The genetic link between humans and animals. Pets. Psychological and emotional connection between people and animals Unusual connection between people and animals

At the beginning of the 20th century, the whole world literally turned upside down. It was a period of crazy ideas, experiments and discoveries. It was during this period of time that it seemed to scientists that they were on the verge of greatest discovery. For the first time, the news that a human and an animal would interbreed appeared in 1909. Biologist Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov told the world congress that it is quite possible to create an ape-man. And, he was not the only scientist dealing with this issue.

Who and when was involved in the creation of the ape-man

In 1910, the surgeons Voronov and Steinakh made the first attempts to transplant monkey glands into humans. The business of xenotransplantation gained such momentum that Voronov had to open his own monkey nursery in the south of France.

Rozanov Vladimir Nikolaevich, a well-known surgeon who operated on Stalin and Lenin in his time, also conducted numerous experiments in this area. He transplanted chimpanzee glands into humans, and it seemed to be a resounding success. Local newspapers constantly published stories about how the glands of the primate can cure dementia, reduced potency and aging. But have these attempts been successful? Over time, the world came to the conclusion that these experiments were just a placebo. That is, the effect that was observed after xenotransplantation was nothing more than self-hypnosis.

Traces of unseen beasts

In the writings of Bernard Euvelmans, a biologist and famous zoologist, there is great amount references to the so-called "Yeti". Whether Bigfoot really existed is still not known for sure. A large number of scientists are of the opinion that the yeti actually lived near human settlements, but there are no fewer skeptics who deny this. Once two cowboys managed to film a female Bigfoot. The famous plot of Patterson - Gimlin, on which a yeti is clearly visible, has circled the whole world, however, here too there were scientists refuting this event. They believe that since it is impossible to cross people with animals, the photos and videos presented by many eyewitnesses are nothing more than a montage.

There is another evidence of the existence of at least one Bigfoot. In the pre-revolutionary forests of Abkhazia, an unusual woman was caught by one prince. Her height was more than 2 meters, in addition, she was all covered with hair and could not speak. Some scientists believe that human-animal breeding experiments could lead to the birth of such an individual. She was forcibly brought to the settlement and for a long time kept locked up because she was very aggressive. There are facts confirming that the snow woman had an intimate relationship with men (people in the settlement) and gave birth to at least 4 children from them. Khvit - one of her sons, subsequently had his own family and children.

Strong workforce

It is known that at the beginning of the 20th century, Joseph Stalin was sorely lacking, having learned that certain animals were carried out in Germany, he also decided not to hesitate. Under his leadership, numerous experiments were carried out on people. Crossbreeding with animals was supposed to help create incredibly hardy, and at the same time quite docile ape-men. In addition, according to scientists, such a creature should have reached full maturity in just 4 years. Stalin planned that the new labor force would not only be able to mine coal, build railways, but also, if necessary, fight.

First attempts

The first experiments of the French scientist Sergei Voronov were aimed at rejuvenating people. While studying in Egypt, he drew attention to the eunuchs. They looked much older than the rest of the men. At this moment, the scientist thought about the influence of the gonads on the state of the body. In 1910, Voronov successfully transplanted a chimpanzee testicle into an elderly English aristocrat for the first time. Local newspapers wrote that the effect of xenotransplantation was not long in coming, and after a while the Englishman looked several years younger. In this case, the question arises: why is this method of rejuvenation not used in modern transplantology? It is clear that this was in fact

Secret experiments of Professor Ivanov in Guinea

Almost at the same time, the Kremlin also began to wonder if it was really possible to cross between a human and an animal? All scientific activity in this area was entrusted to two biologists - Ilya Ivanov and Vladimir Rozanov. At that time, they were already successfully engaged in artificial Vladimir Rozanov, like his French colleague Voronov, performed operations on transplantation of the gonads of chimpanzees. The difficulty was that the demand for transplantation was so huge that the scientist did not have enough monkeys.

In 1926 Dr. Ivanov and his son went on an expedition to Guinea. They needed to capture female and male chimpanzees for experiments. In addition, they faced the task of persuading at least a few to take part in the experiment. Ivanov wanted to try to fertilize a woman with chimpanzee sperm, and a female chimpanzee with human semen. However, finding a resident of Guinea who agreed to such experiments, even for a lot of money, turned out to be impossible. Then the scientist, together with the Kremlin, decided to do it secretly. Under the guise of examination, several African women were injected with chimpanzee sperm. How this crossing of animals and humans ended is unknown. Soon the scientist Ivanov left Africa and went to conduct experiments in the Abkhazian town of Sukhumi.

Sukhumi Monkey Reserve

In 1927, in Abkhazia, in the small and little-known town of Sukhum at that time, in order to cross animals and humans, a monkey reserve was created.

From Guinea, Ivanov brought the first chimpanzees and gorillas, among which were two large and healthy females. The professor tried to impregnate them with human sperm. After some time, the female monkeys died. At autopsy, it turned out that conception never happened. At that time, Ivanov did not yet understand why the experiments were not working. Modern genetic scientists explain this quite simply.

Is it the same with chimpanzees

It turns out that despite the fact that humans and monkeys have a lot of similarities, there are also significant differences. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes for a total of 46. Chimpanzees have 24 pairs for a total of 48 chromosomes. If such individuals produce a descendant, then it will have an odd number of chromosomes - 47. Such an individual will not be able to produce offspring, since the set of chromosomes will be 46 + 1 - one chromosome will be without a pair.

An example of such a barren animal is a mule. It is known that his parents are a donkey (having 31 pairs of chromosomes) and a horse (32 pairs of chromosomes). In science, obtaining offspring from parents who belong to different types is called interspecific crossbreeding. Human and animal can only be crossed if they have the same DNA, similar karyotype and anatomical features.

Therefore, it turns out that the crossing of animals and humans under normal conditions is impossible due to significant differences in their karyotypes. It has been proven that 18 pairs of human and monkey chromosomes are almost identical, but the rest have a lot of differences. The sex chromosomes, which are responsible for the future sex of the offspring, also differ significantly.

The impossible yesterday became possible today

Experiments on the crossing of man and animals, probably, did not stop and will never stop. The scientists found out that Professor Ivanov was right about something. can really bring great benefits to mankind. However, this is not about mutants at all and Bigfoot. Here we are talking about stem cells that can be obtained from hybrid embryos.

Modern medicine is in great need of stem cells, as they can be used to cure many diseases. The stem cell is capable of self-renewal and division, thus creating any cells of all organs and tissues. Moreover, experiments in genetic engineering prove that stem cells in the body are responsible for youth and longevity. By old age, there are much fewer such cells in the human body, tissues lose their ability to self-renewal, organs work much weaker.

Secrets and mysticism of experiments

Despite the huge amount of evidence, there were no fewer mysteries in this area of ​​\u200b\u200bresearch. For example, after the death of Ivanov, all documents and materials on crossing were hidden and strictly classified. The question arises: if the experiments did not bring any positive result, why did the Kremlin classify all the materials? Crossbreeding of animals and humans has always been shrouded in mystery. There is evidence that many women participated in the experiments in Abkhazia. They were voluntarily fertilized with chimpanzee sperm. But it was impossible to find such a woman and ask her about the progress of the experiments. What happened to all those people who participated in the experiments, and where did they disappear to?

IN this moment In many countries, experiments on crossing animals and humans are prohibited. However, does this mean that they are not carried out? Who knows, maybe in the next century science will still see a chimera?

In nature, animals have facts and mutual assistance. There are cases when, on the dying groan of a wounded roe deer and turihi, leaders from the herd returned to their aid. It was even more surprising to see on Wrangel Island how he rushed to the rescue of his brother white bear cub, still a puppy, weighing no more than half a pound, for the first time out of the den. His attack was so frenzied that the catcher could not cope with two such cubs.

Animals are very observant and especially keenly perceive the extraordinary actions that pursue their hunters, to which they react with responses that sometimes resemble intelligent thinking. So, there are cases when a pack of wolves calmly rested in the forest a few hundred meters from the cutting area, where trees were felled, skidders rattled and lumberjacks called to each other. And so deftly these same wolves recognized the appeared hunters and imperceptibly disappeared at the first attempt to impose flags on them, which act on the wolves as an insurmountable obstacle.

Along with this, it was noticed that wolves, like crows, very well distinguish an armed person from an unarmed one. On the hunt, the hunter spends days and nights surrounded by wild animals for months. Therefore, it is not superfluous for him to know some details of the behavior and actions of animals that pose a danger to him. For example, how an old elk will behave when meeting with him during the rutting period, a pig with piglets and wild boars, a she-bear with a cub.

Many consider the bear to be a good-natured, clumsy bumpkin who attacks a person on his hind legs and goes at him, substituting his chest for a bullet. If the hunter hopes for this absurdity, then he will die at the first meeting with him. In fact, the bear is a very dexterous, strong and cunning animal with an exceptionally quick reaction.

At a distance of several tens of meters, a bear can catch up with a deer. An experienced animal husky bear cub even sometimes whines in fear, barely dodging and escaping from the claws of a bear rushing after her. With such playfulness, the bear is endowed with mighty strength, which makes him the lord of the forests. An adult bear is able to kill any elk, and then drag its carcass weighing 3-4 quintals over several hundred meters to a secluded place and fill up with a mountain of logs and brushwood. Along with this, cases of exceptional dexterity are known, when a bear carried away a beehive from an apiary; having found a warehouse with meat in a hunting hut, he did not think of opening the door locked with a log, but climbed onto the roof, turned the roof, broke through the ceiling in the middle and threw more than a ton of meat out of the hut through this hole.

In June, during pantovka, in order to save the meat of the killed red deer from flies and spoilage, parts of the butchered carcass were placed in a pit with cold spring water. The camouflage from above was neglected. As a result of this oversight, crows discovered the pantry and attracted the attention of a bear with their cry. The beast pulled all the meat out of the water. He used a little himself, the rest was stolen by wolverines and crows.

If the bears are not pursued, they are not afraid of humans, boldly take a fresh bait, go to feed on oat fields and can plunder a storehouse with food. In other areas, for example, on the Kola Peninsula, where reindeer herders chase bears, they behave differently. They visit the bait at night and very carefully go around it in a circle for a hundred steps and approach it from the leeward side, making sure that there is no danger at all. When examining bear grass or bait, the hunter must be well-armed and very cautious, since the bear is often nearby, guards its prey and can attack suddenly and with lightning speed.

A wounded bear, wild boar, elk and some other large animals are very aggressive and dangerous. A wolf and a jackal caught in a trap, if handled carelessly, can severely injure the catcher. Therefore, when coming into contact with wild animals, one must always anticipate all sorts of surprises, since the actions of animals in trouble are unpredictable, lightning fast and of incredible strength. In such cases, the animals are especially deceitful. So, a bear, a wild boar or a tiger with a trap on its leg or wounded, noticing that a hunter is chasing them, as a rule, ambush him - they return by the side and hide in the thicket near their trail, from where they are the first to pounce on the hunter(sick and wounded tigers become cannibals - website author's note).

In turn, unexpected decisive actions of a person that do not correspond to the situation that has arisen can cause confusion in the attacking animal and inhibition of aggression. There was a case in the Moscow Zoo when a servant with a broom entered the enclosure with an African ostrich. The ostrich immediately rushed at him and with a blow of his paw(probably, the author of the book means the powerful two-toed foot of an ostrich - a note by the author of the website) could have killed, but the attendant did not lose his head and raised a broom with his outstretched hand, which turned out to be much higher than the ostrich. The bird instantly appreciated such "growth" of the enemy, stopped and, having fluffed out its feathers, moved back. Knowing about this case, I had to use something similar at the time of the attack on me by a wild elk, which stopped at 3 m - then I opened both floors of the soldier's overcoat to its full extent. The beast lowered its head with its ears flattened, the fur that rose up on the back of its neck subsided, and the elk, turning aside, disappeared into the thicket.

You need to be very careful and prudent when untangling and tying the legs of a deer or tur and other ungulates that have fallen into the net, which can, with a sharp jerk of the head or hind leg, break the bone of the catcher’s arm or leg, and the kulan or wild boar caught in the net can also bite cruelly.

Wild animals perceive aggressive actions of a person with particular acuteness and remember them for a long time. For example, calmly floating wild ducks, having heard a shot that thundered a kilometer from them, they instantly become alert and freeze with their heads up on their outstretched necks. The fattening moose, having heard a distant doublet, also stop feeding and fuss anxiously. On Taimyr on the river. Pyasina, where thousands of reindeer are shot annually from motor boats at water crossings, 2 km away, on the way to the deer crossing, a roar outboard motor caused panic among a whole herd of deer. The animals huddled together, then the old lady jumped out to the side and led the whole herd headlong away from the river.

In Pereslavl hunting hunting for deer and wild boars "from the entrance" from an all-terrain vehicle was practiced. With the advent of this machine in the forest, all deer, wild boars and roe deer fled for several hundred meters. This was explained by the fact that the animals revived in their memory the further actions of a person connected with the noise of the engine - shots and bloodied animals writhing in death convulsions. All this caused forest dwellers panic fear.

Animals have a completely different attitude towards the operation of a motor that does not harm them. So, in the desert region of Parapamiza, with the help of a gas engine, water was pumped from a well into a pool - a drinking bowl intended for wild ungulates. At the noise of this motor, urials descended from the cliffs, and gazelles also gathered around.

Kindness, kindness and animal nutrition radically change their attitude towards a person. So, in city parks, taking care of squirrels turns them into completely tame animals. Without the slightest fear, they climb onto the knees of visitors; sit on their palms and peel the sunflower seeds offered to them. In Abkhazia on the lake. Bibi-Syri, during the free breeding of nutrias, their regular feeding led to the fact that behind the boat with the sternman, rattling bucket, the nutrias swam in a crowd to the feeding rafts with live traps, where they were given food. The most tamed animals went ashore and followed the helmsman almost to the very hut, begging for tasty handouts there.

On Medny Island, regular feeding of arctic foxes also made them tame. S.V. Marakov observed an amazing picture when in November and December (pre-fishing days) in various parts Medny Island and especially in the village of Preobrazhensky at the same time (about 3 o’clock in the afternoon) the fisherman, dragging a smelling slut behind him on a rope, walked through the whole village and whistled into a police whistle. As soon as the first sounds were heard, wild blue foxes rushed from different parts, from the tundra and the coast, tails up. Surrounding a person, they then calmly and imperturbably walked along the streets under the windows of houses, almost clinging to their feet, in a close bunch (120-150 animals) to the very place where food was given in the trap feeder. And so from day to day until the capture, usually starting from the first days of January.

And in the Pereslavl hunting farm, well-organized regular feeding of ungulates led to the fact that when the huntsman carried food on a horse in a sleigh, he was always followed by several dozen deer, roe deer and wild boars at 20-30 paces.

The examples given testify to the possibility of grafting many hoofed and fur-bearing animals to such an extent that they are not chased through the wilds of the forest and urems, but, at the request of the hunter, are forced to come to the designated points to live-feeding traps. For such management of animals, it is necessary to constantly study and know well all the signs of their life activity and habits.

http://wander.org.ru/hunting_animals1.html

As the facts irrefutably testify, there was a time when people did not exist on Earth - they once appeared on it. And along with them inevitably appeared human society. People always live only as part of separate concrete societies - socio-historical organisms, which together form a human society as a whole. Outside the system of social relations, people cannot exist. This has been noted for a long time. Even Aristotle, who lived in the IV century. BC, called a person a political animal, that is, living in a state (polity), in society. This idea was developed in the work of the Scottish thinker A. Ferguson "Essay on the history civil society"(1767). He argued that man was originally, by nature, a social being. "Humanity," he wrote, "should be considered in groups in which it has always existed. The history of an individual is only a single manifestation of the feelings and thoughts acquired by him in connection with his race, and every study related to this subject should come from whole societies, and not individual people. "The opinions that people have always lived in societies, his contemporary, Voltaire, also defended it, in his Philosophy of History (1765) he wrote: “The foundations for society have always existed, and therefore society has always existed.”

But if a person and society have arisen, then the question of where they go with their roots is legitimate. The natural answer is that the origins of man and society must be sought in the animal world. However, there is too much difference between the society in which we live now and the world of animals. huge cities, multi-story houses, factories and factories, railways, cars, planes, theaters, museums, books, magazines, newspapers - there is nothing similar in the animal world. Not only modern, but in general any “civilized”, as they say, society differs from the animal world.

Related to this is the rather common idea that man has nothing to do with animals at all. They refer to biblical traditions, according to which people were created by God separately from animals. In recent decades, this idea finds expression in a variety of fantastic hypotheses, according to which the ancestors modern people came to earth from space.

In reality, however, the relationship between animals and man is undeniable. Some scholars came to this conclusion as early as the 18th century. And in the next - XIX century. - The idea of ​​the origin of man from animals has become widespread. It was, as you know, deeply substantiated in the work of the great English naturalist Charles Darwin "The Origin of Man and Sexual Selection" (1871). It quite convincingly showed that the distant ancestors of man were apes (anthropoids).

Ch.Darwin also touched upon the problem of the origin of society. He characterized man as a social animal. From this he concluded that the ancestors of man also did not live alone or even in families, but in wider associations. But having proved that man originated from animals, Ch. Darwin at the same time could not draw a concrete picture of the transformation of an animal into a man - for this he lacked factual data. He could say even less about the emergence of human society.

By now, the situation has changed dramatically. Science has accumulated a huge amount of factual material related to this problem. In the light of this material, it became clear that between the immediate animal ancestors of man, on the one hand, and people, such as they are now - people modern type On the other hand, there is a long transitional period that began at least 1.6 million years ago.

It was a period of transformation of an animal into a man, the formation of man (anthropogenesis) and at the same time the period of the formation of human society (sociogenesis). Anthropogenesis (from Greek anthropos - man and genesis - origin) and sociogenesis (from Latin societas - society and Greek genesis - origin) were two inextricably related parties one single process - anthroposociogenesis - the process of the formation of man and society. The people who lived during this period differed both from animals and from people of the modern type. These were emerging people (primal people). Accordingly, they lived in an emerging society (pra-society).

The process of anthropogenesis and sociogenesis, which began 1.6 million years ago, ended approximately 35-40 thousand years ago. The pre-humans and the pre-society were replaced by the formed, ready people who lived in a ready, established society.

How exactly the process of the formation of man went can be judged by the bone remains of the animal ancestors of man, proto-humans and the earliest modern people that have come down to us. They are studied by paleoanthropology (from the Greek palayos - ancient, anthropos - man, logos - teaching).

Social relations are immaterial, incorporeal, they have no physical existence. Therefore, in fact, nothing came to us from them and could not reach us. It is possible to judge how the process of formation of society proceeded only by indirect data. Such data, on the one hand, are the same bone remains of the forefathers, on the other hand, their stone tools and other material monuments that have come down to us. They are explored by archeology (from the Greek archaios - ancient, logos - teaching).

But even direct data can be interpreted in different ways. Various scientists paint a picture of the formation of man and the evolution of his stone tools far from the same. This is especially true for indirect data. Therefore, the only way to understand the essence of sociogenesis is to compare its starting point and the end result.

The starting point of sociogenesis is the association of human animal ancestors. A certain idea about them can be formed by studying the associations of currently existing animals. The end result of sociogenesis is the established human society. It exists in different forms. One of public forms earlier, others later. The most early form the existence of an established human society - a society that we usually call primitive or primitive communal, and in Western science - primitive (primitive), tribal (tribal), egalitarian (egalitarian), stateless (stateless), classless (classless). It existed in the form a large number largely completely independent primitive communities.

Comparison of associations of animals and primitive communities can provide a key to understanding what the process of sociogenesis was.

Animals and their associations

Of all the sciences of the animal world, the one that studies the behavior of animals in natural or close to natural conditions is the most interesting for us. It is called ethology (from the Greek ethos - character, temper and logos - teaching). This science has revealed the stimuli and motives of animal behavior. They are biological instincts. These primarily include food, sexual and self-preservation instinct. A special place is occupied by the instinct that prompts to take care of offspring. It is called maternal when only the female takes care of the cubs, and parental when the male is involved in this matter.

Maternal or parental instinct is the only need in the animal world, the satisfaction of which consists in caring for others. All other instincts of a given animal individual presuppose and require his concern only for himself. This is especially easy to see in the example of the food instinct. In an adult animal, this instinct can be satisfied in one and only one way - by providing food for itself. He directly encourages one thing - to search for food for himself and only for himself. If the animal then finds enough food that it is enough for others, or if another animal takes possession of the food found, then this does not in the least change the general direction of its behavior. It is focused on caring only for yourself. In this sense, the food instinct is an individualistic instinct. The sexual instinct and the instinct of self-preservation have the same character.

Individualistic instincts determine the behavior of the animal in all spheres of its activity, excluding only the area of ​​relations with the cubs. Therefore, it is quite legitimate to speak of the dominance in the animal world, taken as a whole, of zoological individualism. Animal egoism, i.e. Orientation towards the satisfaction of one's individualistic instincts not only does not exclude, but, on the contrary, under certain conditions inevitably presupposes the unification of animals. Where animals alone are unable to satisfy their instincts, including individualistic ones, they unite for joint activities. In conditions where joint hunting is more successful than single hunting, wolves and wild dogs form packs. The danger posed by predators encourages monkeys to unite in herds.

The desire of an animal to satisfy its instincts may be consistent with the same aspirations of other individuals of the same species, or may come into conflict with them. Whereas, in animals leading a solitary lifestyle, the clash of the strivings of individual individuals occurs from time to time, while in animals living in associations, this kind of contradiction is more or less permanent. That's why necessary condition the existence of any stable zoological association - the systematic harmonization of the clashing aspirations of all the animals that make up them. It is carried out by dominance.

Dominance is that kind of relationship between two animals in which one animal gets the opportunity to satisfy its instincts, regardless of the needs of another animal and even at its expense, and this second animal is forced to refrain from satisfying its instincts if this desire comes into conflict with the desires first animal. The first animal occupies the position (acquires a “status”, as ethologists say) of the dominant (dominant), and the second - the position (status) of the dominated (subordinate).

The dominant animal is usually the stronger one, the subordinate animal is the weaker one. One of known ways determination of status - a fight. More often than not, however, dominance relationships are established without physical confrontation. Sometimes the threat from one animal is enough to turn another into a subordinate. In other cases (usually when animals differ sharply in strength) and threats are not required.

In a zoological association, dominance relations are established between all animals, excluding the young. The elementary dominance relations that exist between every two adult animals form a complex hierarchical system in which each animal occupies certain place. In the zoological association there is thus a system of ranks. One of the animals can only be dominant. In this case, it has the highest rank and plays the role of leader. Most of the members of the association become dominant in relation to some and subordinate in relation to others. Individual animals are in the position of only dominated. The behavior of each animal largely depends on its position in the hierarchy, on its rank.

These relationships are clearly visible in groups of monkeys living in captivity. When animals are given food, it is not uncommon for one leader to initially approach it, sometimes several more monkeys begin to eat with him, whom he will encourage to this by his behavior. When these animals are sated, it is the turn of the next in rank. The weakest animals get access to food only after the main part of the group leaves the feeding place. Teenagers and old animals are in the worst position. They often go hungry even when there is enough food.

Dominance is sometimes interpreted as the curbing of zoological individualism. In reality, however, it is the most striking manifestation of animal egoism. Dominant animals satisfy their instincts, completely disregarding the needs of subordinate animals, and sometimes at their expense.

IN vivo dominance relations manifest themselves in different ways in associations of different animals and in different spheres of activity. Monkeys are animals, mostly herbivores. Their food, as a rule, is scattered in space and is available to everyone. Therefore, dominance relations in this area are almost not manifested in monkeys. However, when a more or less rare or attractive food object comes into view of several animals, it is the dominant animal that takes possession of it, and the subordinates, as a rule, yield without much resistance.

The chimpanzees great apes, closest to humans, there have been cases of hunting more or less large animals. Fights broke out over booty. All the meat, or at least most of it, went to the dominant animals. The rest, as a rule, received nothing. In the sphere of meat distribution among chimpanzees, zoological individualism completely dominated.

Domination - the only way coordinating the clashing aspirations of the members of an ordinary zoological association. Dominance prevents constant conflicts within the association of higher animals, provides relative peace and order within the framework of such an association.

Little puppy, kitten, guinea pig, parrot, fish quickly become full-fledged members of the family. When the animal feels unwell, we worry about him, like a small child. We rush for help to specialists, undergo complex courses of treatment, but sometimes intensive therapy does not give any results, and the doctors shrug... Or, on the contrary, the patient suddenly recovers.

If you draw a parallel between you and a sick pet, quite often there are many coincidences. No, no, this statement absolutely does not mean that if a cat was given some terrible diagnosis, then it will be confirmed with you!

However, even scientists confirm that the animal inevitably takes on the pathology of the weakest household. As a rule, it is with this person that the four-legged friend spends the most time. There is an amazing theory, confirmed by centuries of research, that our smaller brothers project onto themselves the problems of the owners, taking away their pain, fears, mental suffering, psychological problems and physical ailments. If people have all the diseases from the nerves, then our pets have all the diseases - from us!

Theories of parapsychology and the teachings of Luule Viilma

What to do if your little friend gets sick? Parapsychologists offer several answers.

1. If you feel depressed, suffer from internal discomfort, then you urgently need to cheer up and stop moping, otherwise your pet is unlikely to recover!

2. If, after the appearance of the animal, one of the relatives had a chronic illness or the condition improved dramatically, it means that the little friend took the blow. Surround him with love, and then the animal will be able to cope with the disease.

3. The animal can be used by the magician as a diversion, when the sorcerer, like a shield, "covers" the beast. The last statement seems unlikely, but our ancestors often resorted to this trick. "Totem animals" is not a beautiful legend, but thousands of years of wisdom. True, if the animal really became a victim of a sorcerer, you will have to turn to mediums for help.

If you reject esoteric teachings, then read the works of Luule Viilma, an Estonian doctor who has scientifically proven the effectiveness of animal therapy. In his books, Luule teaches the art of living and, with a million examples, argues the pattern between diseases of a person and his pet.

“In others, we see our own stresses. If we don’t have some kind of stress, then we don’t notice these stresses in others, even if they have them. ” Wilma taught. If the pet is sick, this is the first signal that the harmony is broken.

In the works of Luule, a causal relationship between human behavior and a pet's illness is clearly demonstrated. Moreover, animals react sharply not only to diseases, but also to your emotions. Vomiting can become a reaction to the owner's anger, stress and neuroses can lead to uncontrolled urination in the animal. Envy, fear, arrogance will also negatively affect the beast.

Animal therapy is the latest science with thousands of years of practice

Modern medicine has included the terms "animal therapy" or "pet therapy" in dictionaries. This teaching has long gone beyond the scope of alternative healing. Authoritative medical publications recommend swimming with dolphins, horseback riding, feline therapy (treatment with cats), canistherapy (communication with dogs) and many other interesting techniques that give 100% results even in hopeless cases. After all, animals interact with a person on a spiritual level, fill them with positive emotions, relieve stress, purify bioenergetics, thereby giving vitality and filled with love.

Hippocrates "prescribed" horse riding for neuroses. IN ancient india doctors treated diseases with bird chirping. The wise Greeks and Egyptians noticed that dogs and cats have an amazing ability to heal any ailments. In the 18th century, the British used pets as a sedative for the mentally ill.

The founder of the method is Boris Levinson, an American psychiatrist who saved sick children by communicating with his dog. Today even World Organization Health care does not refute the fact that people who communicate with tailed and shaggy ones suffer less from cardiovascular diseases, are less prone to stress and mental disorders. German gerontologists have calculated that people who are constantly in contact with animals live an average of 13 years longer.

Pets: they treat us, and we ... kill them?

Zootherapy is extremely relevant today. However, it is extremely rare that we get a pet in order to improve health. Touching and defenseless creatures become our close friends. It's not for nothing that they are called the best cure for loneliness! “We are responsible for those we have tamed,” and when a cute creature begins to lose weight, loses appetite, suffers from kidney failure, you need to look for the answer not in the results of analyzes and medical reference books, but in your attitude to life.

All cat lovers know that wayward purrs adore household appliances and electrical appliances. A cat can lie on the TV for hours, washing machine and other pathogenic sources. For humans, these radiations are harmful, but for the cat family, they are a necessary nourishment. Cats have a unique ability to harmonize energy flows, balancing the balance between negative and positive energy.

The cute rite of kneading with the paws of parts of the body in which we feel pain or places with a potential threat has a deep esoteric connotation. Thus the shaggy doctor delivers us from negative energy absorbing it and restoring harmony. The terrible habit of marking territory, urinating in inappropriate places and ruining things is also unusually interpreted by bioenergetics. It turns out that this is how the animal tries to neutralize harmful fluids and balance the energy-information field.

Not only cats can restore energy circulation. Dogs, birds, rodents are no less susceptible to astral vibrations. All animals feel great thin world. Animals not only purify the human aura and the biofield of the apartment. They interact with each other. People who have several pets at once know how animals can empathize and support each other.

Unfortunately, the love of our smaller brothers sometimes leads them to death. Animals are capable of self-sacrifice, and in trying to save us, they often forget about self-preservation.

Veterinarians, before prescribing treatment, clarify the environment in which the “patient” lives. After all, without eliminating the root cause of the disease, without changing your psycho-emotional attitudes towards yourself and others, you will not be able to save your four-legged friend, and medicines will not help or will have a short-term effect. Analyze your condition, exclude destructive emotions such as anger, resentment, jealousy - they destroy not only a person, but also his loved ones! Avoid negativity, try to change your attitude towards people and improve the atmosphere in the house. radiate positive emotions and share them with others, and even if you do not believe in Luule Viilma's theory, this will definitely help your pet!

People no longer consider themselves part of the animal world, they ignore or rationalize the manifestations of their nature, contact with animals is difficult. Having mastered the art of reincarnation, you will be able to restore the lost skills of communication with Nature.

Human and nature

Virtually all known shamanistic¹ cultures practice respect for animals.

Animals are revered as teachers and advisers of man. It is believed that they are able to teach us to live in harmony with Nature and Spirit.

In order to better understand animals and build relationships with them, we must communicate with them, and go even further - to groking². Only in this way can we learn from Nature what we cannot even believe in now.

All ancient shamanistic traditions keep the memory of those wonderful times when animals and people could freely communicate with each other. And our modern culture provides examples of a deep intuitive connection between man and animals, usually in the case of dogs and horses. So the talent of communication is not completely lost yet.

But in our day, such a connection and attitude towards animals should be based on love, friendship and mutual assistance between an animal and a person. About how and what you can learn from an animal, Alain Bouni told. At one time, he was assigned to a movie star - a German shepherd named Strongheart.

The story of a friendship

At first he, as befits a man, looked down on the dog. But over time, completely changed the style of communication. He learned to speak to him without words. On this occasion, he writes: “When I sincerely wanted and felt that I was ready for the dog to teach me, Strongheart was imbued with confidence in me and revealed incredible secrets.

He taught me to be in harmony with myself and others, and to be happy every second of life, regardless of circumstances. Booney does not use our term "groking", but quite accurately describes the corresponding state, "when each of us, without trampling on our own individuality, so merged with the other that we seemed to become one."

How to make contact with animals?

Both groking and learning from animals by imitating their behavior will only be beneficial when you approach them as an equal, with an open heart, and act with full awareness of what is happening.