259815.

Dear grarota.ru!
In a strange way, there were no five-ten answers to my last questions. Some of the questions were sent repeatedly.
It was possible to think that your portal stopped advising citizens (and " first of all, Media workers ") in matters of Russian language. However, it is seen that the ribbon of answers is conducted. And the answers are regularly given answers to the level of" Mom Soap Rama ". The advice on questions that can be obtained, elementary using the search" ". That's at least the last question in the ribbon, which before your eyes:" How to customize or customs? ". Question for your site rhetorical.
I will try to ask one more question from the same category. Why, by typing in the "verification of the word" blitz, "we see such discrepancies in the rules of writing this part of the word - in different dictionaries? In particular: "Blitturnir" and "Blitz tournament", "Blossinterview" and "Blitz interview"?
Link
http://www.gramota.ru/slovari/dic/?lop\u003dx&bts\u003dx&zar\u003dx&Ag\u003dx&b\u003dx&sin\u003dx&lv\u003dx&az\u003dx&pe\u003dx&word\u003d%E1%EB%E8%F6.
Thank you.