During the Second World War, severe self-propelled units were playing important role on the battlefields. It is not surprising that after its completion, the development of heavy self-propelled guns, one of the main tasks of which was the fight against enemy armored vehicles, continued by the designers different countries. Tem more surprising fact that only a few projects reached the stage of production in metal, and not one of these formidable machines went into the series. AND Soviet Union, in which heavy self-propelled guns were created Object 268, was no exception in this regard.

Limit weight

As in the case of heavy tanks, it was assumed that the promising Soviet heavy self-propelled guns would be very well protected vehicles with long 152 mm caliber guns. The first requirements for such installations date back to 1945, although real work started a year later. They were designed on the basis of tanks Object 260 (IS-7) and Object 701 (IS-4).

For the self-propelled unit based on the IS-4, which had the designation Object 715, it was supposed to use the 152-mm M31 gun developed by plant No. 172, which is the same in ballistics as the 152-mm high-power BR-2 gun. The same gun was planned to be used for the project of a self-propelled installation of the Kirov plant in Leningrad. What exactly it was called is not entirely clear. Some sources indicate the index Object 261, others call it Object 263.

Later, the factory #172 design bureau developed an even more powerful gun, designated the M48. In general, it repeated the design of the M31 and had a similar muzzle brake, but the initial velocity of its projectile was increased to 1000 m / s. For such a powerful weapon, the destruction of any enemy tank or bunker was not a big problem. The same gun was supposed to be placed in the semi-open self-propelled gun Object 262.

The main obstacle to all these plans was the delay in work on the IS-7 and problems with the development of mass production of the IS-4. The last activity on both self-propelled guns dates back to 1947, after which the work was frozen "until better times." Which never came.

On February 18, 1949, the Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR No. 701–270ss was issued, according to which the development and production heavy tanks weighing more than 50 tons stopped. It is natural that after the IS-4 and IS-7 the development of self-propelled units based on them was ordered to live long.

According to the same decree, SKB-2 ChKZ and a branch of Pilot Plant No. 100 (Chelyabinsk) were given the task of developing a heavy tank with a combat weight of no more than 50 tons. The work, which received the drawing code 730, led to the creation of the IS-5 heavy tank. The draft design of the new heavy tank was presented in April of 1949, and already on September 14, the assembly of the first prototype was completed at ChKZ.

It was quite logical to develop a self-propelled unit on the same base, but the designers were in no hurry with this. Still vivid was the memory of how the work on self-propelled guns based on the IS-7 and IS-4 ended. The go-ahead was given only at the moment when it became clear that the 730th object turned out to be quite successful, and its adoption into service was not far off.

SAU Object 116 (SU-152P) on trials. The 152-mm M53 cannon mounted on it was used by the Design Bureau of the Kirov Plant as a base for the guns of the new self-propelled guns

In the literature on the T-10 and vehicles based on it, the start of work on an assault self-propelled gun is usually dated July 2, 1952. In fact, the chronology of events is somewhat different. The fact is that a self-propelled gun is usually made for a well-defined artillery system. And the gun that eventually "registered" on the machine, known as the Object 268, was not even in the project for another 1.5 years after the start of work. But work on this weapon began much earlier.

From this point of view, the history of the new heavy self-propelled guns began back in 1946, when, in parallel with the M31 and M48, the design bureau of factory #172 began developing the 152 mm M53 gun. This gun with an muzzle velocity of 760 m/s was developed for the Object 116 self-propelled mount, known as the SU-152P. Both the gun and the installation itself were built in 1948. Tests showed insufficient accuracy of the system, and the project was closed. Now the SU-152P can be seen in the exposition of the Patriot Park. So, it was this artillery system in a slightly modified form that was supposed to be the weapon of a promising self-propelled unit.


Draft design modified for installation in heavy self-propelled guns 152 mm M53 guns, 1952

Work on the new machine, which initially did not have any designations, was initially headed by P.P. Isakov. The development of the plant was carried out by the team of the Special Design and Technology Bureau (OKTB) of the Leningrad Kirov Plant. The car was designed in three versions at once, two of which differed markedly from the Object 268, which is now quite widely known. The fact that the design began even before July 1952 is eloquently indicated by the dates in the draft designs of the 2nd and 3rd options - April 25, 1952. Already by that time, the main parameters of the machine were known. One of the main requirements for self-propelled guns was a weight limit: its combat weight should not exceed 50 tons.


Self-propelled guns based on the Object 730, option No. 2. By the way, the first heavy self-propelled gun with aft placement of the fighting compartment was worked out by N. F. Shashmurin back in 1944

Option No. 2 of the designed heavy self-propelled guns provided for the aft placement of the fighting compartment. Due to this, the length of the hull was reduced to 6675 mm. The entire bow of the car was occupied by the engine compartment, so there was no place for the driver there. He was put in the fighting compartment, where he was located on the right in the direction of travel. With this arrangement, the review of the driver turned out to be unimportant.

Such inconveniences were compensated by the relatively small reach of the gun beyond the dimensions of the vehicle - 2300 mm. The thickness of the forehead of the felling was from 150 to 180 mm, the sides were 90 mm. The upper frontal hull sheet was only 75 mm thick, but at the same time its angle of inclination was 75 degrees. In a word, the car had quite decent protection. The crew of the car consisted of four people. To facilitate the work of the loader, the shells were in a special drum behind the gun.


Project No. 3, which provided for the installation of guns in a rotating turret, April 1952

The third version of the self-propelled unit looked no less original. By by and large, it was not even a self-propelled unit, but a tank, in which, due to a more powerful and heavy gun, the thickness of the armor had to be reduced.

However, the difference between the Object 730 and the projected SU-152 (as this machine is designated in the documentation) is quite significant. The designers designed the turret for the self-propelled guns from scratch, and for a normal installation of a 152-mm gun in it, the shoulder strap diameter had to be increased from 2100 to 2300 mm. The maximum thickness of the turret armor reached 200 mm. The turret also housed the ammunition load, the size of which remained the same - 30 rounds. The main ammunition rack was supposed to be placed in the aft niche, which made the work of the loader a little easier.

Because of the new turret, the hull also had to be changed, the length of which, compared to the 730th, increased by 150 mm. The thickness of the upper side plates was reduced to 90 mm, and the lower ones to 50 mm, this was done to keep the combat weight within 50 tons. For the same purpose, the thickness of the upper frontal sheet and stern sheets was also reduced to 60 and 40 mm, respectively. A coaxial machine gun on a self-propelled gun was not provided, but at the top it should have been installed anti-aircraft gun heavy machine gun KPV.

Thus, by the summer of 1952, the design of a self-propelled unit based on the "Object 730" had not begun, but had already taken on a well-formed shape. The order of the Council of Ministers of the USSR dated July 2, 1952 rather “legalized” the work on the car, and also made a number of amendments to the already ongoing design work. Around the same time, the self-propelled unit received the drawing index 268, and the theme itself became known as Object 268.

The literature indicates that a total of 5 variants of the machine were developed on the topic of the Object 268. It is both true and false at the same time. The fact is that the two options mentioned above were developed even before the final tactical and technical requirements were received. And they didn't even carry the cipher 268.

Therefore, in fact, we are talking about three versions of the machine, two of which were an evolution of previously developed draft designs. Both of these options in a revised form were ready in December 1952. At the same time, the artillery system, which was supposed to be installed in these vehicles, still continued to be designed.

According to preliminary calculations, the initial velocity of her projectile was to be 740 m/s. Was taken as a basis self-propelled gun M53, which was redesigned using separate components of the 122-mm M62-T tank gun. According to calculations, the total mass of such a system, which did not have an official designation, was 5100 kg.


Option number 4 was distinguished by enhanced armor protection and a more spacious fighting compartment, where there were already 5 crew members

The revised draft of the second version of the self-propelled gun, which received serial number 4, was prepared by the Design Bureau of the Kirov Plant by December 18, 1952. This time the car already had code 268, and J. Ya. Kotin appeared as its chief designer. Outwardly, the 4th option was very similar to the 2nd, but in fact the differences turned out to be significant.

For starters, the hull length was increased to 6900 mm, that is, almost to the length of the Object 730. At the same time, the length of the gun barrel extension beyond the hull dimensions was reduced by 150 mm. The designers abandoned the beveled aft cutting sheet, which had a positive effect on the internal volume of the fighting compartment. Such changes were urgently needed, because, according to the new terms of reference, the crew of the vehicle was increased to 5 people.

The second loader, located behind the commander, became a new member of the crew. The commander himself received a new commander's cupola with a rangefinder, and a machine-gun mount with a "crooked" barrel appeared in front of him. The driver's seat was also slightly altered, which received new viewing devices. The system with the "drum" remained in place, while the authors of the draft design emphasized that due to the large internal volume, more powerful weapons could be installed. In parallel with the increase in the volume of the fighting compartment, armor protection increased. The thickness of the lower frontal hull plate was raised to 160 mm. The thickness of the forehead cutting remained 180 mm, but at the same time, the bevels 160 mm thick were made at a large angle. With all this, the mass of the machine remained within 50 tons.

On December 10, 1952, a revised version of the 3rd version of the self-propelled guns was completed, which received the 5th serial number. The length of its hull was reduced to the level of the 730th object (6925 mm), while the upper side plates were redone, which became bent. The forehead of the hull has also changed slightly, but the thickness of these parts has remained unchanged. Maintaining the length of the hull within the base tank was due to the installation of the V-12-6 engine, which, by the way, eventually appeared on the T-10M heavy tank. Later, the enlarged turret shoulder strap also “migrated” to it.

The tower, designed for 4 people, has also undergone alterations. The commander here also received a new commander's cupola, but the engineers of the Design Bureau of the Kirov Plant gave the curved machine gun to the loader. By the way, both revised projects inherited the installation of the KPV anti-aircraft machine gun.


Option No. 5 differed from the previous option No. 3 by a number of alterations and an increase in the crew to 5 people

Both of these options, however, did not go further than preliminary studies. In January 1953, the projects were submitted to the scientific and technical committee of the Main Armored Directorate (GBTU) and the Ministry of Transport and Heavy Machine Building (MTiTM). After studying them, the members of the NTK came to the conclusion that these projects provide for the need for a serious alteration of the Object 730's hull and therefore are not suitable.

The commission approved for further work a completely different, much more “quiet” project, which required minimal alterations to the base chassis. Of the major changes, it required only the installation of a slightly more compact V-12-6 engine, which, by the way, was also provided for in version No. 5.

A revised version of the project was presented in June 1953. The commission was also presented with a wooden model on a scale of 1:10. And on August 25, on the topic of Object 268, a conclusion was given signed by Colonel General A. I. Radzievsky.

A number of sources indicate that at this stage the design work has stalled, but this is not so. Of course, the work on self-propelled guns was somewhat influenced by the adoption of the Object 730 on November 28, 1953, which later became the T-10 tank. However, work on the car continued. N. M. Chistyakov, who previously worked in Nizhny Tagil as head of the new design sector, became the lead engineer of Object 268. There, under him, work began on the medium tank Object 140, but for a number of reasons the designer left Nizhny Tagil and moved to Leningrad. The general leadership fell on N. V. Kurin, a veteran of the Kirov plant and the author of a number of self-propelled guns.


Draft design of the final version of Object 268, June 1954

There was, however, another reason that slowed down work on Object 268, which some researchers do not take into account. The fact is that the gun, which was supposed to be put on a self-propelled gun, was still at the design stage. Meanwhile, the staff of plant No. 172 did not sit idly by. Following the 122-mm M62 cannon, which was proposed for installation in promising tanks Object 752 and Object 777, Perm gunsmiths in early 1954 finally got to the 152 mm caliber.

Since the design of the M53, a modified version of which was supposed to be installed on the Object 268, 7 years have passed, and the development of artillery in these years has not stood still. As a result, a project of a 152-mm gun was born, which received the designation M64. The muzzle velocity of its projectile was almost the same as that of the M53 (750 m/s), but the barrel length was markedly reduced. Considering that the Object 268's fighting compartment was located approximately in the same place as the T-10's fighting compartment, this was very important. For comparison, the modified M53 had a total horizontal length from the axis of rotation of the turret to the tip of the muzzle brake 5845 mm, and M64 - 4203 mm. With the new gun, the barrel reach was only 2185 mm.


Such a machine was made in metal. Spring-Summer 1957

Officially, the technical design of the M64 was considered by the Chief artillery control(GAU) in August 1954. In fact, the team of the Design Bureau of the Kirov Plant received information on the new weapon earlier. The already mentioned thesis that the design work on the Object 268 stalled by the fall of 1953 sounds a little strange against the background of the fact that the drawing documentation for the machine is dated June 20, 1954.

The drawings (in total, the design documentation contained 37 sheets) show a machine that is as similar as possible to the Object 268, which was subsequently built in metal. Conceptually, the vehicle was very reminiscent of the German self-propelled gun Jagdtiger, which was maximally unified with the heavy tank Pz.Kpfw. Tiger Ausf.B.

The fundamental difference between the two machines was that Soviet engineers managed not only to fit into the dimensions of the T-10 hull, but also to maintain the same combat weight. And in height, the Object 268 turned out to be even slightly lower than the T-10. From previous projects, the car inherited a commander's cupola with a rangefinder. As in the case of its predecessors, the thickness of the hull from the sides and stern had to be reduced, but the thickness of the cabin sides increased to 100 mm. The protection of the felling from the forehead turned out to be quite impressive - 187 mm. Due to the fact that the cabin was expanded to the total width of the hull, it turned out to be quite spacious.

Between past and future

The final estimate for Object 268 was completed in March 1955. At the same time, the terms for the manufacture of prototypes were also approved. According to the plans, the first sample of the Object 268 was expected to be received in the 1st quarter of 1956, two more copies were to be made in the 4th quarter. Alas, it was during this period that work began on a new generation of heavy tanks, Chistyakov led the work on the heavy tank Object 278, and this directly affected the timing of the readiness of the self-propelled guns.

As for Factory No. 172, he completed the creation of a prototype 152-mm M64 gun in December 1955. And in February 1956, after a program of factory tests, the gun with serial number 4 went to Leningrad, to the Kirov Plant.


From the front, the car looked very impressive. Surprisingly, in height it turned out to be lower than the ISU-152

The delay in work led to the fact that the first prototype of the Object 268 was completed only by the fall of 1956. In general, the car corresponded to the design documentation, although some changes did take place. For example, it was decided to abandon the convex roof of the cabin. Instead, the self-propelled unit received a roof that was simpler to manufacture. The car did not have a machine gun with a “crooked” barrel; in its place, the experimental car had a stub. The shape of the cutting stern leaf has also become simpler, which they decided not to make bent. This part was made removable, since the gun was mounted and dismantled through it.

The crew of the car remained the same and consisted of 5 people. Thanks to the successful layout inside the car, it was not at all crowded, it could even work very A tall man. And this despite the fact that the ammunition of a large-caliber gun was 35 rounds. The convenience of the crew was due, among other things, to design features tools. Firstly, the M64 had an ejector, thanks to which it was possible to minimize the ingress of powder gases into the fighting compartment. Secondly, the gun received a loading mechanism, which greatly facilitated the work of the loaders.


Object 268, view from the starboard side

Factory testing of the Object 268 prototype began in the fall of 1956 and ended in the spring of 1957. In general, the car showed characteristics close to the calculated ones. By driving performance Object 268 almost coincided with the T-10, including the maximum speed.

Shortly after the tests, the self-propelled unit went to the NIIBT Polygon in Kubinka. Shooting tests showed that the plant number 172 not in vain delayed the development of the gun. The M64 was clearly superior in accuracy to the ML-20S, which was installed on the ISU-152. The new gun turned out to be the best and initial speed projectile, and in terms of firing range, and in rate of fire.

Alas, all this no longer played any role. It was decided to abandon the construction of two more prototypes of the Object 268, and the first prototype of the machine went to the museum at the NIIBT Polygon. Now this copy is in the exposition of the Patriot Park. Recently, museum staff managed to bring the self-propelled guns into running condition.

If the Object 268 had appeared five years earlier, the chances of it going into the series would have been very high. The car turned out to be successful, quite convenient for the crew and well protected. But by 1957, a whole series of events had taken place, which together made the launch of such self-propelled guns in a series pointless.

To begin with, since 1955, the development of heavy tanks of a new generation (Objects 277, 278, 279 and 770) began, which had significantly more high level armor protection. Against them, even the M64 cannon was no longer enough. The GBTU was well aware that the designers of armored vehicles abroad also do not sit still. It turned out that the promising self-propelled gun was armed artillery system which is already outdated.

In addition, just in the mid-50s, a program to modernize the ISU-152 began, which significantly extended the life of these machines. Unlike the Object 268, which was just about to go into production, these self-propelled guns were already here and now. Yes, the ML-20 was inferior to the M64 in all respects, but not so significantly.

Finally, the production of the T-10 was extremely slow. Loading the Kirov Plant and ChTZ also with self-propelled guns meant further narrowing the already not wide stream of T-10s that entered the troops. In addition, for the production of a new self-propelled guns, plant No. 172 needed to master a new gun.

There was another reason, largely coinciding with why the British at about the same time put an end to their heavy self-propelled guns FV215 and FV4005. The fact is that in 1956 work began on projects of anti-tank guided missile systems. On May 8, 1957, the Council of Ministers of the USSR authorized work on the development of tanks and self-propelled guns armed with guided missiles.

Many will immediately remember the "bad Khrushchev", but let's face it. An anti-tank missile launcher is much more compact than a cannon. Launching a rocket is much easier, and most importantly, it can be controlled in flight. As a result, with a similar charge power, the rocket is an order of magnitude more efficient. Not surprisingly, the Object 268 was the last cannon-armed Soviet heavy assault self-propelled gun.


Draft design of a missile tank destroyer Object 282T, 1958

On this, work on self-propelled guns based on the T-10 did not stop. In the same 1957, the Design Bureau of the Kirov Plant began the development of a machine that received the designation Object 282. It is often called a tank, but in fact it was a heavy tank destroyer. It was created with the expectation of armament 170-mm anti-tank missiles"Salamander", but due to the fact that the NII-48 team could not bring them to mind, the weapons were changed. In the final configuration, the vehicle, which received the Object 282T index, was to be equipped with either 152-mm TRS-152 anti-tank missiles (ammunition of 22 missiles) or 132-mm TRS-132 missiles (ammunition of 30 missiles).


Object 282T on trials, 1959

The machine, which was released for testing in 1959, was strikingly different from previous self-propelled units. Despite such an impressive ammunition load and a crew of 2-3 people, the tank became somewhat shorter than the T-10. And most importantly, its height was only 2100 mm. The frontal part of the tank was redone. In addition, the designers also moved the fuel tanks forward, separating the crew from them with a 30-mm partition. The car received a boosted V-12-7 engine with a power of 1000 hp. Its maximum speed has increased to 55 km / h.

In a word, it turned out to be an extraordinary machine, which in the end was destroyed by weapons. Tests showed that the Topol control system installed at Object 282T did not work reliably enough, which led to the curtailment of the project.


This was supposed to be a revised project, bearing the designation Object 282K. It did not come to making it in metal

In the same 1959, the Design Bureau of the Kirov Plant developed a project for an improved machine, which received the designation Object 282K. Its combat weight increased to 46.5 tons, and the overall height decreased to 1900 mm. As planned, the machine was equipped with two TRS-132 launchers (20 missiles for each), located on the sides. In the stern was 152-mm launcher PURS-2 with 9 missiles. The fire control system was completely borrowed from the Object 282T. In view of the failure to test the Object 282T, work on the Object 282 did not leave the design phase.

On this, the history of designing self-propelled units based on the T-10 ended.

Sources and literature:

  • Archive of Sergey Netrebenko
  • Photo archive of Evgeny Ivanov
  • Domestic Armored Vehicles of the XX century Volume 3: 1946–1965, A. G. Solyankin, I. G. Zheltov, K. N. Kudryashov, Zeikhgauz, 2010
  • Photo album “History of KBM”, 1967
  • Author archive

Guide from XOM9IKOBA9I_PEDISKA on Object 268

Good day to all! In this review, we will consider the Soviet anti-tank self-propelled guns of the tenth level Obkt 268.

Characteristics of object 268:

1. Engine: V-16FN with a power of 800 hp and a 12% fire probability

2. Specific power: 15.69 HP/t

3. Max Speed: 48/18 km/h

4. Agility: 30°/s

Booking:

Hull: (forehead / side / stern) - 187/100/50 mm

Armament:

1. Gun: 152 mm M64

2. Ammunition: 35 pcs.

3. Damage: 850/850/1100 HP

4. Armor penetration: 303/450/90mm

5. Rate of fire: 3.53 min-1

6. GN speed: 26°/s

7. HV speed: 23.625°/s

8. Angles GN: -6…+6°

9. HV angles: -5…+15°

Review:

Overview: 400 m

Communication range:

Communication range: 730 m

Crew:

  • Commander (Radio Operator)
  • gunner
  • Driver mechanic
  • Charging
  • Charging

Expenses:

1. Purchase price: 6100000 silver.

2. The cost of a complete repair - from 21,000 silver.

3. The cost of the AP shell is 1650 silver.

Equipment:

1. Rammer. The 268 is famous for its DPM, so by increasing the rate of fire, we are making the 268 a support and attack tank.

2. Fan. Just like the rammer, the fan emphasizes the advantages of the 268, namely in mobility, rate of fire and speed of the summary.

3. It is very popular to install coated optics as the third module, since the network mask and stereo pipes practically do not work due to small UGN.

Equipment:

1. Rem. set

2. First aid kit

3. Automatic fire extinguisher. And it’s automatic, since the probability of ignition in 268 is already not high, so it also goes down, therefore you will burn less and save more.

Crew upgrade:

  • Commander: The Brotherhood of War, lamp of the sixth sense, disguise, repair.
  • Gunner: Combat brotherhood, sniper, camouflage, repair.
  • Mechanic driver: Combat brotherhood, off-road king, disguise, repair.
  • Loader: Brotherhood of Darkness, Disguise, Repair, Desperate.

Pros:

  • One of the main advantages of 268 is its mobility (mobility). With its speed of almost 50 km/h, the 268 can quickly occupy key points on the map, and enters the battle on an equal footing with the CT supporting them.
  • With agility of 268, there is no need to be afraid of enemy MTs (if they do not knock down tracks), since only LTs can circle in open areas.
  • With proper use of armor, you can get ricochets from the felling, which, if it is adjusted by 70 degrees and the projectile is normalized by 8 degrees, will amount to almost 398 mm of armor. Also, if you stand in the clinch with 268, the NLD angle increases and there is a high probability of a rebound.
  • The 268 also has a low silhouette, which makes it easy to hide among the vegetation.
  • DPM 268 serves as an advantage, since reloading is quite fast and there are no problems with drum reloading like Franz has. PT 10 lvl, so on the battlefield 268 can give out stable high damage when it is necessary.

Minuses:

  • The aiming angles of 268 leave much to be desired. If you are in an aggressive fight and you are attacking from behind a hill, the first damage you get is 268. Also, because of the small UGN, the sight goes astray and 268 spends a lot of time only on the summary.
  • Although the accuracy of the 268 is high, it loses its significance due to the long flight of the projectile. At long distances, it is necessary to take a large lead, and during the flight of the projectile, the enemy can change its direction, which narrows the number of hits from 268.
  • 268 has the worst armor of its classmates, so a hit by artillery or a Brit. PT 10 lvl, threatens to lose all HP at once.

Basic principles of combat tactics:

Tank Object 268 is quite mobile and DPM, which makes it convenient for aggressive actions on the battlefield, such as supporting CTs at the beginning of the battle (from the side or from the rear) or covering TTs. In addition, the low silhouette allows you to take close positions from the allied TT and ST tanks. It follows from this. that on 268 you should not stand in the bushes lying from the base, but you need to take up positions in a timely manner. But it's worth remembering that 268 has weak armor, and you can't go mixed with ST like Franz for example. PT 10 lvl.

You need to keep an eye on the minimap, as mobility 268 gives an easy flank change, so keeping the def at 268 is not recommended. If there was a head-on collision with the enemy, then it is necessary to stand at a right angle to the enemy and at the right time (the end of the reloading of the enemy tank) turn the hull in the direction where the opponent’s muzzle is directed, thereby increasing the armor of the cabin + reducing the likelihood of hitting the optics on the roof. If you come across an enemy CT, then you need to move away from the walls of the building or stones so that the enemy cannot "support" the tank from the side. After 268 does not interfere with anything, you can start firing at the dizzying ST.

It is not worth aiming the LT, because due to the long flight of the projectile, the probability of a miss is high + there is a chance of being detected.

Thank you for your attention!

Object 268

Main characteristics

Briefly

in detail

7.3 / 7.3 / 7.3 BR

4 people Crew

93% Visibility

forehead / side / stern Booking

120 / 80 / 60 cases

187 / 100 / 50 towers

Mobility

50.0 tons Weight

1,431 l/s 750 l/s Engine power

29 hp/t 15 hp/t specific

54 km/h ahead
10 km/h ago50 km/h forward
9 km/h ago Speed

Armament

35 shells ammo

17 shells of the first stage

17.1 / 22.3 sec recharge

5° / 15° UVN

6° / 6° UGN

500 shells ammo

8.0 / 10.4 sec recharge

50 rounds clip size

600 shots/min rate of fire

5° / 85° UVN

Economy

Description

Write an introduction to the article in 2-3 small paragraphs. Briefly describe the history of creation and combat use machine, as well as its striking features and application in the game. Insert screenshots of the car in different camouflages. If a novice player does not remember the technique well by name, he will immediately understand what it is about.

Main characteristics

Armor protection and survivability

Tell me about armor protection. Mark the most protected and most vulnerable areas. Assess the layout of components and assemblies, as well as the number and location of crew members. Is the level of armor protection adequate, does the layout contribute to survivability in combat?

If necessary, use a visual template to indicate the most protected and vulnerable areas of the armor.

Mobility

Armament

main gun

Give the reader information about the characteristics of the main gun. Evaluate its effectiveness in combat based on reload speed, ballistics and potential damage. Don't forget about the spread fire rate: how quickly a gun can lock on one target, fire at it, and lock on to the next target. Add a link to the main article on the weapon: ((main|Implement name))

Describe the ammunition available for the main gun. Give recommendations on their use and on filling the ammo rack.

Additional weapon

Some tanks are armed with multiple guns in one or more turrets. Evaluate the auxiliary tool and give advice on its use. If there are no additional weapons, remove this subsection.

Describe the ammo available for the secondary weapon. Give recommendations on their use and on filling the ammo rack.

Machine gun armament

coursework and anti-aircraft guns Not only do they allow you to fight aircraft, they are also effective against lightly armored vehicles. Evaluate the machine gun armament and give recommendations on its use.

Use in combat

Describe how to play the car, how to use it in a team, and tips on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - don't impose a single point of view, but give the reader food for thought. Tell us about the most dangerous opponents and give recommendations on how to deal with them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes(AB, RB, SB).

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages:

Flaws:

Historical reference

Tell us about the history of the creation and combat use of the machine. If the historical background turns out to be large, take it out into a separate article and add a link to it here using the main template. Be sure to include links to sources at the end.

Media

A great addition to the article will be video guides, as well as screenshots from the game and photos.

see also

  • reference to the family of technology;
  • links to approximate analogues in other nations and branches.
  • topic at game forum;
  • page on Wikipedia;
  • page on Aviarmor.net;
  • other literature.
Soviet self-propelled guns
Based on transport SU-57 ZiS-30 YaG-10 (29-K)
Based on T-60

During the Great Patriotic War Tank destroyers (anti-tank self-propelled guns) with large-caliber guns have proven themselves as real tank destroyers. Therefore, after the end of the war, it was decided to develop an even more powerful self-propelled gun.

The design of the tank began in the design bureau 172 of the Perm plant.

Tank armament. M-62 gun.

In the middle of 1954, work was completed on the development of a 152 mm gun called the M-62 with a two-chamber muzzle brake to reduce the impact when the gun rolled back. In addition, the gun had a tray-type ramming mechanism, which greatly simplified the process of loading the gun. It should be noted that the shells for the M-62 weighed very significantly.

Weapon characteristics

  • The initial speed of the projectile was 740 m / s.
  • Sighting range - 900 meters.
  • The maximum range of the projectile is 13 km.

It is also worth noting that an injector was installed on the M-62, thanks to which it was possible to reduce the gas contamination of the tank's fighting compartment after a shot.
Object 268 or "St. John's Wort" had 35 rounds in the ammunition. The gun had two sights: for direct fire and for firing from closed positions, for which the ZIS-3 was installed


As additional weapons installed on the tank heavy machine gun KPV, capable of hitting not only enemy manpower, but also lightly armored vehicles. Machine gun ammunition was 500 rounds.

Running base "object 268"

Heavy was chosen as the base of the self-propelled soviet tank T-10 (IS-8) with the preservation of all working units. On object 268, it was decided to put a V-shaped 700 strong diesel engine B-12-5. The transmission provided 2 rear and 8 forward speeds.

Instead of a tower from the T-10 tank, an armored welded cabin made of trapezoidal sheets was installed. The frontal armor of the cabin was - 187 mm, which was very "solid" for those times. The side and stern were much thinner than the frontal armor, 100 and 50 mm, respectively.

The driving characteristics of the tank allowed it to reach speeds of up to 48 km / h. "St. John's wort" could travel 350 km without refueling.

The crew was already then according to the classical scheme of 4 people: Commander, driver, loader, gunner.

So why is it such a great example? self-propelled gun not adopted? And I will answer you: immediately after the tests, the United States and England began the production of new tanks, which were destined to become the main battle tanks of these nations. These were american tanks M-60 and English Chieftain. According to experts, the capabilities of Object 268 were not enough for effective fight with them in the event of a war between the USSR and the North Atlantic Alliance. Also one of the reasons was that the "St. John's wort" was inferior in efficiency to the heavy tank T-10.

Therefore, mass production was abandoned, and all further developments of anti-tank self-propelled guns were also abandoned. This ended the era of steel monsters without a tower, which showed itself so well in the Second World War, but was completely outdated by the 50s.

Tactical and technical characteristics:

Hull booking:

  • Forehead of the hull (top), mm/deg. — 120/61°
  • Forehead of the hull (middle), mm/deg. — 120/50°
  • Hull board, mm/deg. - 60 / curved
  • Hull feed, mm/deg. — 50/0°
  • Bottom, mm - 16

Reservation Cabin:

  • Forehead felling, mm/deg. — 187/27°
  • Cutting board, mm/deg. — 100/20°
  • Cutting feed, mm/deg. — 50/15°
  • Case length, mm - 6950
  • Length with gun forward, mm - 9350
  • Hull width, mm - 3388
  • Height, mm - 2423
  • Clearance, mm - 458

Engine, suspension, running qualities of the tank.:

  • Engine - V-12-5
  • Engine power, l. With. - 700
  • Highway speed, km / h - 48
  • Power reserve on the highway, km - 350
  • Specific power, l. s./t — 15
  • Suspension type: torsion bar, with hydraulic shock absorbers in the balancers of the 1st, 2nd and 7th suspensions
  • Climbability, deg. - 32

Object 268 in Cuban. The T-10 is depicted in the background.
T-10 in Kyiv, in the Museum of the Great Patriotic War